Am 11.07.2014 07:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
tisimst writes:
All,
Is there anyone who is VERY against distributing music fonts in binary form
(i.e., as otf, svg, etc.files)? I just don't see how we can make other music
fonts available by forcing them to have a metafont source file. I guess tha
Urs Liska writes:
> I think the "cleanest" way with the least hassles (and maybe
> discussion) would be to integrate into LilyPond the _possibility_ to
> switch fonts (e.g. Abraham's functions) and provide the fonts
> independently.
I think the salient point is to provide the infrastructure wher
Am 11.07.2014 09:10, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
I think the "cleanest" way with the least hassles (and maybe
discussion) would be to integrate into LilyPond the _possibility_ to
switch fonts (e.g. Abraham's functions) and provide the fonts
independently.
I think the salient poi
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 11.07.2014 09:10, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> I think the "cleanest" way with the least hassles (and maybe
>>> discussion) would be to integrate into LilyPond the _possibility_ to
>>> switch fonts (e.g. Abraham's functions) and provide the fonts
>>>
Am 11.07.2014 09:20, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 11.07.2014 09:10, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
I think the "cleanest" way with the least hassles (and maybe
discussion) would be to integrate into LilyPond the _possibility_ to
switch fonts (e.g. Abraham's functio
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 11.07.2014 09:20, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 11.07.2014 09:10, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
> I think the "cleanest" way with the least hassles (and maybe
> discussion) would be to integrate into LilyPond the _possi
Am 11.07.2014 09:29, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 11.07.2014 09:20, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 11.07.2014 09:10, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
I think the "cleanest" way with the least hassles (and maybe
discussion) would be to integrate into
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 11.07.2014 09:29, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 11.07.2014 09:20, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 11.07.2014 09:10, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> I think the "cleanest" way with the leas
On 11/07/14 08:01, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 11.07.2014 07:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> tisimst writes:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Is there anyone who is VERY against distributing music fonts in
>>> binary form
>>> (i.e., as otf, svg, etc.files)? I just don't see how we can make
>>> other music
>>> fonts av
Am 11.07.2014 10:16, schrieb James:
On 11/07/14 08:01, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 11.07.2014 07:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
tisimst writes:
All,
Is there anyone who is VERY against distributing music fonts in
binary form
(i.e., as otf, svg, etc.files)? I just don't see how we can make
other music
f
Dear all,
I like to use the Romande ADF font family [1] in one of my scores. I do
the usual rule-of-three with
\paper { ... (make-pango-font-tree
"Romande ADF No2 Std" "Romande ADF Std" "monospace"
(/ myStaffSize 20)) ... }
(If you wonder, No2 is condensed, a
Federico Bruni writes:
> We are talking about a forum in a language other than english, I don't
> see any overlap with this mailing list. If I understand what you
> mean...
I'm just afraid that interesting topics posted in one list will escapes
the others.
Well, let's see...
A final hint: Sett
Does anybody have experience about overriding existing partcombine
methods? I have a score that behave like the one below:
- When both voices have identical rests, use partcombineUnisonoOnce
- Use partcombineApart for everything else
In the snippet below, the second line represents what I intende
Hi Urs,
it seems like I missed something. How did you create those scores? Using
Abrahams proposed tools? Are they public? Or did you do that with your
own magic?
I would also be interested to test these features.
I have clear preferences when I look at the fonts you compared here. It
is also int
Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
now there definitely seems to be something wrong with mail delivery on the list.
Agreed. I had reported similar trouble with other forums'
email, but now only LilyPond's hasn't returned to normal.
Pete
___
lilypond-use
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:52:13 +0100
Richard Shann wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> With notation like
> \version "2.18.0"
> \chordmode {
> c/g
> }
> I can get chord names with /G at the end to indicate a G added
> below the root of the chord.
> With the notation
> \new ChordNames
> {
> 1
> }
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:52:13 +0100
Richard Shann wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> With notation like
> \version "2.18.0"
> \chordmode {
> c/g
> }
> I can get chord names with /G at the end to indicate a G added
> below the root of the chord.
> With the notation
> \new ChordNames
> {
> 1
> }
2014-07-11 13:56 GMT+02:00 Abel Cheung :
> Does anybody have experience about overriding existing partcombine
> methods? I have a score that behave like the one below:
>
> - When both voices have identical rests, use partcombineUnisonoOnce
> - Use partcombineApart for everything else
>
> In the sni
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Abraham Lee wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:39 AM, James Harkins
> wrote:
>
> Something I've been wondering about for awhile... lilypond.org boasts of
> "optical spacing" for notes with alternating up and down stems, but it
> seems this feature has been lost s
Yes, this is exactly what I needed, thanks a lot!
