I am new to MIDI output, so pardon me if a stupid question, but a
search of the user archives did not reveal anything.
According to the supported notation for MIDI in the NR, using \repeat
tremolo instead of :n works. Yet this MWE produces no tremolo in the
MIDI (as far as I can hear). What do I n
Greetings Andrew,
I use \unfoldRepeats in order to get any sort of repeat - including
tremolos - to work with midi.
New Complexity! I haven't heard that term since my school days. Pretty cool!
Hwaen Ch'uqi
On 10/7/20, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> I am new to MIDI output, so pardon me if a stupid q
Now that we’ve been talking about \shape and \shapeII, I would like to ask if
it’s possible that values put for \shape(II) could scale according to staff
size. Whenever I have a smaller staff, whatever values work for a 20 points
staff are too much for smaller staves (either with a smaller font
Thank you so much. Where is \unfoldRepeats in the NR? It entirely eludes me.
Andrew
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 19:34, Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
>
> Greetings Andrew,
>
> I use \unfoldRepeats in order to get any sort of repeat - including
> tremolos - to work with midi.
Ah. It's described in A.19 Available Music Functions. Hard to find
because not indexed.
Sorry for the noise.
Andrew
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 21:49, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
> Thank you so much. Where is \unfoldRepeats in the NR? It entirely eludes me.
> Where is \unfoldRepeats in the NR?
Its usage is described in section 3.5.6, “Using repeats with MIDI” –
it's also in the index...
Werner
> Ah. It's described in A.19 Available Music Functions. Hard to find
> because not indexed.
Really? In my locally generated PDF of the NR the entry in the
appendix *is* indexed.
Werner
> On 7 Oct 2020, at 09:54, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
> According to the supported notation for MIDI in the NR, using \repeat
> tremolo instead of :n works. Yet this MWE produces no tremolo in the
> MIDI (as far as I can hear). What do I need to add to make it work?
This is the method I found use
Il giorno mer 7 ott 2020 alle 13:12, Werner LEMBERG ha
scritto:
Ah. It's described in A.19 Available Music Functions. Hard to find
because not indexed.
Really? In my locally generated PDF of the NR the entry in the
appendix *is* indexed.
He probably searched at the U:
http://lily
Am 07.10.20 um 02:18 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> Urs and all,
>
> What happens to orphaned git repos? Not a case I am familiar with.
>
> I'd be happy to fork the OLL repo and take over the management and
> development. Should I do that? Are you going to delete the existing
> repo?
>
> Andrew
>
Hi And
Well, despite two of today's statements arguing otherwise I must say I
have come to a different conclusion. I have given myself exactly two
weeks to make a determination, and I realized I have obviously
overestimated the value and impact of my pet project openLilyLib. The
two weeks until yesterday
Il giorno mer 7 ott 2020 alle 16:24, Jean Abou Samra
ha scritto:
PPS: I see you shut down openlilylib.org. Is the source archived
somewhere
so I can better understand openLilyLib?
I think it's here:
https://github.com/openlilylib-documentation/main-site/
Le 07/10/2020 à 16:30, Federico Bruni a écrit :
Il giorno mer 7 ott 2020 alle 16:24, Jean Abou Samra
ha scritto:
PPS: I see you shut down openlilylib.org. Is the source archived
somewhere
so I can better understand openLilyLib?
I think it's here:
https://github.com/openlilylib-documentati
Hi. I'm hoping to get some input from this wonderful group.
It seems that repeat volta and \barNumberCheck don't work well
together when you use the \alternative function. If you put a
\barNumberCheck inside of a repeat volta, the \braNumberCheck fails
all the time. I think it's because when y
Le 05/10/2020 à 22:32, Pierre Perol-Schneider a écrit :
Yes Jean, this is exactly the type of example I was looking for.
Thank you!
It should be added to:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/other#index-_005cwith_002ddimensions
and to:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Document
Hello Aaron,
I did find an issue with your syllable function. It seems to swallow up
dots, that is, if I take your sample code
\syllable { a'\( \melisma c'' b'\tenuto \melismaEnd }
and add a dot, it is ignored. I am playing around with an episema vs. dot.
