On 2015-08-09 15:37, Thomas Morley wrote:
Not sure whether Frescobaldi has a feature which fits your needs better
To transpose in Frescobaldi use Tools->Pitch->Transpose.
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://list
When you use key signatures like A major or B Major you end
up with a lot of naturals in the score for which you may
have to manually add sharps.
Is there a switch that will automatically sharp all the
naturals?
David, in a previous thread some time ago on a similar topic I think I
recall that
On 2015-08-21 08:54, tisimst wrote:
We have a full score for an ensemble of several instruments that
has a top line of extensive annotations. How does one go about
creating this so that it appears not only in the full score, but
also in every individual part?
I have starte
On 2015-09-04 18:32, David Kastrup wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When I have a score, how can I define rehersal marks globally (instead of in
every voice) so that they appear in every other voice, when I print it out (like
below)?
>
>%%
>global= {
> \time 4/4
> \key c \m
On 2015-08-26 22:10, Urs Liska wrote:
This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users
>and
>developers?
Remind me in two weeks and I'll start a poll on Scores of Beauty ...
I send in this reminder not because I'm especially interested in ages,
but it would be interesti
On 2015-09-10 15:57, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Just in case this doesn’t make it to the poll stage…
>>>This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users and
developers?
>>Remind me in two weeks and I'll start a poll on Scores of Beauty ...
>I send in this reminder not bec
On 2015-11-30 18:01, tisimst wrote:
I know that beamed grace notes don't /need/ a slash, so maybe there
could be a hook to turn it on or off?
There already is \slashedGrace. But it doesn't work for multiple notes.
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user ma
On 2016-03-18 11:39, Jaime Oliver wrote:
I am using version 2.18.2-1, with frescobaldi on a mac os x 10.11.2
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
As you are using Frescobaldi you may want to take a look at Transpose,
Modal transpose and Mode shift in Tools->Pitch.
Sometimes it preferab
On 2016-03-30 13:49, Jaime Oliver wrote:
Sometimes it preferable to change the source directly instead of using function
calls.
Could you explain when this is the case?
This was only a general reflection. The source code is more transparent
without getting filtered by functions that change
Hi Michael,
thanks for your reply!
On 01/16/2014 07:17 PM, Michael Rivers wrote:
I think you just have to remember to use \oneVoice or \stemNeutral when the
2nd voice isn't playing.
\oneVoice is the best choice, isn't it, because it affects more than
just the stems!?
If the 2nd voice is co
On 01/17/2014 02:00 AM, Mike Blackstock wrote:
Is there a way to change the "textedit://uri" mechanism in PDF
point-and-lick links to point instead to a javascript function in the
webbrowser?
I've been looking around, but I know zilch about PDF documents; the
closest
I got was this, which t
Hi Orm!
On 01/21/2014 09:06 PM, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
I'm taking the plunge to write a pretty big orchestra piece with
lilypond (contemporary music) and am wondering how to organize the
parts: There will be sections in the piece where e.g. the first
violins are split (maybe sometimes only for a
On 01/23/2014 10:40 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
Somewhere in 2.17. David introduced the change from
\override Stem #'length
to
\override Stem.length
I would like to know in which LilyPond version this appeared.
Somehow I don't seem to be able to think of the right search terms to
locate the commit(s
On 01/23/2014 10:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhr writes:
Could it be this:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=680df85187d0f3862b1ef1cf7a14f8ad7b7f0ee9;hp=ee89ee2c8ee328ec261b822aa9e260c9d623c086
No.
Sorry! Probably followed an old link!
Best
Peter
Hello,
I have a question about changing stems. In my case it's related to an
exploration of using SMuFL Fonts in LilyPond, which are made available
in the openLilyLib snippets repository by Joram Berger and Nathan Ho. I
would like to take the opportunity to thank them both!
Attached is my un
On 2014-02-27 18:33, Urs Liska wrote:
The attached image shows signs to denote heavy and light syllables in
poems (unfortunately I don't have an idea how they're called in English).
We have the portato in LilyPond/Feta which has a very similar meaning
to the "lyric" pendant, but if I'm not mi
On 2014-02-27 22:09, Urs Liska wrote:
This is exactly the glyph I wanted. But unfortunately it really
doesn't look compatible with Feta (replace the last r4 with "f--") and
see.
