>
>
>
> Is mutt going crazy or is the indentation here completely off?
>
> The same thing throughout the patch.
>
> It is the email client's problem, I will also put patch in attachment from
now on, for better looking.
Yong
___
linaro-dev mailing list
li
On 10 Nov 17, Yong Shen wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Great ideal to make it beyond ARM specific.
> Below is the updated patch as per your comments.
>
> From 5a3e2d3bf577e3059c9254a61d671910ab170623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Yong Shen
> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:00:28 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] e
Hi Yong,
A few more comments:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> index 0a34c81..0300c95 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> @@ -41,3 +41,10 @@ config SHARP_SCOOP
> config COMMON_CLKDEV
> bool
> select HAVE_CLK
> +
> +config
Hi Jeremy,
Great ideal to make it beyond ARM specific.
Below is the updated patch as per your comments.
>From 5a3e2d3bf577e3059c9254a61d671910ab170623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yong Shen
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:00:28 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] export clock debug information to user space
cre
Hello Marcin,
Thanks for the review ! I Agree with the changes you have suggested
and will take care of them.
Regards,
Amit Arora
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 16 listopada 2010 o 12:46:39 Amit Arora napisał(a):
>
>> As part of the Power Management Wo
In that case, please see my few comments inline.
Yong
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Yong,
>
> No. The work that you're doing is long-term. It will take time for
> platforms
> to move to the common struct clk - almost unlikely for the next Linaro
> release.
>
> In the sh
Dnia wtorek, 16 listopada 2010 o 12:46:39 Amit Arora napisał(a):
> As part of the Power Management Work Group, I have been developing a
> new tool called PowerDebug which can show users/developers information
> on regulators, senors and clock tree. Its time now to package it for
> Ubuntu (since, L
Greetings,
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
Linaro User Platforms Weekly Status meeting dated November 10th held in
#linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 13:00 UTC.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/WeeklyStatus/2010-11-10
Status Summary:
- clut
Hi Vishwanath,
> I am trying to investigate ondemand governor’s limitation in Linux kernel.
> As part of that, I have found a tool called cpufreq-bench which can be used
> to determine the performance degradation due to ondemand governor compared
> to performance governor.
>
> I would need some of
I'd like to announce that Launch Control (the project) is being packaged
and separated into dedicated launchpad projects/code trees.
I managed to set up two PPAs to make everyone's life easier:
* linaro-infrastructure/launch-control
* linaro-infrastructure/launch-control-snapshots
The first o
Hi All,
tarball with cpufreqbench and readme is available at
http://people.linaro.org/~amitk/cpufreq.tgz
Vishwanath
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Sripathy, Vishwanath
wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> I am trying to investigate ondemand governor’s limitation in Linux kernel.
> As part of that, I have fou
It's my pleasure. Thanks to the great help from Alexander and Alexandros,
and I'm glad to co-work with your guys. I believe we can get more
achievements in coming cycle. ;)
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Alexandros Frantzis <
alexandros.frant...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:1
Yong,
No. The work that you're doing is long-term. It will take time for platforms
to move to the common struct clk - almost unlikely for the next Linaro release.
In the short-term, we still need all partner platforms to expose this debug
information for our tools in a consistent way - OMAP alrea
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:15:28PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > well done to you and others (including upstreams) who worked on this!
>
> special thanks also to Jammy who restlessy did the heavy lifting of
> porting the clutk toolkit to g
Hi Amit,
We are trying to make this clock debug interface generic, so every platform
can benefit from it. Maybe it is better to wait for a while until the common
interface comes out.
Yong
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:54 PM, wrote:
> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap
>
> This patch adds support for clock
As part of the Power Management Work Group, I have been developing a
new tool called PowerDebug which can show users/developers information
on regulators, senors and clock tree. Its time now to package it for
Ubuntu (since, Linaro will pick up the package from Ubuntu repo.). We
also plan to host a
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap
This patch adds support for clock information exposed to debug-fs
interface.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
---
arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c | 92
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock.h |3 +
2 files changed, 95
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> well done to you and others (including upstreams) who worked on this!
special thanks also to Jammy who restlessy did the heavy lifting of
porting the clutk toolkit to gles 2.0 ... well done everyone!
--
- Alexander
_
All,
I am trying to investigate ondemand governor's limitation in Linux kernel. As
part of that, I have found a tool called cpufreq-bench which can be used to
determine the performance degradation due to ondemand governor compared to
performance governor.
I have used this tool on OMAP platform
Hi Yong,
Looks good, just a couple of things:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c b/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
> index 9e4c4d9..cf81e70 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
Why not do this in the core clock code (kernel/clk.c) instead? No need to make
it AR
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Yong Shen wrote:
Hi Yong,
> After this patch, powerdebug (developed by Amit Arora in power management
> group of Linaro) generates information on imx51 platform like this:
You seem to be using a bit older version of PowerDebug. Please do a
git pull. New features
21 matches
Mail list logo
