Re: Different default arpeggio positions

Le 01/12/2022 à 07:08, Abraham Lee a écrit : Happy Holidays! A number of versions ago, I created the following function to extend the top and bottom ends of the Arpeggio grob, which I find more aesthetically pleasing (generally), though I know it's not perfect: \override Arpeggio.after-lin

Re: Different default arpeggio positions

At 23:08 on 30 Nov 2022, Abraham Lee wrote: > Happy Holidays! > A number of versions ago, I created the following function to extend > the top and bottom ends of the Arpeggio grob, which I find more > aesthetically pleasing (generally), though I know it's not perfect: Can you not just use \offs

Re: Different default arpeggio positions

Hi Jean, Am Do., 1. Dez. 2022 um 09:48 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra : > This is a widespread but bad coding pattern that I regularly advise > against on this list :-) you'll find a plethora of snippets in the archives using after-line-breaking authored by me. Likely starting in 2.12.3. > It seem

Re: Different default arpeggio positions

Le 01/12/2022 à 10:09, Thomas Morley a écrit : Ofcourse you're right advertising not to use after-line-breaking for all and everything. Though, I do understand why it's still in use. Yes, sure. My point was to advise against it, not to rebuke people who have used / are using it. Indeed, bef

Spacing between stanzas

Hi all: I used \addlyrics { \override VerticalAxisGroup.nonstaff-nonstaff-spacing.basic-distance = #4 and achieved the effect I wanted. But only for the last line of music. The other lines were unaffected. Is there a way I can get the spacing for each line of music?

Re: Different default arpeggio positions

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 2:13 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > Le 01/12/2022 à 10:09, Thomas Morley a écrit : > > Ofcourse you're right advertising not to use after-line-breaking for > > all and everything. > > Though, I do understand why it's still in use. > > > > Yes, sure. My point was to advise aga

Re: Adding text to chord names or note names (replies to discussion)

Hello Jean, Elaine, > Amusingly, I found this post from 2001: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-music-discuss/2001-03/msg00327.html > > (The thread continues here: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-music-discuss/2001-04/msg0.html) ​ Ha, that's funny indeed. I'd say I completel

Re: Adding text to chord names or note names (solution)

Hello, (Separately reply follows to some of the specific things that were written.) In case there is interest, what I did now was tweaking the Current_chord_text_engraver from scheme_engravers.scm. It simply takes the first pitch specified in a chord as the root, takes the first one with proper

Re: Adding text to chord names or note names (solution)

Le 01/12/2022 à 19:04, Koen van Walstijn a écrit : Hello, (Separately reply follows to some of the specific things that were written.) In case there is interest, what I did now was tweaking the Current_chord_text_engraver from scheme_engravers.scm. It simply takes the first pitch specified

Re: Adding text to chord names or note names (solution)

Le 01/12/2022 à 19:04, Koen van Walstijn a écrit : Code can be found here: https://gitlab.com/kbvw/lilypond-tweaks/-/blob/master/harmonic-background.ly By the way: if you want to made a piece of code available that you think someone might want to reuse for LilyPond, you need to put it under

Re: Adding text to chord names or note names (solution)

Hi Jean, Thanks, indeed that's useful to know. (Still learning.) Sorry about that: I'll change it to GPLv3+ and open the issue on Gitlab. Cheers, Koen --- Original Message --- On Thursday, December 1st, 2022 at 8:31 PM, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > Le 01/12/2022 à 19:04, Koen van Walsti

lilypond-book -> latex

Hi. Carlos, from Brazil. I need package "lilypond-book->latex". How can I download it ? Thanks

Re: Different default arpeggio positions

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:49 AM Mark Knoop wrote: > > At 23:08 on 30 Nov 2022, Abraham Lee wrote: > > Happy Holidays! > > > A number of versions ago, I created the following function to extend > > the top and bottom ends of the Arpeggio grob, which I find more > > aesthetically pleasing (generally

Frescobaldi on Hi-res monitors

I apologize for the semi-off-topic, but is anyone who uses a hi-res monitor (i.e., 4K+) having the Music View display properly? For some reason, mine renders the page scaled down vertically about 25% shorter than it should be. It's tolerable, but annoying. Makes the normal PDF viewer look really we

"loco" after ottava

Piece of music I have in front of me puts the text "loco." above the first note after an ottava. See also the attached example, from . The code below does not work, which makes me suspect I do not in fact understand the spanner interface. (I tried to a

Re: Different default arpeggio positions

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 8:53 AM Abraham Lee wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 2:13 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > >> Le 01/12/2022 à 10:09, Thomas Morley a écrit : >> > Ofcourse you're right advertising not to use after-line-breaking for >> > all and everything. >> > Though, I do understand why i

Re: lilypond-book -> latex

> I need package "lilypond-book->latex". How can I download it ? If you have downloaded or installed LilyPond, you should already have the `lilypond-book` script. On the command line, say ``` lilypond-book --help ``` for a first overview of the available options; you need to add `--format=lat

Re: Frescobaldi on Hi-res monitors

Frescobaldi works fine for me on a 5K2K (5120x2160) 34 inch screen, in both Windows 11 and Linux in VM's. What OS are you using? Andrew On 2/12/2022 11:52 am, Abraham Lee wrote: I apologize for the semi-off-topic, but is anyone who uses a hi-res monitor (i.e., 4K+) having the Music View disp