I'm not sure you would like the Bravura tenuto better:
\relative c'{
\stemUp
f4 _\markup { \smuflchar ##xE486
On 2014-02-27 20:44, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about changing stems. In my case it's related to an
exploration of using SMuFL Fonts in LilyPond, which are made available
in the openLilyLib snippets repository by Joram Berger and Nathan Ho.
I would like to tak
On 2014-02-28 17:18, Urs Liska wrote:
Is the attachment really what you intended?
No, I attach what it should look like. I don't know what could be
wrong... Do you have the latest version of the smufl script?
There is no fixed rule about this, but the suggestion for using this
library is
On 2014-02-28 18:36, Urs Liska wrote:
Now that I've seen this works:
It would be extremely cool if you could write a blog post about how
one can create custom stuff using Bravura like this. I think there are
some possible uses for that (e.g. clusters). Noeck's posts clearly
point in that dire
On 2014-02-28 22:18, Urs Liska wrote:
That'd be great. Just come back to us when you're likely to get
started. I think this actually has _two_ sides: accessing SMuFL glyphs
on the one hand (as a practical way to extend Lily's own capabilities)
and the process of replacing a stencil. I think
On 2014-03-01 00:04, Nathan Ho wrote:
I'm glad to hear that my work on both the SMuFL package and the LSR
snippet has helped you! However, there's a much easier solution:
#(define (penderecki-tremolo grob)
(grob-interpret-markup grob
(markup #:vcenter #:smuflglyph "pendereckiTremolo"
Janek and I have made some fuzz recently about that secret March 11, and
now's the time to disclose the great news:
Our edition of Oskar Fried's songs was elected "BEST EDITION 2014" by
the German Music Publishers' Association, and we'll receive the award at
the Frankfurt Musikmesse on Friday!
On 2014-05-08 16:22, Knute Snortum wrote:
I have a problem with sequential trill spans. they seems to be just a
little too long and therefore they stagger vertically. I would think
the solution is to shorten the trill span but I'm not sure how to do
this.
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c'''
Hi all,
is there already a function that converts a string "4." to the fraction
'3/8', or the other-way round?
Maybe it's helpful to know that the string is intended for use with
\note, e g
\note #"4." #UP
and the fraction is intended for use with \set Timing.baseMoment, e g
\set Timing.b
On 2014-05-15 15:17, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
is there already a function that converts a string "4." to the
fraction '3/8', or the other-way round?
Maybe it's helpful to know that the string is intended for use with
\note, e g
\note #"4." #UP
and the fra
Thanks a lot!
On 2014-05-20 00:49, Mark Polesky wrote:
Peter Bjuhr wrote:
And from there it would be easy to get the
moment with 'ly:duration->string'.
I don't think you need ly:duration->string; I think you can
just skip that step.
Yes, that was indee
Thanks a lot!
On 2014-05-20 00:50, Thomas Morley wrote:
Is it possible to include and use
>'parse-simple-duration' in a local script (without copy and pasting it)?
Well, I would have no problem to c/p 'parse-simple-duration', though
yes, it is possible:
#(define (note-to-moment notestr)
(
On 2014-05-20 10:26, David Kastrup wrote:
Mark Polesky writes:
Then you would use it like this:
\set Timing.baseMoment = #(note-to-moment "4.")
Anything wrong with
\set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:duration-length #{ 4. #})
Ok, you need 2.19 for it, but it seems like one of the cheaper
ways
On 2014-05-20 12:02, David Kastrup wrote:
Thanks, indeed it is cheaper. But I'm not sure if I can use it. This
>is part of a larger whole. Basically the user is intended to input a
>string with the duration, and the string will be used both for
>
>\set Timing.baseMoment
>
>and for markup via
>
>
On 2014-05-20 12:23, David Kastrup wrote:
We probably should let \note accept a duration, but it's not actually
>>hard to pick apart and use \note-by-number on the parts.
>
Maybe you misunderstood me!? I meant that the
>functionality was intended for a larger script...
So?
Maybe it was me th
On 2014-05-20 12:51, David Kastrup wrote:
You want to enter a duration in a simple manner and use it in several
contexts. One as markup, one as a duration or length.
