On 10 Aug 02, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Dnia poniedziałek, 2 sierpnia 2010 o 18:54:11 Amit Kucheria napisał(a):
> > pcre3 does not show in 'apt-rdepends grep', so I am not sure what is
> > going on here...
>
> Thats other direction:
>
> 19:02 h...@home:rules.d$ LC_ALL=C apt-cache showsrc grep
>
Hi Scott,
On Aug 2, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Scott Bambrough wrote:
> http://www.embedded-linux.co.uk/hardware/ccwi.imx51
>
> Alternative iMX51 development board. Found it at Future Electronics in
> the states for $795 USD.
The Genesi Efika board is $250, and is a iMX515 a8 at 800Mhz, HDMI output
wit
http://www.embedded-linux.co.uk/hardware/ccwi.imx51
Alternative iMX51 development board. Found it at Future Electronics in
the states for $795 USD.
Scott
--
Scott Bambrough
Linaro Infrastructure Team Lead
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lis
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 10:55 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I worked on a few patches to the help the userspace perf tools do
> better at loading debug symbols -- this is particularly of interest on
> Ubuntu and Linaro where separated debug symbols in .ddebs are
> typically not loaded ev
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ah - given the errors about missing /proc, I assumed this was all taking
> place in a build chroot. If this is happening during xdeb installation in a
> non-pristine chroot, then I'm ambivalent - you should have /proc mounted
> anyway, and I think worr
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:49:56PM -0400, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > For build environment correctness, it is definitely preferred to avoid
> > following recommends at installation.
> Yes, but xdeb is more an user frontend, and that's the one pulling
> d
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> For build environment correctness, it is definitely preferred to avoid
> following recommends at installation.
Yes, but xdeb is more an user frontend, and that's the one pulling
devscripts with a depends (because it calls debuild); debuild has a
cha
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 07:54:11PM +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 02, 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> >> All my xdeb builds crash and burn with the following error:
> >> arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump: /lib/libm.so.6: File format not recogn
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:58:52AM -0400, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> > I tried to install xdeb on my ubuntu PC (V 10.04), but faced some issues.
> > Attached is the error log. Any inputs?
> Hmm right, this is ugly; the story is as follows:
> * xdeb us
The specific case I was wondering about was parallel builds. Is it
worth it to have multiple sources packages that are completely
identical sources with the only difference the flavours they build in
order to allow for example omap, mx51 and versatile express to all
build in parallel.
On Mon, Aug
Dnia poniedziałek, 2 sierpnia 2010 o 18:54:11 Amit Kucheria napisał(a):
> pcre3 does not show in 'apt-rdepends grep', so I am not sure what is
> going on here...
Thats other direction:
19:02 h...@home:rules.d$ LC_ALL=C apt-cache showsrc grep
Package: grep
Binary: grep
Version: 2.6.3-3
Priority: r
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> All my xdeb builds crash and burn with the following error:
>> arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump: /lib/libm.so.6: File format not recognized
>> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump gave error exi
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> All my xdeb builds crash and burn with the following error:
> arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump: /lib/libm.so.6: File format not recognized
> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump gave error exit status 1
I'm not quite sure; would you mind sharing t
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> I tried to install xdeb on my ubuntu PC (V 10.04), but faced some issues.
> Attached is the error log. Any inputs?
Hmm right, this is ugly; the story is as follows:
* xdeb uses a script called "debuild" which wraps the usual
"dpkg-buildpackag
On 10 Jul 30, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > > Will it make sense to have a "readme.ARM" or some other file in
> > > powertop which describes this step ? Any suggestions on how best to do
> > > this ?
> > Compiling natively (on target) or in a qemu-based armel e
Hello.
I'd like to share the JSON schema for the validation dashboard "bundle"
documents. The dashboard uses this format to talk to the outside world
(to get new test results in). The format has been designed to be able
to accommodate our current requirements.
The schema can be found here:
http:/
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Vishwanath Sripathy
wrote:
> I tried to install xdeb on my ubuntu PC (V 10.04), but faced some issues.
> Attached is the error log. Any inputs?
> Thanks
> Vishwa
I just updated the wiki to add a step to mount the proc filesystem
___
I tried to install xdeb on my ubuntu PC (V 10.04), but faced some issues.
Attached is the error log. Any inputs?
Thanks
Vishwa
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > > Will it make sense to have a "readme.ARM" or some other file in
>
They will go into the master branch of the Ubuntu kernel.
Cheers,
Amit
On 10 Aug 02, John Rigby wrote:
> Are these changes going into the Ubuntu kernel? If so then they will
> come in next time I merge with it. If not I will grab your patches.
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Amit Kucheri
Separate source packages have the following features:
+ One flavour of the kernel is not dependent on others
+ Parallel builds (in theory, if there are build machines available)
+ Different people can upload
+ Different upload schedules
+ More useful if we are going to carry non-upstream BSPs
On the subject of adding other platforms, should we do a source
package per platform since it takes seven hours to build? I'm not
talking about omap4, that can coexist with omap3. Adding mx51 and
versatile express are issues though.
As I am thinking about this I wonder if it matters. Is there a
Ok, I see Nico is planning on getting them for his next merge so they
will go in then.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:27 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> Are these changes going into the Ubuntu kernel? If so then they will
> come in next time I merge with it. If not I will grab your patches.
>
> On Sat, Jul 3
Are these changes going into the Ubuntu kernel? If so then they will
come in next time I merge with it. If not I will grab your patches.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Amit Kucheria
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010, John Rigby wrote:
>>>
> kernels. How was the OMAP config built for your packages?
>
The kernel is the merge of Ubuntu-2.6.35-12.17 and
linaro_merge_100716. The config is from the Ubuntu kernel plus make
oldconfig to deal with the new options from linaro_merge_100716.
___
l
Hi there,
I worked on a few patches to the help the userspace perf tools do
better at loading debug symbols -- this is particularly of interest on
Ubuntu and Linaro where separated debug symbols in .ddebs are
typically not loaded even when present. Note that even with the
patches, the contents of
25 matches
Mail list logo