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> 2014-07-11 13:56 GMT+02:00 Abel Cheung :
>> Does anybody have experience about overriding existing partcombine
>> methods? I have a score that behave like the one below:
>>
>> - When both voi
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:09 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Abraham Lee
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:39 AM, James Harkins
wrote:
Something I've been wondering about for awhile... lilypond.org
boasts of "optical spacing" for notes with alternating up and do
On 11 July 2014 15:08, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>
>
> Maybe this will help you:
>
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/tree/master/editorial-tools/merge-rests-engraver
Hi Janek,
Could this definition of Merge Rests Engraver (latest by Jay Anderson)
be included directly in LilyPond?
AFAICS it
Abraham Lee writes:
>> Equally spaced stems do look nice with groupings that change staff
>> constantly, however. I remember that SCORE had a feature that
>> enabled this. I've often thought that LilyPond should have this
>> option, but haven't studied the problem enough to know how it could
>>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:00 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Abraham Lee writes:
Equally spaced stems do look nice with groupings that change staff
constantly, however. I remember that SCORE had a feature that
enabled this. I've often thought that LilyPond should have this
option, but haven't
For chord charts a barline is wanted at the start of each line of music
- \bar "|" is, of course ignored in this position.
Can anyone suggest how to force printing a barline here (after the time
signature, if any).
Incidentally, the documentation is slightly misleading on this point:
http://www.l
It is somewhat embarrassing to reply to one's own question but:
\defineBarLine "|" #'("|" "|" "|")
does the trick.
Richard
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 17:49 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> For chord charts a barline is wanted at the start of each line of music
> - \bar "|" is, of course ignored in thi
On 11/07/14 18:00, Richard Shann wrote:
It is somewhat embarrassing to reply to one's own question but:
\defineBarLine "|" #'("|" "|" "|")
does the trick.
Richard
So do we need to improve the documentation?
If so, what do you suggest?
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation
At 16:07 11/07/2014 +0006, Abraham Lee wrote:
Maybe just me, but I don't really like the look of that. I see the
stems are equidistant, but, at least to me, I feel like it's not
balanced and it makes the notehead spacing a little awkward... I'd
still rather see the default behavior. But we all
Noeck wrote
> Hi Urs,
>
> it seems like I missed something. How did you create those scores? Using
> Abrahams proposed tools? Are they public? Or did you do that with your
> own magic?
> I would also be interested to test these features.
>
> I have clear preferences when I look at the fonts you c
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 18:11 +0100, James wrote:
> On 11/07/14 18:00, Richard Shann wrote:
> > It is somewhat embarrassing to reply to one's own question but:
> >
> > \defineBarLine "|" #'("|" "|" "|")
> >
> > does the trick.
> >
> > Richard
> So do we need to improve the documentation?
>
> If so,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Brian Barker
wrote:
> At 16:07 11/07/2014 +0006, Abraham Lee wrote:
>
>> Maybe just me, but I don't really like the look of that. I see the stems
>> are equidistant, but, at least to me, I feel like it's not balanced and it
>> makes the notehead spacing a little
2014-07-11 21:14 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann :
> On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 18:11 +0100, James wrote:
>> On 11/07/14 18:00, Richard Shann wrote:
>> > It is somewhat embarrassing to reply to one's own question but:
>> >
>> > \defineBarLine "|" #'("|" "|" "|")
>> >
>> > does the trick.
>> >
>> > Richard
>> So
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:18 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Brian Barker
> wrote:
>
>> At 16:07 11/07/2014 +0006, Abraham Lee wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe just me, but I don't really like the look of that. I see the stems
>>> are equidistant, but, at least to me, I fe
Am 11.07.2014 18:49, schrieb Richard Shann:
For chord charts a barline is wanted at the start of each line of music
- \bar "|" is, of course ignored in this position.
Can anyone suggest how to force printing a barline here (after the time
signature, if any).
Incidentally, the documentation is s
Hello list,
I've been trying to create several choral scores using the same
template, but sometimes I need to change just a small part of the
template, so I end up copying the original and naming it style_two.ily
or style_piecename.ily etc. For example, in one piece I need to shrink
the PianoStaff
35 matches
Mail list logo