The suggestion was to let LilyPond see it not as a string but as a
duration and go from there instead of writing your own durati
On 2014-08-09 00:11, guoguocuozuoduo wrote:
Hi all,
I am working on a piece that uses reversed and inverted clefs which
indicate retrograde and inversion.
The reversed clef is placed at the end of a line to indicate
retrograde; the inverted clef is placed before the main clef to
indicate inv
On 2014-08-19 13:52, Peter O'Doherty wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for something similar to the notation used in contemporary
scores to indicate things like wide vibrato, microtonal "undulations",
indeterminate glissando - it closely resembles a trill spanner
(without the "tr") but is more rounded a
On 2014-08-19 15:15, Peter O'Doherty wrote:
On 08/19/2014 03:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
On 2014-08-19 13:52, Peter O'Doherty wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for something similar to the notation used in
contemporary scores to indicate things like wide vibrato, microtonal
"undulat
On 2014-08-19 17:15, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
If you change the glyph names I think you'll be able to get what you
want.
Here is the full list of glyphs to choose between:
http://www.smufl.org/version/latest/range/multiSegmentLines/
Best
On 2014-10-24 15:01, Noeck wrote:
Hi,
I have a question concerning Frescobaldi: Is it possible to run a custom
script (bash/python) from Frescobaldi.
This would be my use case:
I have a script that runs lilypond and then timidity and other tools to
get ogg rehearsal files which are then packed
On 2014-10-26 13:31, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
Sorry if I’m wrong, but can’t you type anything you like into
Frescobaldi’s Engrave (Custom) command line window? Something like:
python ~/scripts/myLilypondScript.py $filename
...should run the script and pass it the filename, however that works in
Great! Thanks a lot!
Peter
On 08/30/2013 10:21 PM, Robin Bannister wrote:
Peter Bjuhr" wrote:
My starting point was that this could be achieved by using some kind
of alternative arpeggio, but so far this has not been a successful
approach.
Here is a rough sketch of such an app
Thanks!
Perhaps it's interesting to note that this (to put the arrows above the
stave) is actually what is recommended by Gould in the book for multiple
strummed chords in succession.
But in my case I'm doing single strums.
Peter
There's a flamenco snippet in the LSR which does it slightly
a tie, mostly because
it uncommon to slur notes of the same pitch. But I don't think it is
preferred practise to use it this way. The double dot could be used, but
in contemporary notation I think a tie is preferred.
Peter Bjuhr
\version "2.16.2"
\relative c'' {
\voi
Hi Janek,
I think it would be interesting to know more about of your changes to
the Feta font. Your example looks very nice, and the font can be a
little heavy I think.
Best
Peter Bjuhr
On 09/02/2013 03:59 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Hi,
2013/9/2 Urs Liska :
Hi,
I'm compiling a sele
On 09/03/2013 05:36 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2013/9/3 Peter Bjuhr :
Thanks, exciting!
I haven't, but maybe now is a good time to set this up!
Definitely :)
What operating system are you using? I can give you some help if you'd like.
That would be nice, thanks. I'm using U
tyles", or
I'm misunderstanding this!?
Best
Peter
On 09/03/2013 03:54 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Hi,
2013/9/3 Peter Bjuhr :
Hi Janek,
I think it would be interesting to know more about of your changes to the
Feta font. Your example looks very nice, and the font can be a little heavy
Sort-of. I mean, all information on how to build lilypond and
contribute to it are there, but (especially as you're already using
linux), we can do it an easier way using my awesome lilypond scripts.
Do you have git installed? And how proficient are you with command-line?
An easier way sounds gr
On 09/03/2013 06:36 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
ok. Let's see if the scripts i wrote are as awesome as i think :)
Please run the attached script. After it finishes, run
~/path-you-specify-in-previous-script/janek-scripts/lilypond/build-lily.sh--help
I can now confirm the awesomeness! Everythin
modified font...
Best
Peter
On 09/03/2013 09:44 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
On 09/03/2013 06:36 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
ok. Let's see if the scripts i wrote are as awesome as i think :)
Please run the attached script. After it finishes, run
~/path-you-specify-in-previous-script/janek-sc
On 09/04/2013 04:32 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
BTW, i've just made some small improvements to the build script, so
you can go to the janek-scripts/ directory and do a 'git pull' to get
them.
