On 1 March 2011 18:07, Andrew Stubbs <andrew.stu...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 01/03/11 07:00, Jim Huang wrote: >>> I think thats fine. however, how do we ensure that we have patches >>> > that always apply to both release/snapshots? do we maintain branches >>> > for gcc-patches.git in case you need two versions of patch X if the >>> > linaro gcc codebase diverged? >> >> I might need help from toolchain WG. > > I aim to have Android support in Linaro GCC soon, but I lack the ability to > test it. In fact, I have wanted to have Android support in both February's > and March's release, but it isn't going to happen now.
hi Andrew, Thanks for replying. > I did build a Linaro GCC with the Android patches installed, and it did > appear to build a lot of the Android tree, but the Android build is broken. > There are problems with -Werror, but even when you work around those, it > still won't build. :( > > When somebody gives me a properly patched Android tree, that will build > out-of-the-box with GCC 4.6, then I will be unblocked, and Linaro GCC will > have Android support shortly afterwards. :) Jeremy and I will help you to resolve Android build issue later. At the moment, you can safely remove "-Werror" from Android build system. Regards, -jserv _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
