Whole bar rests - in the wrong place

2008-05-22 Thread George_
Hi all I was typesetting some stuff and I put in a whole bar rest: %% R2.^\fermataMarkup | %% Instead of hanging from the second line as the full-bar rest should, it hangs from the top line of the staff. So, what's going on? Thanks George -- View this message in context: http://www.nabb

Re: Whole bar rests - in the wrong place

2008-05-23 Thread George_
t; perhaps you used the > <<{...} \\ {...} >> construct? Or maybe you inserted a \voiceOne > somewhere? > > /Mats > > George_ wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I was typesetting some stuff and I put in a whole bar rest: >> >> %% >> >>

Metronome marks - range of tempo

2008-05-25 Thread George_
Hi, I was wondering if it were possible to create a normal metronome marking for a piece of music, but instead of having only a concrete tempo, if it were possible to create a mark that signified a range, for example, crotchet = 84-112. Whenever I try this with the normal % \tempo = % thing the d

Re: Chords with autochange

2008-06-03 Thread George_
Hi, I just stumbled upon this since I have a similar problem. A temporary solution could be to add another voice for below and one for above, but that is obviously quite messy in the long run. Has this been fixed in any of the 2.11 releases? Mats Bengtsson-4 wrote: > > That's not supported in L

2.11.49 - MIDI (again...)

2008-06-14 Thread George_
Hi guys, I'm typesetting some music, and instead of looking through the output pdf to check if it's all correct, I'd rather use MIDI and listen, see if there's anything that sounds out of place (as you do). I've added the \midi { } block. Tick. I've put a \layout { } block above it, to get me p

Re: 2.11.49 - MIDI (again...)

2008-06-15 Thread George_
\version "2.11.49" \score { one = ^\markup \combine \musicglyph #"accordion.accDiscant" \combine \raise #1.5 \musicglyph #"accordion.accDot" \raise #2.5 \musicglyph #"accordion.accDot" two = ^\markup \combine \musicglyph #"accordion.accDiscant"

One bar, one problem...

2008-06-27 Thread George_
This bar is what I'm aiming for: http://www.nabble.com/file/p18167038/Bar.jpg I was thinking of doing this by writing the arpeggio and the first five notes of the semiquaver run on the treble staff, and then doing the quaver at the bottom, as well as the rest of the semiquavers, on the bass sta

Close-together chords with dotted durations

2008-07-02 Thread George_
Basically, my problem is this - I want to typeset this chord: 4. And this is what I get: http://www.nabble.com/file/p18251902/1.jpg Because the notes of the chord are so close together and there are so many of them, the dots all queue up. Surely there must be a way to eliminate all the extra

Lilypond not working, XP

2008-07-03 Thread George_
I recently (i.e. about twenty minutes ago) downloaded the 2.11.50-1 version of Lilypond, uninstalled 2.11.49, and installed the 2.11.50 version. However, after I had done this, none of my .ly files worked in regards to compilation; the traditional MS Windows Error Report window comes up saying Lil

Ties, and Clef change - disembodied tie ends

2008-07-07 Thread George_
Hi guys, http://www.nabble.com/file/p18330018/1.jpg Is there a way to get the tie to connect with the notes, when the staff has changed clef in the tie? Thanks George -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ties%2C-and-Clef-change---disembodied-tie-ends-tp18330018p18330018.ht

Shouldn't articulation '

2008-07-16 Thread George_
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Shouldn%27t-articulation-%27-tp18501606p18501606.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.g

Shouldn't articulation 'stick' to note-heads?