Done, thanks!
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
li
On 09/04/2013 06:06 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Hm. That's not enough information. What was the full command you ran
(with options)? Also, can you paste more output?
Janek
I have sent you the full output. I didn't do any options. Didn't last
time and didn't think of it this time. Is that the p
On 09/04/2013 04:19 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Wow! (i expected problems :P) All these hours spent on writing the
script finally paid off :-D
I recommend that you try these two branches:
origin/dev/janek/experimental-fix-for-issue-2462
origin/dev/janek/experimental-fix-for-issue-2658 (this fix
On 09/04/2013 05:45 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
No, this is the correct place. Have you pulled new commits to your
lilypond sources? I've pushed these two branches barely before
sending that email.
If you did pull and still don't have these branches, you probably just
have old git version which
On 09/04/2013 06:24 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I see. Quite strange, this commit builds fine on my machine. Please
try building from scratch (use my script with -s option), and let me
know if it fails again.
Now the build was successful! Thanks again!
Peter
_
On 09/04/2013 07:07 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Good :)
It's a known problem that sometimes lilypond fails to rebuild and has
to be built from scratch. It's nevertheless surprising that this had
happened to you...
Let me know if you'll have any problems with building other branches.
And btw, si
On 09/04/2013 07:07 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Good :)
It's a known problem that sometimes lilypond fails to rebuild and has
to be built from scratch. It's nevertheless surprising that this had
happened to you...
Let me know if you'll have any problems with building other branches.
And btw, si
Ok! I'll try out IRC!
Peter
On 09/04/2013 09:02 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2013/9/4 Peter Bjuhr :
If everything is set I'll do a test!
Attached is an image creating with old version 2.16. This is of course
regular feta font.
And an image created with the new version (2.17). This
On 09/05/2013 10:44 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices#collision-resolution
<<
{
c8 d e d c d c4
g'2 fis
} \\ {
c2 c8. b16 c4
e,2 r
} \\ {
\oneVoice
s1
e8 a b c d2
}
1, why is the snippet
I revise my answer from yesterday:
On 09/05/2013 11:48 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
2, the e,2 in the second voice is hidden by the d8 in the third voice
isn't that a bug ?
(I think you mean the e8 in the third voice.) I don't think it is a
bug, but it's contradictory to the t
I will try to find a solution to your actual problem now.
Now, I want to merge two same looking notes. It works well for the
c4 in the third beat, 1st measure, above.
\version "2.17.10"
lcl = { \revert MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position }
ma = \relative c' { \lcl d1 | g2 g | R1\fermataMarkup
On 09/06/2013 11:06 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Yes, I know.
But it's assumed in the text.
Hmm, where is that assumption stated?
This is simply non-obvious and confusing that in some examples one
cannot copy the visibly code and get the shown result.
Sorry if I stated the obvious! I interpreted y
On 09/06/2013 11:32 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
The same thing with rests, if only on rest, it applies both voices
if one rest and one note, seperate voices.
If only one whole note, both voices.
Two whole notes at same pitch just looks strange.
Have a look at:
http://turkos.aspodata.se/motett/c_s
On 09/06/2013 06:02 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Doesn't work for me, google complains I have a unsupported browser...
Or it might be that my connection is too slow.
I have sent you the image if you like to see it. But perhaps it is
unhelpful for your problem...
It might wery well be so that Ms. Go
On 09/06/2013 06:24 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
But obviously the result you are after can be achieved in same way. I
will look into it further in a moment...
Maybe this is in the right direction...
\version "2.17.10"
lcl = { \revert MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position }
ma = \rel
On 09/06/2013 07:40 PM, Kale Good wrote:
I submitted something to the mailing list with 2 attachments and it
doesn't seem to be showing up. I've never done this before (at least,
I don't remember it). Am I missing something?
Hi!
There is a memory limit for each post apparently. Perhaps you c
Hi Gilberto!
First I will like to say that your thoughts on this seems very relevant!
On 09/18/2013 06:50 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
- Also, the automatic slurs should not exist, in my opinion. Even in
Mozart's music one can find examples where acciaccaturas or grace notes are
not slurred, a
On 09/18/2013 10:38 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Also, if anyone know a way of proposing this to be implemented at some point
in the next versions of LilyPond, I would love to know what do I have to do.