\syllable { a'4.\( \melisma c'' b'\tenuto
Now that we’ve been talking about \shape and \shapeII, I would like to
ask if it’s possible that values put for \shape(II) could scale
according to staff size. Whenever I have a smaller staff, whatever
values work for a 20 points staff are too much for smaller staves
(either with a smaller font
Hello Jean,
thanks for further exploring the first request. In my experience with Lilypond
2.20 \shape doesn’t scale with set-global-staff-size either. I’m already kinda
“used” to writing smaller values —my primitive math only cooperated with me
today to figure that I can use fractions to easil
On 2020-10-07 8:44 am, Matthew Fong wrote:
Hello Aaron,
I did find an issue with your syllable function. It seems to swallow up
dots, that is, if I take your sample code
\syllable { a'\( \melisma c'' b'\tenuto \melismaEnd }
and add a dot, it is ignored. I am playing around with an episema vs.
Le 07/10/2020 à 18:58, Martín Rincón Botero a écrit :
Hello Jean,
thanks for further exploring the first request. In my experience with
Lilypond 2.20 \shape doesn’t scale with set-global-staff-size either.
I’m already kinda “used” to writing smaller values —my primitive math
only cooperated
Hello Aaron,
You're quite right. I don't need to alter the note duration in the scope --
it's simply a graphical articulation I wish to add, like the tenuto.
I actually do prefer the first solution. The second one for falsobordone
(or current problem). I suppose I could also use markup on the not
Le 07/10/2020 à 19:50, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 07/10/2020 à 18:58, Martín Rincón Botero a écrit :
Hello Jean,
thanks for further exploring the first request. In my experience with
Lilypond 2.20 \shape doesn’t scale with set-global-staff-size either.
I’m already kinda “used” to writing
Has anybody written a script to find the highest and lowest notes in a
part or a score etc?
Andrew
On 2020-10-07 5:00 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Has anybody written a script to find the highest and lowest notes in a
part or a score etc?
Seems like something the Ambitus_engraver would help with.
In what format do you need the information?
-- Aaron Hill
I should add that I use absolute pitch notation exclusively, which
makes this an easier proposition for textual processing.
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 11:00, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
> Has anybody written a script to find the highest and lowest notes in a
> part or a score etc?
I just need the highest and lowest note, text, is all.
The rationale behind this is that I have set a New Complexity score for
a newly developed Clarinet D'Amore, which has a wider range than
clarinet, and few, if any sampled clarinet VST instruments go beyond a
textbook clarinet range, which
Thanks Aaron - that's perfect!
Never had need of that before. A great function.
Andrew
On 8/10/2020 11:22 am, Aaron Hill wrote:
Seems like something the Ambitus_engraver would help with.
On 2020-10-07 11:03 am, Matthew Fong wrote:
I suppose I could also use markup on the note if it's
a graphical articulation?
I can think of four ways to decorate a note:
\version "2.20.0"
decoMarkup = \markup \circle \normalsize \normal-text !
decoDynamic = #(make-dynamic-script decoMarku
On 2020-10-07 5:37 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I just need the highest and lowest note, text, is all.
From within LilyPond, something like this might work:
\version "2.20.0"
displayPitchRange =
#(define-music-function
(music)
(ly:music?)
(let ((pitches (music-pitches music)))
(se
Try engrave this ly code:
\version "2.20.0"
>
> \header {
> title = \markup \column {
>\line { "Minuet" }
>\line { "" }
>\line { "" }
> }
> subtitle = "A study in accent and in the correct timing of half beats"
> }
>
{s}
By lilypond v2.20.0:
[image: image.png]
By lilypond v2
If you use { " " } you will get a blank line, in 2.21.6. I don't know about
other versions, I only use one.
Andrew
On 2020-10-07 8:20 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
If you use { " " } you will get a blank line, in 2.21.6. I don't know
about
other versions, I only use one.
Something else must be going on, as I cannot reproduce the claimed
behavior.
I am seeing consistently that \line { "" } results in an empt
I dont think it's a 2. Looks more like some kind of symbol. I am not a
scholar of that period.
Andrew
On 2020-10-07 11:07 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I dont think it's a 2. Looks more like some kind of symbol. I am not a
scholar of that period.
Not a scholar either, but a quick web search turned up this [1].
[1]:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_Music_and_Musicians/Proportion
C2
34 matches
Mail list logo
