If you mean this is the answer: "When skipBars is set, the result will look OK, but the bar numbering will be off."
I already found that out from reading the manual, but I am trying to figure out a work-around. Also, what about the notion of the part sheets showing mm rests while the conductor score just shows empty measures? > -----Original Message----- > From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 1:57 PM > To: Dewdman42 > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Hiding whole measure rests from conductor score > > If you read the section on "Rests" in the users manual, it > tells you to > look in the section called "Multimeasure rests" > for whole measure rests, which should answer your question. > > /Mats > > Quoting Dewdman42 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I have come up with my own way to hide whole measure rests > from the conductor > > score, while displaying them for the parts, but I would > like to hear if > > there is a generally accepted better way of handling this, > as my way feels a > > little complicated. I'm trying to have it so that I have > only definition of > > the actual note data and then the part and score are > formatted differently > > from the same note data. > > > > Basically I defined a couple "macros" such as > > > > wholeRest = {s1} > > > > Then when creating my voice data I use that macro: > > > > myVoice = \newVoice { relative c' {| \wholeRest | c d e > f | \wholeRest > > | }} > > > > When I produce the Part score for that player I would then > change the > > wholeRest definition to {r1} > > > > So that works pretty well, but I am wondering if there is > an easier way to > > begin with, and then also since I am going to want to have > multi-measure > > rests for the parts, that brings up another question, which > is how I could > > have one set of voice data that feeds both part and score, > and the part > > version has a multi-measure rest, while the score version > just has empty > > measures. > > > > Perhaps I need to use some kind of parallel, merged voices > strategy that is > > not too complicated? > > > > Please forgive me if these are naive questions. I am just > starting out with > > Lilypond and I have been pouring through the manual for the > past couple days > > trying to figure this stuff out myself, but a few things are not too > > straightforward. > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://www.nabble.com/Hiding-whole-measure-rests-from-conducto > r-score-tf4045659.html#a11491939 > > Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lilypond-user mailing list > > lilypond-user@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > > > > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
