Re: Frescobaldi testing requested

2018-09-08 Thread Partitura Organum
On 7-9-2018 09:48, Urs Liska wrote: Please pull and checkout the branch dev/urs/refactor-job-test-windows. This includes two test prints on the command line to check what code is actually reached and the value(s) of some variables. Is anything printed with that when you use Engrave (custom)

Re: Extend Whiteout property

2018-09-08 Thread foxfanfare
Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote > I took this as an intencive to take a stab at delving into the source > code (which I always did read-only up to now). I think I managed to > create a working branch from current master (I also never got the hang > of git...) that allows for > > \version "2.21" > > \

Re: Extend Whiteout property

2018-09-08 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Hi Harm, Is there a way that one of the more experienced developers might take a look at what I produced at help me in getting it up to scratch? A look at what you did would be helpful. ;) Could you post a git formated patch? Or a diff? Good idea - thanks for the suggestion! A diff is what I

changing the length (height? positions? endpoints?) of an arpeggio

2018-09-08 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hello! I’m trying to tweak the "length" of an arpeggio (by 1 staff space at the top), and can’t seem to find the correct incantation or doc reference. %%% MWE begins \version "2.19.80" { 1\arpeggio } %%% MWE ends Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Kieren. ___

changing the length (height? positions? endpoints?) of an arpeggio

2018-09-08 Thread Noeck
Hi Kieren, > \version "2.19.80" > { 1\arpeggio } you can set the positions by hand (in staff spaces): { 1\arpeggio \once \override Staff.Arpeggio.positions = #'(-3 . 0) 1\arpeggio } Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gn

Re: changing the length (height? positions? endpoints?) of an arpeggio

2018-09-08 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
Kieren MacMillan wrote > I’m trying to tweak the "length" of an arpeggio (by 1 staff space at the > top), and can’t seem to find the correct incantation or doc reference. Hi Kieren, You can explicitly set an arpeggio's start/end positions by overriding the positions property. The internals refer

Re: changing the length (height? positions? endpoints?) of an arpeggio

2018-09-08 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Joram, > you can set the positions by hand (in staff spaces): Well, I had tried that in my real-world (non-MWE) example… but it didn’t seem to work: \version "2.19.80" upper = { \time 3/4 2.\arpeggio \once \override Staff.Arpeggio.positions = #'(3 . -12) 2.\arpeggio \once \override

Re: changing the length (height? positions? endpoints?) of an arpeggio

2018-09-08 Thread Thomas Morley
2018-09-08 22:15 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan : > Hi Joram, > >> you can set the positions by hand (in staff spaces): > > Well, I had tried that in my real-world (non-MWE) example… but it didn’t seem > to work: > > \version "2.19.80" > > upper = { > \time 3/4 > 2.\arpeggio > \once \override Sta

Re: changing the length (height? positions? endpoints?) of an arpeggio

2018-09-08 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Torsten, > You can explicitly set an arpeggio's start/end positions by overriding the > positions property. See my response to Joram, and the bug (?) regarding that. > this function can be used in a custom scheme function just subtracting a given > amount from the lower value and adding the s

Re: changing the length (height? positions? endpoints?) of an arpeggio

2018-09-08 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Harm, > You need to go for > \once \override _PianoStaff_.Arpeggio.positions = #'(-3 . 12) I tried that, of course… > NB the first value of the pair is the lower end! > Thus '(3 . -12) wouldn't print anything. Ah! That’s why it wasn’t working. D’oh! > Or use \offset > \once \offset position

buggy grace

2018-09-08 Thread Mátyás Seress
Hi all, today I found a rather odd spacing of the grace notes. Check this code: \score { \relative c'' { \time 3/8 g4. \grace { fis16 g } } } I'm running 2.18.2. As you can see in the attachment, the grace notes which according to the manual "take up no additional logical

Re: buggy grace

2018-09-08 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Maybe it is \afterGrace that you are looking for: \afterGrace g4. { fis16 g } Craig On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 07:03, Mátyás Seress wrote: > Hi all, > > today I found a rather odd spacing of the grace notes. Check this code: > > \score { > \relative c'' { > \time 3/8 > g4. \gr

Re: buggy grace

2018-09-08 Thread Mátyás Seress
Yes, that solved it, thanks Craig! 2018-09-08 23:10 GMT+02:00 Craig Dabelstein : > Maybe it is \afterGrace that you are looking for: > > \afterGrace g4. { fis16 g } > > Craig > > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 07:03, Mátyás Seress wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> today I found a rather odd spacing of the gra

Re: buggy grace

2018-09-08 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 08.09.2018 22:23, Mátyás Seress wrote: \score {     \relative c'' {         \time 3/8         g4. \grace { fis16 g }     } } I'm running 2.18.2. As you can see in the attachment, the grace notes which according to the manual "take up no additional logical time in a measure" apparently do so