2008-07-16 Thread George_
hi guys I was wondering if there were a way to make articulation 'stick' to a notehead, no matter where it is? I use 2.11.49 on XP, and I have a two-part melody, the lower voice is to be played staccato, like so: http://www.nabble.com/file/p18501666/1.jpg Except in the lily output, the staccat

Re: GDP: second public draft, NR 2.2 Keyboard instruments

2008-07-29 Thread George_
Hi, I was wondering whether it was feasible to split the code of the discant symbols section for Accordion into two or maybe four little chunks, as this would make it easier to read and reference; alternatively, numbering the bars both on the output and the code would do that as well, or naming e

Lilypond & Ubuntu Help

2008-08-17 Thread George_
Hi, This problem isn't major, as in it doesn't stop me from doing anything important in Lilypond, but its really annoying nonetheless. I created a lilypond file on my Desktop, called, say, Test.ly. I go to the terminal and type in lilypond --pdf /home/george/Desktop/Test.ly Then all the normal

Re: Lilypond & Ubuntu Help

2008-08-18 Thread George_
Thanks for the help guys. The script works perfectly, really nice idea. George Patrick Horgan wrote: > > Jonathan Kulp wrote: >> Ah. It never occurred to me to try to allow for anything but the >> standard "lilypond filename.ly" command. That's a good idea. I don't >> use anything but the

Re: wikipedia: "GNU Lilypond" article

2008-08-26 Thread George_
Me too, I think it is too long. A musical equivalent of "Hello World" (maybe Mary had a little lamb or something similar?) would be good. An alternative is to have what is already in the online docs and the LSR, where clicking the image of the output gives you the code. Maybe that isn't actually

Dotted Notes - Dots on staff lines...:(

2008-09-23 Thread George_
Hi guys I moved to Ubuntu 8.04 a few months ago, and I've been typesetting my music there since then, with Lilypond 2.11.55. One problem I've noticed is that since I restarted using Lily, after a gap of a few weeks, the method used to typeset dotted notes have changed. Now, instead of putting the

Ubuntu install of Lilypond

2008-09-24 Thread George_
Hi guys (again...) I tried to fix the augmentation-dots-on-lines problem by upgrading lilypond, a la http://www.archivum.info/lilypond-user@gnu.org/2008-08/msg00725.html. I uninstalled Lilypond ok, but when I go to execute the .sh script and type in "sudo sh lilypond-2.11.59-1.linux-x86.sh", the

What to do when \> and \< produce text

2008-10-28 Thread George_
For some reason, about 15 bars into typesetting a piece, whenever I use and \< to typeset crescendi, Lilypond outputs this with the word 'cresc.' This doesn't happen with \>, the decrescendo prints normally, and it only started occurring, as I said, about 15 bars in - so the first few crescendi I

Re: What to do when \> and \< produce text

2008-10-28 Thread George_
I didn't change anything in between the times when the crescendi came out as hairpins and when they came out as text. In any event, the crescendi don't revert to hairpins when I put in \crescHairpin. So, now I'm just confused... George Valentin Villenave wrote: > > 2008/

Re: What to do when \> and \< produce text

2008-10-28 Thread George_
I did some tests and they came out perfectly fine, so it has to be something wrong with my ly file, right? Except I can't find anything in there that I did differently between the crescendo that came out right and the ones that started coming out wrong. The file includes one crescendo done correct

Re: What to do when \> and \< produce text

2008-10-29 Thread George_
Valentin Villenave wrote: > > > cresc = { >#(ly:export (make-event-chord (list cr))) >\set crescendoText = \markup { \italic "cresc." } >\set crescendoSpanner = #'text > } > > I don't know why George used \cresc in the first place though. > > Well, shouldn't the file be changed

Re: What to do when \> and \< produce text

2008-10-29 Thread George_
Mats Bengtsson-4 wrote: > > > This is exactly what happens if you use the command in version > 2.10 or earlier, so the current behaviour in 2.11 is a regression > bug. > > I have modified the definitions in the GIT source code repository so > that \cresc and \dim only give one-time text dynam

Error Message

2008-02-04 Thread George_
When I try to generate my .ly file, I get the following error message in the log: # -*-compilation-*- Changing working directory to `C:/Documents and Settings/George/Desktop' Processing `C:/Documents and Settings/George/Desktop/Derbenko Scherzo.ly' Parsing... E:/Temp/Lilypond/usr/bin/../share/li

MIDI

2008-02-04 Thread George_
I just don't get how to make a file into a MIDI file. For example, I have my input: \relative c' { \new PianoStaff \with { \override VerticalAlignment #'forced-distance = #12 \override DynamicLineSpanner #'staff-padding = #2.8 } << \time 6/8 \new Staff { \key d \major \tempo 4.= 84

Dynamics - Left and Right?

