>> The usage manual however (section 4.4) tells me to do this:
>>
>> lilypond -dbackend=eps \
>>-dno-gs-load-fonts \
>>-dinclude-eps-fonts \
>>--png \
>>-dresolution=1200 \
>>figure.ly
>>
>> That results in a png that is too wide. Ther
Hi,
I believe I've just discovered a bug.
Running the development version of lily
(2.17.5, commit bc4b56a8dee39a1fa3f40ac329ab0754d46fc56f )
the following snippet produces two notes next to each other, without any
visible barline at all. See the attached image.
I checked it in the current documen
Hi, fellow lily users:
I am executing lilypond by Frescobaldi. How to specify lilypond options, eg
--png in Frescobaldi (not as command-line)?
Blessing in+,
Ming___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
Il 03/11/2012 13:27, MING TSANG ha scritto:
Hi, fellow lily users:
I am executing lilypond by Frescobaldi. How to specify lilypond options,
eg --png in Frescobaldi (not as command-line)?
Blessing in+,
Ming
Use the custom compilation in the LilyPond menu
___
And - 2.16.0 is free of this bug.
J.
2012/11/3 Jakub Pavlík
> Hi,
>
> I believe I've just discovered a bug.
> Running the development version of lily
> (2.17.5, commit bc4b56a8dee39a1fa3f40ac329ab0754d46fc56f )
>
> the following snippet produces two notes next to each other, without any
> visi
2012/11/3 Jakub Pavlík :
> And - 2.16.0 is free of this bug.
>
> J.
>
>
>
> 2012/11/3 Jakub Pavlík
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I believe I've just discovered a bug.
>> Running the development version of lily
>> (2.17.5, commit bc4b56a8dee39a1fa3f40ac329ab0754d46fc56f )
>>
>> the following snippet produces two
On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:45 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Paul Morris writes:
>
>> On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
>>
>> That worked to avoid the error, but didn't seem quite right (since it
>> didn't seem to matter what values you fed it). So I checked the
>> LilyPond source code
Ok.
I'm sorry for the noise
and thankful for the explanation.
Jakub
2012/11/3 Thomas Morley
> 2012/11/3 Jakub Pavlík :
> > And - 2.16.0 is free of this bug.
> >
> > J.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/3 Jakub Pavlík
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I believe I've just discovered a bug.
> >> Running the develop
Thomas Morley writes:
> no bug, but the barline-interface is heavily changed with 2.17.5.
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/changes-big-page.html
>
> It's now very easy to define own custom-BarLines.
>
> But there was need to change several strings.
> ":" is now used _only_ for repeat
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Olivier Biot wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Eluze wrote:
>> shutterfreak wrote
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to have a function to translate a key signature into the
>>> textual representation of that key in 3 languages.
>>>
>>> For instance, I'd write t
2012/11/1 Olivier Biot :
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a way to display and increment bar numbers only after a double bar?
[...]
Hi Olivier,
why not use RehearsalMark?
\version "2.17.5"
barMark = { \bar "||" \mark \default }
\relative c' {
\set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-circle-number
2012/11/3 David Kastrup :
[...]
>
> The convert-ly rules for 2.17.5 state
>
> str = re.sub (barstring + r'":"', '\\1\\2";"', str)
>
> which is not really related to "!". Is this an oversight?
No.
Rereading Jakub's initial mail, I think he confused dotted with dashed.
In 2.16.0 ":" was used
Olivier Biot writes:
> I definitely have problems with Scheme and LilyPond interpretation. I
> now have the Scheme standard open as well.
>
> I tried to simplify the initial job by first creating a function with
> one string argument returning either a string or a markup. Does not
> work.
>
> I t
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2012/11/1 Olivier Biot :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is there a way to display and increment bar numbers only after a double bar?
> [...]
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> why not use RehearsalMark?
[...]
> A function is possible, too:
[...]
>
> HTH,
> Harm
Hi Thom
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Olivier Biot writes:
>
>> I definitely have problems with Scheme and LilyPond interpretation. I
>> now have the Scheme standard open as well.
>>
>> I tried to simplify the initial job by first creating a function with
>> one string argument r
2012/11/3 Olivier Biot :
[...}
> Now I only need to devise a way to emulate the double bar at the start
> of each score line.
After an idea of Mats Bengtsson:
\version "2.17.5"
doubledSystemStartBar =
\override Score.SystemStartBar #'stencil =
#(lambda (grob)
(ly:grob-set-property! grob 'c
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2012/11/3 Olivier Biot :
> [...}
>> Now I only need to devise a way to emulate the double bar at the start
>> of each score line.
>
> After an idea of Mats Bengtsson:
[...]
Thank you again Thomas, this does exactly what I wanted! I wouldn't
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Olivier Biot wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks a lot - I now start to see the mistakes I made (excess
> parentheses around the cond expression and excess parentheses around
> the return values in the cond sub expressions).
>
> I have however to use quotes around the not
Paul Morris writes:
> On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:45 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Paul Morris writes:
>>
>>> On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
>>>
>>> That worked to avoid the error, but didn't seem quite right (since it
>>> didn't seem to matter what values you fed it). So I checke
Olivier Biot writes:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Olivier Biot wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thanks a lot - I now start to see the mistakes I made (excess
>> parentheses around the cond expression and excess parentheses around
>> the return values in the cond sub expressions).
>>
>> I have howe
Am 02.11.2012 01:20, schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> On 2012-11-01 22:54, Eluze wrote:
>> Janek Warchoł-2 wrote
>>> This may sound surprising, but there are many cases when LilyPond's
>>> vertical spacing could be noticeably improved (i admit that most of
>>> these cases would matter only to a demand
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 7:35 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Olivier Biot writes:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Olivier Biot wrote:
>>
>> What I now need to figure out, is how to print the output in a markup,
>> like in the currently not working snippets below:
>>
>> %%% START of snippet 2
>> \
On 2012-11-03 22:32, Noeck wrote:
Am 02.11.2012 01:20, schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
On 2012-11-01 22:54, Eluze wrote:
Janek Warchoł-2 wrote
This may sound surprising, but there are many cases when LilyPond's
vertical spacing could be noticeably improved (i admit that most of
these cases would m
23 matches
Mail list logo
