Has Lilypond been fixed to work properly on OSX Leopard yet? I see
all kinds of archived messages about problems with it and I have just
downloaded the latest 2.11.x version and indeed it does not seem to
work on first try. here is what happens now:
1 - Download lilypond for Intel OSX
2
- vim, emacs, textmate, lilypond-tool (jEdit) are all good-
it's only the lilypond text editor which doesn't work, and to be
honest you won't miss it.
d
On 22 Jun 2008, at 23:40, Steve Schow wrote:
Has Lilypond been fixed to work properly on OSX Leopard yet? I see
Rune,
Thanks a lot for the quick response!
Oh the mysteries of Lilypond. I'm looking forward to the day I can
intuitively figure out solutions myself. I used your trick and it worked
perfectly for my first staff group, but the rest of the staff groups in the
same system now show no bracket at
Is this expected behavior or a bug?
\grace { c,16[c]} c4\p\laissezVibrer
That is producing the following with lilypond 2.10.25:
http://www.nabble.com/file/p11495639/ScreenHunter_02%2BJul.%2B08%2B21.04.jpg
What do i need to do to get the grace notes on the right side of the time
sig?
--
Vie
If you mean this is the answer:
"When skipBars is set, the result will look OK, but the bar numbering will be
off."
I already found that out from reading the manual, but I am trying to figure
out a work-around. Also, what about the notion of the part sheets showing mm
rests while the conduct
Ok. I had already read that section last night. I just read it again to make
sure. I am either blind or the answer to my question is not there.
It says in the manual:
"A crescendo mark is started with \< and terminated with \! or an absolute
dynamic. A
decrescendo is started with \> and
Yea, I've tried a couple different midi files. The same midi files open up
fine in sonar. I've read to resave them from Sonar too and those also have the
same problem. They don't crash really. Midi2ly produces a message saying that
it created my ly file. But the ly file has no note data in
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 3:37 PM
> To: Steve Schow
> Cc: 'Dewdman42'; 'lilypond-user@gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: Decrescendo on last note??
>
> Steve Schow wrote:
> > It says in the manual:
> >
> > "A crescen
Or actually the answer is to attach to spacers. Got it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Schow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 3:42 PM
> To: 'Graham Percival'
> Cc: 'Dewdman42'; 'lilypond-user@gnu.org'
> Subj
> Quoting Steve Schow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > If you mean this is the answer:
> >
> > "When skipBars is set, the result will look OK, but the bar
> numbering
> > will be off."
>
> What do you mean that the bar numbering will be off
wrote:
>
> Steve Schow wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Transparent rests in the score is easy. Add:
>
> \layout {
>\context {
> \Voice
> \override MultiMeasureRest #'transparent = ##t
> \override MultiMeasureRestNumber #'transparent = ##t
Thanks for the simple example and see the measure numbering is retained
correctly this way. But I still do not understand how I can have the conductor
score have EMPTY measures when the whole measure is a rest (but not hide the
rests in measures that have notes).
> -Original Message
Ok, here's a question. I know this question comes up occasionally. I
have been one of the people bringing it up. Why do lilypond PDF's look
crappy on-screen, even though they print fine? particularly on windows.
Here is a simple example. This screen shot is from around page 15 of the
lilypo
Using a different PDF viewer is not really an acceptable solution for work
that will be published on the internet. It needs to be acceptably viewable
in ANY pdf viewer on any platform.
I will point out again, that if a PDF is created on the mac(with finale), it
looks fine on windows. Also if
Unfortunately I can't, which is why I am now reduced to begging, pleading,
groveling and anything else that will influence the developers of Lilypond
to consider fixing it.
Graham Percival-2 wrote:
>
>
> If you can contribute any code that addresses
> these issues, great.
>
> - Graham
>
>
> For what it's worth, here's my screenshot of the same snippet
> (Linux64). It's not perfect, but not so ugly though.
Couldn't see your image?
> Honestly, I don't think LilyPond developers *can* fix it (maybe
> GhostScript guys could,
I totally disagree. I use ghostscript to produce ove
Ok, here is a short example.
This is using windows ghostscript, and using the pre-compiled postscript
file from Finale:
http://www.nabble.com/file/p11701393/ScreenHunter_03%2BJul.%2B19%2B19.33.jpg
This is using windows ghostscript direct from finale, through the print
driver:
http://www.nabbl
and here are a couple PDF's. I can't share the last one from Overture yet
due to licensing issues.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p11701415/test_ghost_direct.pdf
test_ghost_direct.pdf
http://www.nabble.com/file/p11701415/test_ghost_manual.pdf
test_ghost_manual.pdf
http://www.nabble.com/file/p117
Rune. THANKS FOR TRACKING THAT DOWN BRUTHA!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PDF-Problem-tf4114229.html#a11702477
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond
Yea so I managed to get a number of fonts working with Lilypond…. Previously I
was trying to do it with 2.25.x. But with 2.24.x stable version it’s all
working. Here are the fonts I have gotten to work so far:
Obviously emmentaler is built in and works.
In addition to that I downloaded from G
I think there are a lot of GIT gui tools out there and there is no reason you
can’t use one of those completely separate from Frescobaldi. But. Git is not
easy for some folks to grok either….it can be very dangerous to let just anyone
run git commands without knowing what they are doing with it
Thanks for that info about esmuflily, I will try that for SMuFL fonts, which I
have a few and that sounds like it will be the way of the future.
One thing that is not clear to me is what fonts are actually in the old school
lilypond format. I get that there is the built in font set called emmen
Tried esmuflily, couldn’t get it to run without errors. Sounds promising, but
it’s above my pay grade to figure out why the example from bmusicfont doesn’t
work.
Guess I will try to work with the old ones from Abraham in lilypond format…but
I sure hope lilypond will eventually support SMuFL di
New lilypond user here. What is the current situation in 2025 related to
add-on fonts for lilypond? I see that there was once a bunch of fonts made by
Abraham, and I think I have downloaded those (Haydn, cadence, etc.). Then it
appears that he was planning to release Arnold and some others c
24 matches
Mail list logo
