Hi Grant, On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:52:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:34:12AM +0000, Liu Hui-R64343 wrote: > > Hi, Grant, > > The two patches for mx51/mx53 DT support have the same issue, which > > is the S-O-B will be missed when you git am. Let me know if you want me > > re-send the two patches or you would take care when you am it? Thanks, > > I fixed it up. Don't worry about it. > I'm little confused by the Kconfig changes in this patch. I saw your comments on SMDKV310 patch as below. But this patch was accepted with MX5_DT_COMMON selected, which in turn selects USE_OF and PROC_DEVICETREE.
--- quota begins --- > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig > index a021b52..78f5924 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig > @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ config MACH_SMDKV310 > select EXYNOS4_SETUP_I2C1 > select EXYNOS4_SETUP_KEYPAD > select EXYNOS4_SETUP_SDHCI > + select USE_OF I would drop this bit (I dropped it from my branch when I applied the patch). Device tree support remains an optional feature. Instead it can be enabled by default in the defconfig (or however the config is managed for the kernel package) --- quota ends --- BTW, are you silently renaming the original devicetree/test branch to devicetree/test-2.6.38 and using new devicetree/test for Nicolas to pull Linaro bits? If that is the case, what branch devicetree/arm-linaro-2.6.38-rebuilt will be for? -- Regards, Shawn _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
