On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:53:12AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:50PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC
> > controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It turns
> > sdhci-of-esdhc.c and sdhci-esdhc-imx.c i
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:33:22AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:47PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The patch turns the common stuff in sdhci-pltfm.c into functions, and
> > add device drivers their own .probe and .remove which in turn call
> > into the common functions,
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 18:52 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, john stultz wrote:
> > So I've been seeing USB issues on my beagle xm board with the latest
> > linaro-2.6.38 tree, where when the system boots, lsusb will only show
> > the hubs, but no devices.
> >
> > Andy repor
On 03/31/2011 03:39 PM, john stultz wrote:
> 9e64bb1e9f0613093b3e34ac5402fcfef0dcc35a is the first bad commit
> commit 9e64bb1e9f0613093b3e34ac5402fcfef0dcc35a
> Author: Keshava Munegowda
> Date: Tue Mar 1 20:08:19 2011 +0530
>
> arm: omap: usb: Invoke usbhs core device initialization
>
>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, john stultz wrote:
>
>> Hey Nico,
>> So I've been seeing USB issues on my beagle xm board with the latest
>> linaro-2.6.38 tree, where when the system boots, lsusb will only show
>> the hubs, but no devices.
>>
>> A
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, john stultz wrote:
> Hey Nico,
> So I've been seeing USB issues on my beagle xm board with the latest
> linaro-2.6.38 tree, where when the system boots, lsusb will only show
> the hubs, but no devices.
>
> Andy reported seeing similar on his overo board, so I bisected
Hey Nico,
So I've been seeing USB issues on my beagle xm board with the latest
linaro-2.6.38 tree, where when the system boots, lsusb will only show
the hubs, but no devices.
Andy reported seeing similar on his overo board, so I bisected the issue
down to:
9e64bb1e9f0613093b3e34ac5402fcf
Greetings,
We are pleased to announce that we now have a new blog engine
(WordPress, so much better than the previous one), and also a Planet
Linaro RSS aggregator.
See
http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2011/03/31/wordpress-planet-linaro/
for details.
Many thanks to Ian Davenport for the blog up
Hi,
Linaro is pleased to announce that the 11.05 Beta Ubuntu images are now
available to download.
After much blood, sweat and tears we now have a total of 10 different
boards supported (in our own unique hardware pack and board-neutral
rootfs architecture) along with a more focused 4 differen
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:24:32AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> With the platform clock support, the 'struct clk' should have been
> associated with device_node->data. So the use of function
> __of_clk_get_from_provider can be eliminated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
Not really true since a device
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:24:30AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> This patch is to change the static clock creating and registering to
> the dynamic way, which scans dt clock nodes, associate clk with
> device_node, and then add them to clkdev accordingly.
>
> It's a pretty straight translation from no
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:24:29AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> This pointer to 'struct clk' is added to save the reference to 'clk'
> which is dynamically created per dt clock node, so that clkdev API
> like clk_get can work with dt based device driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
> ---
> include
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> As the .dtb files will be naturally generated in the same kernel
> >> folder as kernel image sits, why do not we ship .dtb in the same
> >> folder as kernel image /boot?
> Version numbers. If two kernel packages are installed, that means two
> sets of
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> As the .dtb files will be naturally generated in the same kernel
>> folder as kernel image sits, why do not we ship .dtb in the same
>> folder as kernel image /boot?
Version numbers. If two kernel pa
I have an Overo Tide that is capable of running at 720Mhz. It defaults
to 600Mhz, but the mpurate kernel command line argument allows it to
overridden.
The problem is that Linaro kernels (with the Linaro .config) always show
499.92 BogoMIPS in /proc/cpuinfo regardless of what I pass as the mpurate
Hi All,
The minutes of the power management weekly call can be found at :
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-03-31
Highlights: 11.11 planning: results of discussions with TSC
Regards,
Amit
___
linaro-dev mailing list
Hi Wolfram,
On Fri, Mar 25 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Here are what the patch set does.
>
> * Remove .probe and .remove hooks from sdhci-pltfm.c and make it be
> a pure common helper function providers.
> * Add .probe and .remove hooks for sdhci pltfm drivers sdhci-cns3xxx,
> sdhci-dove, sdhci-t
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> As the .dtb files will be naturally generated in the same kernel
> folder as kernel image sits, why do not we ship .dtb in the same
> folder as kernel image /boot?
You could say the same of kernel modules; problem is that there might
be many .dtbs and tha
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 03:25:16AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> - Add packaging of .dtb files into linux-image-linaro-* packages.
> Loic and I discussed putting them under /lib/dtb/`uname -r`/, but
> thinking about it more, it might make more sense to share the modules
> directory and use /lib/modu
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Grant Likely
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:36:16AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:52:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:34:12AM +, Liu Hui-R64343 wrote:
>> > > Hi, Grant,
>> > > The two
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:36:16AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:52:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:34:12AM +, Liu Hui-R64343 wrote:
> > > Hi, Grant,
> > > The two patches for mx51/mx53 DT support have the same issue, which
>
Hi Grant,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:52:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:34:12AM +, Liu Hui-R64343 wrote:
> > Hi, Grant,
> > The two patches for mx51/mx53 DT support have the same issue, which
> > is the S-O-B will be missed when you git am. Let me know if you want
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 03:13:58PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> After fec dt support is added, the following compile error will be
> seen when building a pure non-dt kernel.
>
> drivers/net/fec.c: In function ‘fec_probe’:
> drivers/net/fec.c:1383: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘of_match_
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:51PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The structure sdhci_pltfm_data is not necessarily to be in a public
> header like include/linux/mmc/sdhci-pltfm.h, so the patch moves it
> into drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.h and eliminates the former one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:50PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC
> controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It turns
> sdhci-of-esdhc.c and sdhci-esdhc-imx.c into one sdhci-esdhc.c,
> which gets the same pair of .probe and .remov
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:49PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The patch turns the sdhci-of-core common stuff into helper functions
> added into sdhci-pltfm.c, and makes sdhci-of device drviers self
> registered using the same pair of .probe and .remove used by
> sdhci-pltfm device drivers.
>
> As a
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The patch is to migrate the use of sdhci_of_host and sdhci_of_data
> to sdhci_pltfm_host and sdhci_pltfm_data, so that the former pair can
> be eliminated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely
> ---
> drivers/mmc/h
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:47PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The patch turns the common stuff in sdhci-pltfm.c into functions, and
> add device drivers their own .probe and .remove which in turn call
> into the common functions, so that those sdhci-pltfm device drivers
> register itself and keep al
Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is
based on nand_spl support.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
Makefile| 11 ++-
spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile | 104 +++
spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/m
SMDKV310 board is based on Samsung S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very much
similar to S5PC210.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera
---
board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile| 46 +++
board/samsung/smdkv310/config.mk |1 +
board/samsung/smdkv310/lowlevel_init.S |
Hi,
This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code.
Chander Kashyap (2):
ARMV7: Adding support for Samsung SMDKV310 Board
ARMV7: MMC SPL Boot support for SMDKV310 board
Makefile
31 matches
Mail list logo
