On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 23:17 -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 14:23 +0800, Jeremy Chang wrote:
> > Hi, John:
> > I have one question about the origin/dev/linaro.android branch
> > right now for beagleboard xM.
> > After tried, I still can not see the terminal log after the "Vir
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 14:23 +0800, Jeremy Chang wrote:
> Hi, John:
> I have one question about the origin/dev/linaro.android branch
> right now for beagleboard xM.
> After tried, I still can not see the terminal log after the "Virtual
> kernel memory layout" message with EARLY_PRINTK enabled.,
Hi, John:
I have one question about the origin/dev/linaro.android branch
right now for beagleboard xM.
After tried, I still can not see the terminal log after the "Virtual
kernel memory layout" message with EARLY_PRINTK enabled., even printk
messages in omap3_beagle_init() can not be seen.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Jim Huang wrote:
> On 1 March 2011 10:45, Michael Hope wrote:
> [...]
>> I'd like to use Skia as a toolchain benchmark but the upstream seems a
>> bit messy. I'm using this export:
>> http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/skia-0~svn788.tar.xz
>
> hi Michael,
>
> Tha
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>>
>>> The resulting kernel builds and boots but some modules have problems:
>>>
>>> $ modprobe fat
>>> fat: unknown relocation: 102
>>>
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 March 2011 20:45, Jamie Bennett wrote:
>> On 01/03/11 at 01:25pm, Tom Gall wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jamie Bennett
>>> wrote:
>>> > https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MonthlyMilestones
>
>> If agreed I would propose th
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
>
> > Hi Nicolas,
> >
> > Attached patch set has support for MPU DVFS (cpufreq) on OMAP4 and
> > these are rebased against latest .38 linaro kernel.
> > omap cpufreq driver changes are already posted to l
On 1 March 2011 20:45, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> On 01/03/11 at 01:25pm, Tom Gall wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jamie Bennett
>> wrote:
>> > https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MonthlyMilestones
> If agreed I would propose that all projects use the milestone names and
> dates in the abov
On 01/03/11 at 01:25pm, Tom Gall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jamie Bennett
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Throughout Linaro we are looking at ways to better coordinate the
> > deliverables that come from Linaro's Working Groups and Platform teams.
> > The idea of Monthly Component releases
On 01/03/11 at 04:10pm, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 March 2011 16:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:04:54PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> Hi. On snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/ there are now the
> >> following different kinds of snapshot image:
>
> >> ...but I can't fi
Hi,
You can see them at
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Meetings/2011-03-01
or below.
Thanks,
James
=== Attendees ===
* Mattias Backman
* Guilherme Salgado
* Deepti Kalakeri
* James Westby
* Jamie Bennett
* Alexander Sack
=== Agenda ===
* Actions from last me
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Throughout Linaro we are looking at ways to better coordinate the
> deliverables that come from Linaro's Working Groups and Platform teams.
> The idea of Monthly Component releases, a fixed date in the month where
> each team would rel
W dniu 01.03.2011 16:49, Jamie Bennett pisze:
Please take a look at the dates and highlight any problems that could
arise from them. If there is positive feedback we can make these dates
'official' very soon meaning teams could start using this format next
month.
Sice having no planned release
On 1 March 2011 16:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:04:54PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Hi. On snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/ there are now the
>> following different kinds of snapshot image:
>> ...but I can't find anything on the wiki which documents
>> what each of t
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:04:54PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi. On snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/ there are now the
> following different kinds of snapshot image:
>
> linaro-alip/
> linaro-developer/
> linaro-graphical-engineering/
> linaro-handset-plasma/
> linaro-headless/
> l
Hi,
Throughout Linaro we are looking at ways to better coordinate the
deliverables that come from Linaro's Working Groups and Platform teams.
The idea of Monthly Component releases, a fixed date in the month where
each team would release their latest work fits well with what we do and
to that en
Hi. On snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/ there are now the
following different kinds of snapshot image:
linaro-alip/
linaro-developer/
linaro-graphical-engineering/
linaro-handset-plasma/
linaro-headless/
linaro-multimedia-engineering/
linaro-nano/
linaro-netbook-efl/
...but I can't find anything
Forwarded for interest; a number of ARM / Linaro folks were involved
last week.
- Forwarded message from Hector Oron -
From: Hector Oron
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:03:02 +
To: debian-devel-annou...@lists.debian.org
Cc: b...@genesi-usa.com, da...@toby-churchill.com
Reply-To: debian-emb
Hi All,
I have sent an invitation for 3pm UTC Monday 7th March to have a
discussion on things that can be explored/worked upon in Linaro related to
v4l2 support.The idea is to come out with concrete activities that can be
targeted in Linaro MM WG to address this topic.
If any body is unhappy wi
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> The resulting kernel builds and boots but some modules have problems:
>>
>> $ modprobe fat
>> fat: unknown relocation: 102
>> FATAL: Error inserting vfat
>
> A workaround for what appears to be
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 09:50 +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
[...]
>
> I'm not sure that highmem is the right solution. First, this will force
> systems with rather small amount of memory (like 256M) to use highmem just
> to support DMA allocable memory. It also doesn't solve the issue with
Hello,
On Tuesday, March 01, 2011 11:26 AM Edward Hervey wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 09:50 +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> [...]
> >
> > I'm not sure that highmem is the right solution. First, this will force
> > systems with rather small amount of memory (like 256M) to use highmem
On 1 March 2011 18:07, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 01/03/11 07:00, Jim Huang wrote:
>>> I think thats fine. however, how do we ensure that we have patches
>>> > that always apply to both release/snapshots? do we maintain branches
>>> > for gcc-patches.git in case you need two versions of patch X i
On 01/03/11 07:00, Jim Huang wrote:
I think thats fine. however, how do we ensure that we have patches
> that always apply to both release/snapshots? do we maintain branches
> for gcc-patches.git in case you need two versions of patch X if the
> linaro gcc codebase diverged?
I might need help
24 matches
Mail list logo