2008-03-14 Thread George_
I know that you can move dynamics up and down, but is there a way to move it left or right? http://www.nabble.com/file/p16048629/1.jpg The note is obviously obscuring part of the 'f', and instead of moving it above the note, I wish it moved to the left. Is there a way to do this? Or is it impo

from MIDI?

2008-03-25 Thread George_
It's possible to make a .ly file into a MIDI file, but is it possible to have a midi file and convert it back to a .ly file, or even better, a .pdf file? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/from-MIDI--tp16295951p16295951.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing

Accordion notation: registers, stradella

2008-03-27 Thread George_
I play the accordion, and sometimes receive hand-written music, which for purposes of legibility and to provide additional copies to scribble all over when I am learning, I would like typeset onto a computer and stored electronically. This is all well and good, except I can't find out how to do tw

Re: Accordion notation: registers, stradella

2008-03-28 Thread George_
Valentin Villenave wrote: > > > Hi George, > > Several solutions have been provided on this list over the past few > years, but LilyPond's syntax has changed since then and it might be a > problem. > > However, the LilyPond Snippet Repository (LSR) provides some useful > tricks for accordion

Re: Accordion notation: registers, stradella

2008-03-29 Thread George_
Ledocq-Boccart wrote: > > with the following snippet you should got the missing circle around the > dots: > > %start snippet > > accFB = > _\markup > \combine >\musicglyph #"accordion.accDiscant" >\combine >\raise #0.5 \musicglyph #"accordion.accDot" >

Phrasing Slurs and normal slurs

2008-04-21 Thread George_
Hi, I was typesetting some music with Lilypond when I got to a bar that looked like this: http://www.nabble.com/file/p16821318/1.jpg Two things: 1) Is it possible to make the phrasing slur arch lower? 2) At the end of the bar, is it possible to make the slur and the phrasing slur converge to t

Polyphony + Autochange

2009-04-18 Thread George_
I can't get autochange to work with polyphonic notation. I've tried all sorts of stuff, and everything gives results in four broad categories: 1) the voices engrave on top of each other like they should, but autochange doesn't work, 2) the voices are engraved after, not on top of, each other, 3) I

Re: SourceForge Community Choice

2009-05-26 Thread George_
Could you post a reminder, please, when the voting begins? I know it's on the Sourceforge website, but i'll probably have forgotten by then Thanks George -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SourceForge-Community-Choice-tp23709359p23730670.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond -

Ossias/footnotes

2009-11-15 Thread George_
I have a part of my score that looks a bit like this: << { \grace { \times 2/3 { d32[ ees f] } } ees8-3( d-2) d4-1 r8 bes'16-4 aes g f-1 ees-3 d-2 } \new Staff \with { \remove "Time_signature_engraver" \remove "Bar_engraver" alignAboveContext = #"main" fontSize = #-3 \override StaffSymbol #'staff

Re: Ossias/footnotes

2009-11-16 Thread George_
Gilles THIBAULT wrote: > > > The line : alignAboveContext = #"main" in the \with section, means that > you > have to call your main staff "main", if you want that the command has an > effect. > That seems to work : > > %% > \new Staff = "main" \relative { > << > { \grace \times 2/3

Force staff height

2009-11-16 Thread George_
I'm using the pianoforte template with centered dynamics, and I'm concerned that the staves are too big. Specifically, when there are dynamics in the staff, the space between the two staves (whatever it's called) is really big, and it looks kind of awkward. I think this is made worse by some notes

Re: Force staff height

2009-11-16 Thread George_
Neil Puttock wrote: > > > If you're using version 2.13.4 or later, the Dynamics context is > built-in and has slightly different code which corrects this bad > spacing, so you should remove the explicit context definition from > your file. > > So...erm...how would I go about doing that? --

