Hello all,
I'm looking at function of_device_alloc in drivers/of/platform.c, and
surprisingly found that the platform device instance id is being
hard-coded as -1 when calling platform_device_alloc. Does this mean
that there is no support of pdev id in DT? If yes, can anyone please
help me under
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:44:48AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:48:10AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > The patch is to add all gpt, uart related dt clock nodes for babbage.
> > > It sticks to the clock name used in cloc
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Andy Green wrote:
>> On 03/09/2011 09:04 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
I take it this magic of SMP or not is hidden in this config layering
scheme
you mentioned and it isn't re
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
> I don't know why we're installed the firmware deb, does any of the
> hardware we're supporting even use that?
>
fwiw... TI wlan chipset firmware (wl127x) is in this package. so on
pandaboard with current mainline + linux-firmware you can get wifi
Hi,
The minutes from the Engineering Resources team meeting can be found
here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Mentoring/Status/WeeklyMeeting/2011-03-11
Summary below.
--Matt
=== Action Items from This Meeting ===
* AddNewHardware/HardwarePack pages need to explain kernel packages
as Steve noted b
On 8 March 2011 02:37, Jim Huang wrote:
> I just updated wiki page about Google's compiler benchmark suite:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/UpstreamToolchain
> Please check the section, "Evaluate Benchmark suite".
> Through adb[1], it is highly convenient to bench generated binary
>
+++ Steve Langasek [2011-03-11 09:52 -0800]:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:20:35AM +, Dave Martin wrote:
> debootstrap will balk at trying to install a system with no dpkg installed,
> because dpkg is an essential package. And indeed, various packages will
> fail to configure properly if dpkg
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:08:57AM +, Dave Martin wrote:
> /var/lib/dpkg/info is often pretty big too; if there was a way to keep
> this compressed and/or remove certain files, that could be
> interesting.
Nope, this is the package manager db; removing things from this directory
corrupts the
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:20:35AM +, Dave Martin wrote:
> Although it's not directly related to nano (which is useful in itself
> as a miminal usable system) it could make sense to be able to generate
> images with no built-in packager support - i.e., the packer must
> effectively be run offli
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:01:46PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> > As I understand it, debootstrap or germinate basically do the right
> > thing. All we would need would be to document the use of the existing
> > tools, and provide suitable ultra-minimal se
Hello All
I'm about to start work on getting kprobes working with thumb2.
One of the issues I have is that when probes are placed onto
conditionally executed instructions in a IT block, they may not fire if
the condition is not met. This is because on ARM we use invalid
instructions for breakpoin
Hi,
I am looking for a test framework to verify liability of I/O storage.
Most of the test tool I find focus on performance.
I would like to run test that compares in-buffer and out-buffer, use
different address and size alignment for in-buffer and out-buffer,
runs tests simultaneously on multiple
Fix for LP #731780.
---
tasks/mktarball.sh | 60
tasks/tarballs.mk |4 ++-
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 tasks/mktarball.sh
diff --git a/tasks/mktarball.sh b/tasks/mktarball.sh
new file mode 100755
Hi,
The Validation team weekly report for 2011-03-10 is now available
and can be found at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Validation/Status/2011-03-10
The report is also reproduced in full below.
Regards,
Jamie.
--
Linaro Release Manager | Platform Project Manager
--
* Period: (20110
On Friday 11 March 2011, Jason Hui wrote:
> >> Alternatively, it could be done the other way round: rename the identifiers
> >> in the file from mx51_ to mx5_, and make sure that they don't contain
> >> any mx51 specific settings but always refer to properties in the
> >> device tree for the differ
Hi,
> > Installed image is 125 Megs. (Down from 290 Meg) We're on the cusp
> > of being able to fit into 128 megs of flash.
>
> If that's seen to be interesting, we should probably discuss it with
> the emdebian folks-- there's a risk of reinventing what they do; plus
> they certainly have tools
+++ Dave Martin [2011-03-11 11:20 +]:
> Although it's not directly related to nano (which is useful in itself
> as a miminal usable system) it could make sense to be able to generate
> images with no built-in packager support - i.e., the packer must
> effectively be run offline to generate the
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> As I understand it, debootstrap or germinate basically do the right
> thing. All we would need would be to document the use of the existing
> tools, and provide suitable ultra-minimal seeds (at the level of
> busybox+libc only) and/or an ultra-minimal --v
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In the developer platforms team we're working on getting the
> linaro-nano image so that it is considerably smaller. To date I've
> been using the approach I outlined last fall in a previous post to
> this list.
>
> Some highlights to n
Dnia 2011-01-21, pią o godzinie 16:44 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze:
> > > I would like to announce new Linaro PPA available for all users of Ubuntu
> > > 10.04 Lucid and 10.10 Maverick releases:
> > >
> > > https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/toolchain
> > >
> > > What is inside
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Tom Gall wrote:
>> Specifically from the installed image after the hwpack deps are
>> installed get rid of the following:
>> rm -f ./var/lib/apt/lists/*Packages
>> rm -f ./var/lib/apt/lists/*Sources
>> rm -f ./var/lib/apt/
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Andy Green wrote:
>> On 03/09/2011 09:04 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
I take it this magic of SMP or not is hidden in this config layering
scheme
you mentioned and it isn't r
Hi,
The Developer Platform team weekly report for 2011-03-10 is now
available and can be found at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/Status/2011-03-10
The report is also reproduced in full below.
Regards,
Jamie.
--
Linaro Release Manager | Platform Project Manager
--
* Perio
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 03/09/2011 09:04 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
>>> I take it this magic of SMP or not is hidden in this config layering
>>> scheme
>>> you mentioned and it isn't really using the same config for say igep0020
>>> and
>>
>> No
Hi, Shawn,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:33:24PM +0800, Jason Hui wrote:
>> Hi, Shawn,
[...]
>>
>> No, I don't think so. Where the section is put is not one strict rule,
>> take a look at
>> powerpc dts file, you will see that.
>>
> Maybe I did not
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:33:24PM +0800, Jason Hui wrote:
> Hi, Shawn,
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:59:42PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> >> Singed-off-by: Rob Herr
26 matches
Mail list logo
