Hi ,
>
> notes and actions from our Tuesday multimedia cross-vendor call are
> available on the wiki:
>
> +
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/Notes/2010-11-30
>
> Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
>
> +
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGr
Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: Turquette, Mike [mailto:mturque...@ti.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:20 AM
> To: Vishwanath BS
> Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP PM: Optimize cpufreq transition latency
>
> On Thu, Nov 2
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:28 AM, john stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 15:48 -0800, john stultz wrote:
>> When I use http://git.linaro.org/gitweb I'm getting xml errors when I
>> click through on to any of the git repos.
>>
>> ie: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=linux/arm_next.git;a=summary
>>
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 15:48 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> When I use http://git.linaro.org/gitweb I'm getting xml errors when I
> click through on to any of the git repos.
>
> ie: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=linux/arm_next.git;a=summary
>
> XML Parsing Error: undefined entity
> Location: http://
When I use http://git.linaro.org/gitweb I'm getting xml errors when I
click through on to any of the git repos.
ie: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=linux/arm_next.git;a=summary
XML Parsing Error: undefined entity
Location: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=linux/arm_next.git;a=summary
Line Number 41,
Greetings,
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, minutes and actions from the
Linaro kernel working group weekly meeting of November 29, 2010.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/KernelConsolidation/Meetings/2010-11-29
== Summary ==
* Focusing on completing of the blueprints Definitions
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Vishwanath BS wrote:
> Currently cpufreq transition latency value does not really reflect the actual
> OMAP OPP transition delay. This patch has the actual latency value.
> I did profile the DVFS latency on OMAP3430, OMAP3630 and OMAP4 for
> worstcase(MPU and Core
On 11/30/2010 05:03 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:17:32PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
Since the main aim here is to consolidate as much code here as
possible while still allowing platforms to override the defaults,
would you have an objection to the introduction
On 11/30/2010 03:41 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
I sat down and measured the power consumption of the NEON unit on an
OMAP3. Method
Russell,
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:03:31AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > I see no point to what is being proposed in this thread. It's _soo_
> > little code that the platforms have to implement that it really is
> > not worth the effort.
[...]
> Note also that most implementatio
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Dave Martin
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 3:41 AM
> > * VFP uses the same register set. Does a floating point
> instruction
> > also turn the NEON coprocessor on?
>
> Yes-- these are one
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:17:32PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Since the main aim here is to consolidate as much code here as
> possible while still allowing platforms to override the defaults,
> would you have an objection to the introduction of a struct smp_ops
> that'll allow a platform to ove
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:03:31AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> I see no point to what is being proposed in this thread. It's _soo_
> little code that the platforms have to implement that it really is
> not worth the effort.
>
> How do you know whether separating out the cache flushes
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:27:02PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > The goal of this patch is to remove as much duplicated code as
> > possible in each platform hotplug file. I have also tried to keep in
> > mind that current p
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Michael Hope
>> wrote:
>>> I sat down and measured the power consumption of the NEON unit on an
>>> OMAP3. Method and results are here:
>>> htt
Dave,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Michael Hope
>> wrote:
>>> I sat down and measured the power consumption of the NEON unit on an
>>> OMAP3. Method and results are here:
>>> h
Hi Stephen,
please consider to start merging our ux500-core branch into
linux-next:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson.git
Branch: ux500-core
(NB: there is a "next" branch, which include patches to multiple
subsystems, don't merge that, this is just the ux500 c
Hi
During Ubuntu 'natty' cycle I am working on backporting armel cross compiler
to 10.04 'lucid' and 10.10 'maverick' releases. I have a spec [1] for it and
go though steps.
Cross compiler is built from two source packages: armel-cross-toolchain-base
and gcc-4.5-armel-cross. There are two add
18 matches
Mail list logo