Re: Force staff height

2009-11-20 Thread George_
Neil Puttock wrote: > > > Simply remove the \context block (inside \layout { }) which defines > the Dynamics context; it should look similar to this: > > \context { > \type "Engraver_group" > \name Dynamics > \alias Voice > \consists "Output_property_engraver" >

Strange message with autochange

2010-02-23 Thread George_
I'm using autochange to try change staves for an organ fugue I'm transcribing, except when I try to manually change the staff using \change Staff = "up" I get this: warning: cannot change `Staff' to `up': none of these in my family

Re: Strange message with autochange

2010-02-23 Thread George_
Update: if I put \change Staff = "up" after the rest, the b goes onto the right staff. However, the rest still stays on the bottom staff, and I get this in the log: D:/Music Work/Sheet Music/BWV 533/BWV533.ly:24:52: warning: cannot find context to switch to

Re: Strange message with autochange

2010-02-26 Thread George_
Hey, guys, could I please get some help for this? I really need to get this music transcribed for a competition in April, help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-with-autochange-tp27710824p27722612.html Sent from the Gnu -

Re: Strange message with autochange

2010-02-26 Thread George_
>Why are you using *both* \autochange (i.e. _automatic_ staff changing) >and \change Staff = "up" (i.e. _manual_ staff changing) ? > >To my opinion either you let LilyPond change automatically at a certain >note, either you decide yourself when to change, and you say LilyPond >when (using the \cha

Re: Strange message with autochange

2010-02-27 Thread George_
>Actually I'm not a pianist, nor some kind of "LilyPond-genius", so my >answer was only based on my knowledge of LilyPond (little with >keyboard-related stuffs) and also based on your minimal code, which had >only one (zero) staff change... > >Pardon my bloody stupid answer. I'm sorry. >Indeed,

Re: Strange message with autochange

2010-02-27 Thread George_
Is there any particular format I need to conform to for bug reports, or do I just write 'freestyle'? Patrick McCarty-3 wrote: > > On 2010-02-27, George_ wrote: >> >> So where can I report this? > > If you run LilyPond without arguments, you'll see

Re: Strange message with autochange

2010-02-27 Thread George_
Okay, I've put the snippet in the quote. Basically the first change shows the \change not working; the second one shows the \change working. Regardless, both produce errors in the log. > \version "2.13.7" > > \new PianoStaff { > << > \new Staff = "up" { >

Re: Strange message with autochange

2010-02-28 Thread George_
le, > csu = \change Staff = "up", > and then using that variable when you want to have a staff change, \csu. > On 27.02.2010, at 23:08, George_ wrote: > >> >> Okay, I've put the snippet in the quote. Basically the first change >> shows the >> \chan

Re: Strange message with autochange

2010-02-28 Thread George_
James Bailey-4 wrote: > > I'm still not convinced that the autochanger was ever meant to be > mixed with the manual changer. It seems that, if anything, the bug is > that it's possible to have manual staff changes whilst using the > autochanger. > I disagree. Once again citing my hypo

Re: Strange message with autochange

2010-03-02 Thread George_
Mats Bengtsson-4 wrote: > > > Well, if you manage to describe how that should work. If you imagine > yourself in the role of the autochanger, how would you react if somebody > else did some extra staff changes every now and then. When should you > start doing your ordinary job after such a

Need help with voices and staves

2010-12-01 Thread George_
I'm transcribing Bach's Fugue No. 20 in A minor from the Well-Tempered Clavier Bk. 1, and I've run into a bit of a problem: % Created on Tue Nov 30 08:26:15 NZDT 2010 \version "2.13.40" \header { title = "Fugue XX" subtitle = "A Minor, BWV 865" composer = "J. S. Bach" } st

Troubles with LilypondTool

2010-12-10 Thread George_
I'm not sure whether this is the right place to post this. I've got an issue with the pdf previewer that comes with LilypondTool. When I open jEdit and start typing, it looks fine. However, as soon as I use jEdit to compile the text, the viewer starts doing weird things: http://img696.imageshack