The issue about the slash you can follow here:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/
On 09/19/2013 10:13 PM, Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear community,
is there a font available for special signs like up- and downbeat for
the conductor?
Do You know where to find one?
Thanks
Stefan
This is perhaps not related to LilyPond, but if anybody is looking for
musical fonts you could take
On 09/20/2013 11:20 AM, bart deruyter wrote:
I've got here a Bm/F chord that I'd like to show as simply taking the
barré-chord Bm and starting from the d-string instead of the
a-string.So the lowest sounding b-note has to be shown as muted in the
fret diagram while still showing that the index
Hi Gilberto,
About the auto-beaming for grace notes. As this mainly is about typing
convenience, I got the idea to add grace notes with beaming as a quick
insert in Frescobaldi. Do you use it? Anyway, I've created a group of
Quick Insert buttons for grace notes and it's merged into the
develo
On 09/23/2013 10:57 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
I tried to simply replace the files as you mentioned, but unfortunately I
got a series of errors and couldn't even initiate Frescobaldi. Restoring the
original files worked well though, so if you have some ideas (or other
experiments:) you'd lik
Hello Gilberto,
No problem, I understand completely. I would also hesitate to go through
that process. It's easier on Ubuntu.
I just wanted to mention it because it was you and this thread who gave
me the idea to add this quick insert.
Best
Peter
On 09/26/2013 05:37 PM, Gilberto Agostinho
On 09/27/2013 07:05 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
Does
A = \drums { sn8 sn8~ }
{ \A \A }
Do what you want?
I was curious of this, but Urs is right it does work. There are no
obstacles in ending with a tie. Apparently it is just ignored:
\version "2.17.26"
% How could I write the equivalent of
\d
On 09/27/2013 01:43 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
I've committed a patch implementing grace autobeaming to
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3566>
Hi David!
I also wanted to contribute with some testing. I changed the files with
your patched changes (lily/auto-beam-engraver.cc an
On 09/28/2013 09:27 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
There are only three rather glaringly obvious reasons I can think of:
a) you are not running the rebuilt executable
b) the rebuilt executable is in a place where it accesses the old
engraver-init.ly
c) you are looking at the wrong PDF file
If y
On 09/28/2013 10:30 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
They are probably compiled, but that does not_install_ them. You
should be able to run LilyPond from out/bin/lilypond without installing
it.
Yes, if I'm not totally mistaken I have the system setup so that I have
the stable 2.16.2 version installed
On 09/28/2013 08:49 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
\version "2.17.26"
% How could I write the equivalent of
\drums { sn8 sn8 ~ sn8 sn8 }
%using variables?
% This does work!
A = \drummode { sn8 sn8 ~ }
\score {
\new DrumStaff
{ \A \A }
}
%end with a tie
{ b'4 a' g' b' ~ }
Best
Peter
Thanks.
I didn
With the support of Janek and Franciszek I now got the compilation to
work. I should add that the problem was not in the script but due to
misuse from my part!
Attached is a test file I just run. If you David and Gilberto (or anyone
else of course) have any more test ideas for this I'll be hap
On 09/28/2013 01:41 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
That's because each \A is in a Voice of its own. Use an explicit Voice
to avoid independent implicit voices for each \A:
That's good to know! Thanks!
If I may add another more realistic yet hypothetical example. The
following works. If the ties c
On 10/04/2013 03:18 PM, Dieter wrote:
The place we came unstuck was that the exercise tune logically (or musically,
really) ends with a finger movement a real beginner might not be proficient
with. The exercise should therefore have two alternate endings - the more
"musical" one, and the simple
On 10/24/2013 09:34 AM, Simon Bailey wrote:
another question, in german these notes are often also called
"vorschlagnoten" [literally "before beat notes"] and are required to
be played before the beat they are associated with. are these notated
any differently? simply asking because i'm currentl
Maybe this can be helpful to you or anyone else. I was just reminded
when working on a solution for another issue involving beams, that
beams.positions are one of the most useful settings.
Here it is in relation to your example:
{
\override Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0
a8[ r] e8[ r] a,8[ r] a'
On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file
will be?
Is the surprising output related to this?
If an included file is given a name which is the same as one in
LilyPond's installation files, LilyPond's file from the instal
On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one.
Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-)
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis
On 11/01/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one.
Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-)
I guess it must be related to the creation of the postscript...(?)
Best
Peter
On 11/01/2013 09:32 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to
convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert.
Ok!
At first I thought it was an easter egg, but so close to Halloween it
must be a bug!
Best
Peter
___
I agree with Urs that a Stack Exchange page shouldn't be instead of this
list, if that was the suggestion.
But as Gilberto pointed out there is already LilyPond questions asked on
different Stack Exchange forums (I answered one myself earlier this
week). And it seems to be some confusion about
On 11/02/2013 08:28 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Well, they are on-topic in this mailing list.
If it's community policy or at least a general agreement that we should
always refer to this list, I will of course do so the next time!
But I hope we agree that it, as Ryan wrote, would be helpful fo
On 11/02/2013 10:28 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
If it's community policy or at least a general agreement that we
should always refer to this list, I will of course do so the next
time!
Yes, please do so.
No problem! Then I suppose I should also post that answer to the meta
question I linked to
On 11/02/2013 11:16 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
It depends. For casual users, the gmane interface is perhaps better
suited, thus the link should rather be
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general
Maybe it is even better to send them directly to the posting!?
http://post.gmane.org
On 11/08/2013 07:17 AM, zaord wrote:
Hi here,
I try to do an exercice partition for working on polyrythms with two
simultaneous rythms.
I have a score with two voice, for the two rythme of the polyrythm.
I want a gridline on the top, giving the pulse of the top-voice and a
another gridline in
On 11/08/2013 01:48 PM, daviau ewen wrote:
I hope that could help you to help me ;)
Ok, here is a more minimal example which hopefully can be a starting point!
\version "2.16.2"
voicei = \relative c''{
\time 12/4
r4 e r e ~ e r r e e ~ e r e |
e r e ~ e r r e e ~ e r r e
}
voice
On 11/08/2013 05:50 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi all,
I am not too sure if I do agree with some of the automatic beam position
done by LilyPond, and also by the spacing between a time signature and the
first note. First, about the beams. Here is a little code showing the
problem:
beam.ly <
On 11/08/2013 08:03 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi Peter!
Thanks a lot for the scan. I would say that even though she doesn't
condemns
her example a), she still considers b) as bad and c) as the best
compromise.
My corrections above are all similar to her example c)
I interpret her as s
On 11/08/2013 08:46 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi Peter,
I will ask him about this, and I will also check some other scores of mine
to see if I find these kind of beams.
And if it would not be asking you too much, do you know if Gould says
something on her book about the distance between cl
On 11/09/2013 09:24 AM, Michael Rivers wrote:
Here is the 28th bar of an etude by Rachmaninoff:
What would be the best way of fixing this output? The space between the
staves is fine for all but this system and one other with the same problem.
Could you post the same bar from an edition of
On 11/02/2013 10:28 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
If it's community policy or at least a general agreement that we
should always refer to this list, I will of course do so the next
time!
Yes, please do so.
But I hope we agree that it, as Ryan wrote, would be helpful for the
community if we found
I'm sorry, I should have been clearer what she actually measures and not
just posted the image! I hope you figured it out anyway!
What she measures is the stave-space. So, you can see her scale as a
staff turned forward 90°. It's a direct relational measure it doesn't
depend on fontsize or any
On 11/09/2013 05:09 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
But that is exactly what I did, I turned the staff 90 degrees to create that
ruler.
Yes, I thought so too (good job interpreting Gould just from the
image!). But it wasn't completely clear and I wanted to clarify anyway!
Best
Peter
On 11/10/2013 01:39 AM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
And Peter, if I may bother you a bit more, could you also have a look on this
message I posted some days ago if you have the time?
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bar-numbers-position-td153274.html
It also concerns notation standards, spec
On 11/10/2013 09:40 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi Janek,
Janek Warchoł wrote
...i believe the barnumbers in the engraved examples interfere with
clefs. I've seen some scores where similarly placed barnumbers looked
like clef transposition (especially when the first bar in a system was
8th
On 11/11/2013 09:28 AM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
What she writes is this:
Place bar numbers at the beginning of each system, ideally above the
clef of the top stave.
The above quote is from p. 484 by the way...
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
