The beams on the two e's are omitted in this tiny example (version 2.15.36).
\relative c' { r8 \hideNotes f8 \unHideNotes e8. e16 e2 }
The beams are *not* omitted in this tiny example.
\relative c' { r4 e8. e16 e2 }
I realize this isn't latest stable -- I'm in the middle of a project and want
James Harkins wrote Friday, September 28, 2012 8:08 AM
> The beams on the two e's are omitted in this tiny example (version 2.15.36).
>
> \relative c' { r8 \hideNotes f8 \unHideNotes e8. e16 e2 }
>
>
> The beams are *not* omitted in this tiny example.
>
> \relative c' { r4 e8. e16 e2 }
>
>
James Harkins writes:
> The beams on the two e's are omitted in this tiny example (version 2.15.36).
>
> \relative c' { r8 \hideNotes f8 \unHideNotes e8. e16 e2 }
\once\hideNotes does not help, but after applying the patch for
Issue 2717 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2717>
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "LilyPond User Group"
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music?
Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:02 PM
The code below produces the image attac
Phil Holmes wrote Friday, September 28, 2012 9:40 AM
>> Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:02 PM
>>
>>> The code below produces the image attached. As can be seen, using a
>>> StaffGroup with mensural staves places the lyrics above the top stave,
>>> and I
>>> can't find an over-r
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> Phil Holmes wrote Friday, September 28, 2012 9:40 AM
>
>>> Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:02 PM
>>>
The code below produces the image attached. As can be seen, using a
StaffGroup with mensural staves places the lyrics above the top stave,
>
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "LilyPond User Group"
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music?
Phil Holmes wrote Friday, September 28, 2012 9:40 AM
Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, September 27, 2
Hello list,
in my current score, there are long, consecutive lists of notes with
articulations (dashes) in parentheses. Now it would improve readability
a lot if the first of these parenthesized dashes has only a
parenthesis-open, the last has only a parenthesis-close, and the rest
has a regu
On 28/09/2012 12:06, Rutger Hofman wrote:
> in my current score, there are long, consecutive lists of notes with
> articulations (dashes) in parentheses. Now it would improve
> readability a lot if the first of these parenthesized dashes has only
> a parenthesis-open, the last has only a parenthesi
On 09/28/2012 01:34 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
On 28/09/2012 12:06, Rutger Hofman wrote:
in my current score, there are long, consecutive lists of notes with
articulations (dashes) in parentheses. Now it would improve
readability a lot if the first of these parenthesized dashes has only
a par
2012/9/28 Oscar Dub :
> The scheme required is a lot clearer to me now and works exactly as I
> wanted. I really appreciate the advice.
Glad to hear that.
[...]
> Looking at the code being referred to, the issue seems to be with the
> eps->stencil function. Trying with other .eps files from diff
Hello,
2012/9/28 Trevor Daniels
> James Harkins wrote Friday, September 28, 2012 8:08 AM
> > The beams on the two e's are omitted in this tiny example (version
> 2.15.36).
> > \relative c' { r8 \hideNotes f8 \unHideNotes e8. e16 e2 }
> > The beams are *not* omitted in this tiny example.
> > \r
12 matches
Mail list logo