Re: Troubles with LilypondTool

2010-12-11 Thread George_
uments bolded) @echo off start "jEdit startup" "C:\Windows\SysWOW64\javaw.exe" -Xmx1024M -Dsun.java2d.noddraw=true -jar "C:\Program Files\jEdit\jedit.jar" -reuseview %* Valentin Villenave wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:49 PM, George_ wrote: >> >

\change Staff and barchecks in LilyPondTool

2010-12-13 Thread George_
I seem to be having a problem with \change Staff screwing up my barchecks. For example: e16 d c d e8 f \change Staff = "LH" gis, e r a | for me produces a barcheck of 9/8. bes8. a16 g f e d \change Staff = "LH" cis4 f8 \rest cis | gives a barcheck of 17/16, and \change Staff = "LH" r8 a16 gis

Re: \change Staff and barchecks in LilyPondTool

2010-12-14 Thread George_
Phil Holmes-2 wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "George_" > To: > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 10:26 PM > Subject: \change Staff and barchecks in LilyPondTool > > Could you post a tiny, complete example that shows t

Re: \change Staff and barchecks in LilyPondTool

2010-12-15 Thread George_
Cheers. I didn't know where to put this, but I thought here was best, seeing as I seem to see many people here seem to work on LilypondTool as well. Thanks George Valentin Villenave wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:26 PM, George_ wrote: >> I seem to be having a pro

Graphics in markup

2011-09-09 Thread George_
I know through the docs that using \markup { \dynamic f } will print a forte symbol. How do I get the markup to print a mordent symbol, or a trill symbol? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Graphics-in-markup-tp32435344p32435344.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailin

Re: Graphics in markup

2011-09-09 Thread George_
f unexpected MARKUP_FUNCTION and unexpected STRING errors elsewhere in the music. harm6 wrote: > > > George_ wrote: >> >> I know through the docs that using \markup { \dynamic f } will print a >> forte symbol. How do I get the markup to print a mordent symbol, or a >&

Footnotes documentation

2011-11-30 Thread George_
I'm confused by what the notation reference has to say about footnotes: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/other Regarding the example for \auto-footnote and \footnote (they are identical - why?), where do the 'b' and 'd' go? The text says that \auto-footnote means "The footnot

Need a new articulation glyph...

2011-12-03 Thread George_
I'd appreciate some feedback on how to implement a new ornament: http://old.nabble.com/file/p32910828/Untitled.png It's a Bach ornament known as a slide, and is normally played by playing the 2 consecutive notes below and leading up to the ornamented note. So for the given example, you would pl

Re: Need a new articulation glyph...

2011-12-04 Thread George_
That schleifer snippet looks promising, though editing it to fit what I need is far out of my depth; I managed to move it in front of the note, but tweaking the slur to even get close to what I want is not working at the moment. Thanks George David Nalesnik-2 wrote: > > Hi George, > >> >> >>>

ragged-last-bottom doesn't take

2011-12-09 Thread George_
For a piece I'm writing out, this is what I have at the moment: % Created on Sun Aug 28 18:32:17 NZST 2011 \version "2.15.20-1" \header { %{ headers }% } #(set-default-paper-size "a4" 'landscape) #(set-global-staff-size 18) \book { \paper { ragged-last-bottom =

Re: ragged-last-bottom doesn't take

2011-12-10 Thread George_
he lines on the last page are not spread vertically, AND so that the bars on the last line are not spread horizontally. The thing is, that setting ragged-last-bottom = ##t doesn't do anything to the layout of the score, but setting ragged-bottom = ##t does. -Eluze wrote: > > > Geor

Re: ragged-last-bottom doesn't take

2011-12-10 Thread George_
Oh, and I should also say that with the parts added in, there are no errors in the log. According to the program, everything is working as it should...except that it isn't. George_ wrote: > > It shouldn't compile, I left the parts out to keep it reasonably short. As > far as

Re: ragged-last-bottom doesn't take

2011-12-10 Thread George_
Xavier Scheuer wrote: > > I think the \pageBreak at the end of the score *is* interfering (I did > not check, maybe I would have if the code was self-compilable without > I have to "imagine" a way to complete the missing variables). > > Why are you using \pageBreak at the end of the score and n

Re: Footnotes documentation

2011-12-10 Thread George_
pkx166h-2 wrote: > > George, > > On 30 November 2011 22:16, George Xu wrote: > >> Oops, sorry. 2.14.2. I guess that explains why \auto-footnote doesn't >> work, but it doesn't help much... >> >> > In the latest 'development' version > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/cr

Re: Need a new articulation glyph...

