On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> There are two parts to this: first of all you need a way to allocate large
> buffers. The CMA patch series is available (but not yet merged) that does
> this.
> I'm not sure of the latest status of this series.
>
> The other part is that ever
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Edward Hervey wrote:
>
> What *needs* to be solved is an API for data allocation/passing at the
> kernel level which v4l2,omx,X,GL,vdpau,vaapi,... can use and that
> userspace (like GStreamer) can pass around, monitor and know about.
yes yes yes yes!!
vaapi/vdpa
On Thursday 24 February 2011 14:17:12 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 03:44:19 Clark, Rob wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty
> > > of inviting both linux-
On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 03:44:19 Clark, Rob wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty of
> > inviting both linux-me...@vger.kernel.org and
> > gstreamer-de...@lists.freedesktop.org.
From: Marek Szyprowski
Most suspend/resume code depends on CONFIG_PM. This causes problems
if one wants to enable Runtime PM (to control power domains for example),
but doesn't need system suspend/resume feature. This also enables to use
Runtime PM feature on S5PV310 which doesn't implement syste
On Tuesday 22 February 2011 03:44:19 Clark, Rob wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete wrote:
> > In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty of
> > inviting both linux-me...@vger.kernel.org and
> > gstreamer-de...@lists.freedesktop.org. For any newcomer
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:09:51AM +, Andy Green wrote:
> Well saying that it's very similar, then listing differences like
> GPIOs that could easily be runtime-detectable, doesn't really pin
> down whether that's a problem or not.
See the arch/arm/mach-kirkwood directory in the Linux tree. A
Hi,
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 17:39 +0100, Robert Fekete wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty
> of inviting both linux-me...@vger.kernel.org and
> gstreamer-de...@lists.freedesktop.org. For any newcomer I really
> recommend to do some catch-up readin
On Thursday 24 February 2011 14:04:19 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 13:29:56 Linus Walleij wrote:
> > 2011/2/23 Sachin Gupta :
> > > The imaging coprocessor in today's platforms have a general purpose DSP
> > > attached to it I have seen some work being done to use this DSP f
2011/2/23 Sachin Gupta :
> The imaging coprocessor in today's platforms have a general purpose DSP
> attached to it I have seen some work being done to use this DSP for
> graphics/audio processing in case the camera use case is not being tried or
> also if the camera usecases does not consume the
Hi,
On Thursday 24 February 2011 15:48:20 Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 03:44:19 Clark, Rob wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > In order to expand this knowled
On Thursday, February 24, 2011 13:29:56 Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/2/23 Sachin Gupta :
>
> > The imaging coprocessor in today's platforms have a general purpose DSP
> > attached to it I have seen some work being done to use this DSP for
> > graphics/audio processing in case the camera use case is
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 21:19 +0100, Edward Hervey wrote:
>
> Will GStreamer be as cpu/memory efficient as a pure OMX solution ?
> No,
> I seriously doubt we'll break down all the fundamental notions in
> GStreamer to make it use 0 cpu when running some processing.
I blame late night mails...
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> Just tested the imx51 Thumb-2 kernel on efikamx here -- it boots fine,
> but we only went as far as the initramfs.
Uh no, we booted all the way to a serial console on the real btrfs
rootfs together! :)
--
Loïc Minier
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, amitdani...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Marek Szyprowski
>
> Most suspend/resume code depends on CONFIG_PM. This causes problems
> if one wants to enable Runtime PM (to control power domains for example),
> but doesn't need system suspend/resume feature. This also enables to us
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, minutes and actions from the
Linaro Toolchain working group weekly meetings of Feb 21, 2011.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-02-21
== Summary ==
* FSF Copyright assignment is now in place
* GCC 4.6 build and test comple
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, minutes and actions from the
Linaro kernel working group weekly meeting of Feb 21, 2011.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/KernelConsolidation/Meetings/2011-02-21
== Symmary ==
* Went over the bug list reviewed and discussed current bug list
* Ope
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:11:28AM -0600, Tom Gall wrote:
> Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
> Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on February 23rd
> in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 16:00 UTC.
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Found
2011/2/24 john stultz :
> 1) Your patch was whitespace corrupted. While it was correctly sent
> inline, the patch was word-wrapped. I was able to fix this, but most
> upstream maintainers won't take the time, so you'll want to fix this in
> the future when sending patches. It looks from the mailhe
Dave,
Not sure if you noticed in the IRC logs so here is what happened for
the packaged release.
Pulled latest linux-linaro-2.6.38 that has your patches.
Fixed arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile to allow smc instructions in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
Disabled CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT.
The resulting k
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on February 23rd
in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 16:00 UTC.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Foundations/2011-02-23
Actions from the meeting where as follows:
*
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 03:44:19 Clark, Rob wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty of
>> > inviting both linux-me...
Hi,
Just tested the imx51 Thumb-2 kernel on efikamx here -- it boots fine,
but we only went as far as the initramfs.
Is anyone currently relying on CONFIG_LATENCYTOP? If so, we should
investigate what the incompatibility is...
Cheers
---Dave
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Dave Martin wrote
(Apologies for previous empty mail; trying again...)
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > since it is the only one that compiles for me. However, to my
>> > understanding, this is not a very 'saf
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > since it is the only one that compiles for me. However, to my
>> > understanding, this is not a very 'safe' branch to use on daily basis.
>> > Is that true? Is
Hi All,
The minutes of the power management weekly call can be found at :
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-02-23
Highlights: Creation of a feature matrix to easily allow outsiders to
tell what we've been upto (It is still being populated after testing
with hwpa
Hi,
The weekly Linaro Release Meeting will be held at 17:00 UTC today. The
agenda for the meeting can be found at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/WeeklyReleaseMeeting/2011-02-24
and previous action items were:
* JamieBennett to email LT to test s5pv310
* lool to ping Marex to enquire abou
27 matches
Mail list logo
