Le 05/11/2021 à 23:09, David Kastrup a écrit :
I think one change should be that cross-staff needs to be more than a
flag. It rather needs to be a pair of staves identified in some manner
where distancing of any staff pairs in that interval will not involve
the cross-staff material, but it other
Hi Jean,
> In an ideal world of 'pushing' grobs, that would
> be written as something like
> ^\p
YES!!!
> but the \p should also be pushed or something
> should be done about it because of its direction.
For sure, there are potential complications…
> it's worth noting that the part combiner,
>
I' m using Brave. Version 1.31.88 Chromium: 95.0.4638.69 (Official
Build) (64-bit)
I enter https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/ and am redirected to
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/web/index.html
So far, so good. https: redirects to https:
I click Manuals and again, am taken to
https://l
> Am 06.11.2021 um 15:06 schrieb Kevin Cole :
>
> I click Learning Manual. Still good. https remains. I am now at
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/learning/index#top
>
> I click the search bar at the bottom of the green sidebar table of
> contents... And get a pop-up in red text:
On 06/11/2021 14:06, Kevin Cole wrote:
I click Learning Manual. Still good. https remains. I am now at
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/learning/index#top
I click the search bar at the bottom of the green sidebar table of
contents... And get a pop-up in red text:
"This form is not
Le 06/11/2021 à 14:47, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
[...]
Is there some gain to be had by considering the three related concepts —
“context pushing”, cross-staff items, and part-combining — together, to see
where a single mechanism might help all three? Put another (OOP-ish) way: Are
cross-staff
No more needed. Thanks.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
Il venerdì 5 novembre 2021 20:25, Thomas Morley ha
scritto:
> Am Fr., 5. Nov. 2021 um 09:50 Uhr schrieb Mahanidhi
> :
>
>> Hello,
>> I'm triyng to have the second line open at the end as the first. But with
>> repeats bar at the third l
I’ve done some work to clean up my code and also modified the interface to be
fairly intuitive and non-intrusive. Hopefully I’ll have some time this week to
integrate this into my project, but if anyone sees anything that could be
improved, I’d love to hear about it.
✝✝
Hello all,
> Now if what you want is really coding, there are
> heaps of open issues waiting for you. Here are a
> few that I believe (NB no warranty) would be feasible
> for a power user with some minimal understanding of
> Scheme:
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/794
> https://git
Le 06/11/2021 à 20:58, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
Hello all,
Now if what you want is really coding, there are
heaps of open issues waiting for you. Here are a
few that I believe (NB no warranty) would be feasible
for a power user with some minimal understanding of
Scheme:
https://gitlab.com/
Hi Kieren,
Am 06.11.21 um 20:58 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hello all,
Now if what you want is really coding, there are
heaps of open issues waiting for you. Here are a
few that I believe (NB no warranty) would be feasible
for a power user with some minimal understanding of
Scheme:
https://gitla
Hi,
I think that's too optimistic.
That's the gist; just some tiny corrections to make
sure Kieren knows what he will work on:
#686 certainly involves a bit of C++ programming (the command line is
evaluated in C++).
Not necessarily, options passed with -d and never
used in C++ are handled
Hello again,
I have a situation where I need to adjust the padding of an ottava
bracket after a line break. That is, I want to affect the bracket on
the second line, but not the first.
I know you can do something like this with the \shape function, but
what about brackets?
I tried this solution
Hi Knute,
> I have a situation where I need to adjust the padding of an ottava
> bracket after a line break. That is, I want to affect the bracket on
> the second line, but not the first.
Does \afterBreak not work with OttavaBracket.padding?
\relative {
\alterBroken #'padding #'(1 7) Staff.Ott
p.s.
> Does \afterBreak not work with OttavaBracket.padding?
um… \alterBroken (as in the snippet).
Sorry! — K
> \relative {
> \alterBroken #'padding #'(1 7) Staff.OttavaBracket
> \ottava 1 c1 \break
> c2 2
> }
Le 06/11/2021 à 22:01, Knute Snortum a écrit :
Hello again,
I have a situation where I need to adjust the padding of an ottava
bracket after a line break. That is, I want to affect the bracket on
the second line, but not the first.
I know you can do something like this with the \shape functi
\relative {
\alterBroken #'padding #'(1 7) Staff.OttavaBracket
\ottava 1 c1 \break
c2 2
}
I continue my lonely crusade against the hash-tick-combinations that I
found so daunting when I learned LilyPond and which are needed much less
often today:
\relative {
\alterBroken pad
On 2021-11-06 2:23 pm, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
\relative {
\alterBroken #'padding #'(1 7) Staff.OttavaBracket
\ottava 1 c1 \break
c2 2
}
I continue my lonely crusade against the hash-tick-combinations that I
found so daunting when I learned LilyPond and which are needed much
less
Since #'(1 7) is a list of numbers, you could write it this way:
\relative {
\alterBroken padding 1,7 Staff.OttavaBracket
\ottava 1 c1 \break
c2 2
}
Right, thanks! I had a feeling there was a way to do this using dak's
syntax enhancements but couldn't remember what it wa
On 2021-11-06 2:45 pm, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Since #'(1 7) is a list of numbers, you could write it this way:
\relative {
\alterBroken padding 1,7 Staff.OttavaBracket
\ottava 1 c1 \break
c2 2
}
Right, thanks! I had a feeling there was a way to do this using dak's
syntax
Hi Lukas,
> I continue my lonely crusade against the hash-tick-combinations
I generally remove them — I’m on the crusade with you! — tho’ on this
“fast-cut-and-paste job”, I didn’t. =(
That being said, there are certain circumstances in which I prefer keeping the
hashes, as they (IMO) help re
Le 2021-11-01 18:26, Stefan Thomas a écrit :
Dear community,
I would like to do with arranger.ly something similar to
Key = { \key f \major }
music =
{ \Key c'4 d' e' f'2.}
artiA = { s2.( s) }
music = { \context Voice << {\music} {\artiA } >> }
I tried in in the following way, without succes
Hello,
is it possible to set max-systems-per-page = X on the first page of the
score and = Y on the remaining pages?
thanks!
P
Le 07/11/2021 à 00:07, Paolo Prete a écrit :
is it possible to set max-systems-per-page = X on the first page of
the score and = Y on the remaining pages?
It isn't. The page breaker is not prepared to
handle this currently. You should insert explicit
breakpoints for the first page and define
sy
On 11/6/21, 3:24 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Lukas-Fabian Moser"
wrote:
> \relative {
>\alterBroken #'padding #'(1 7) Staff.OttavaBracket
>\ottava 1 c1 \break
> c2 2
> }
I continue my lonely crusade against the hash-tick-combinations that I
25 matches
Mail list logo