2011-12-10 Thread George_
The snippet that David linked to was too complicated for me to edit effectively, so what I've done as a temporary solution is I've combined a couple other snippets and used the mensural custos as a fill-in glyph: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=4 http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=378 to ma

Appoggiatura appears between two repeats

2011-12-11 Thread George_
http://old.nabble.com/file/p32957263/Untitled.jpg What I want is for the appoggiatura to be on the same side of the double bar line as the D#. What I wrote looks something like what is below (at the end). As you can see I've put the volta repeats only into the top part. Up until now it's worked

Re: Appoggiatura appears between two repeats

2011-12-11 Thread George_
Damn. Really should have seen that. Thanks. Xavier Scheuer wrote: > > On 12 December 2011 00:30, George_ wrote: >> >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p32957263/Untitled.jpg >> >> What I want is for the appoggiatura to be on the same side of the double >> bar &

Re: Moving notes re: text within markup

2012-08-05 Thread George_
Thanks for the reply! -Eluze wrote: > > please try to structure your code - the machine can read this code, but > for humans this is very hard (and the result of the compilation doesn't > change if it's written on one or more line(s) ! Sorry, I thought markups all had to be one line... it cou

Re: Sibelius Software UK office shuts down

2012-08-06 Thread George_
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: > > On 5 août 2012, at 12:37, Joseph Rushton Wakeling > wrote: > >> On 02/08/12 17:51, Graham Percival wrote: >>> In short: if there is a concerted effort to create a "quick >>> render" output, I would be absolutely shocked if it wasn't at >>> least 10 times faster

Re: Sibelius Software UK office shuts down

2012-08-06 Thread George_
Tim Roberts wrote: > > George_ wrote: >> WRT (1): Someone in this thread suggested using individual threads to >> render >> a bar at a time. The end result would be messy, but what if one or two >> threads were dedicated to running 'behind' the main thr

Re: Sibelius Software UK office shuts down

2012-08-06 Thread George_
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling > wrote: >> On 06/08/12 20:26, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >>> >>> Also, going MT will give you a max 8x speedup (assuming perfect >>> parallelization on an 8 core machine). That is not going to bring down >>> pro

Re: Sibelius Software UK office shuts down

2012-08-06 Thread George_
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:56 PM, George_ wrote: >> The reason this is important is because while IPC goes up incrementally >> and >> relatively slowly (IPC has done little more than double between 2005 [P4 >> 660] and now [i7 3930X])

Re: Sibelius Software UK office shuts down

2012-08-06 Thread George_
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:50 AM, George_ wrote: > >>> I'm trying to explain that the constant factor (namely 8-fold) comes >>> at a tremendous cost. Writing multithreaded code without getting stuck >>> in race-conditions

Re: Accompaniment of accordion (accords)

2012-08-26 Thread George_
Capital letters underneath the chords denote the tonic of the chord. Lower-case notation above the chord indicate the type of chord: just the note itself is the major chord (e.g. d denotes a D-major chord), note followed by m is minor, and note followed by 7 is either dominant or diminished 7th (I

Colliding dynamics with barlines

2012-09-10 Thread George_
I've noticed, especially with dynamics like \ff and \pp, that a small amount of the dynamic collides with bar lines in a PianoStaff if it is attached to a note at the beginning of the bar. The problem is worse with longer dynamics like \p. This is not an issue if the note is at the beginning of

Re: Colliding dynamics with barlines

2012-09-10 Thread George_
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dynamic-barline-collisions-td20928.html I notice that this has been reported before , though I'm not sure what's been done with it in the last 5 years. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Colliding-dynamics-with-barlines-t