On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, James wrote:
Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ?
You need to talk to the/a Fedora Maintainer to get them to package it.
No one as far as I know who contributes to the LP project does this
actively.
I'm not that technically savvy on this topic, but
Hi,
thanks to all who responded to my posts.
>
> One of the best way to use lilypond-book with TeXShop is to use a dedicated
> "engine". Nicola Vitacolonna, a lilypond and LaTeX user, made a very
> interesting one. You can find it here :
>
> http://users.dimi.uniud.it/~nicola.vitacolonna/home/
2012/4/30 James :
> Martin,
>
> On 29 April 2012 17:28, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ?
>
> You need to talk to the/a Fedora Maintainer to get them to package it.
No Fedora maintainer can package LilyPond 2.16 if it has not been
re
Hello,
On 30 April 2012 10:16, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/4/30 James :
>> Martin,
>>
>> On 29 April 2012 17:28, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ?
>>
>> You need to talk to the/a Fedora Maintainer to get them to package it.
>
>
Nick,
> In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
>> stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil was
>> there:
>>
>> \version "2.15.37"
>>
>> \relative c'' {
>>\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
>>\override TupletBracket #'stenc
Quoting James :
'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in
Fedora 17'
Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently. In my understanding,
it means that the maintainer believes that a new stable version of
Lilypond will be released before or shortly after Fedora
Hi again,
> Since the number is positioned according to where the bracket would be,
> you could override 'positions of TupletBracket:
>
> \relative c'' {
>\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
>\times 2/3 {
> g8 fis g
> \override TupletBracket #'positions = #'(3.34
Pavel Roskin writes:
> Quoting James :
>
>> 'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in
>> Fedora 17'
>
> Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently. In my understanding,
> it means that the maintainer believes that a new stable version of
> Lilypond will be released
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in
Fedora 17'
Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently.
That sounds like imprudent policy. Packaging an unstable version should
only be done by somebody committed to tracking
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in
Fedora 17'
Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently.
That sounds like imprudent policy. Packaging an unstable version shou
Martin Tarenskeen writes:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
> 'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in
> Fedora 17'
Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently.
>>
>>> That sounds
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:04:19 +0200 (CEST)
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > This is the only workaround that comes to my mind, but probably it's
> > not what you are looking for:
> >
> > \tempo \markup {
> > \center-column {
> > \line { a very long }
> > \line { tempo string }
> > }
> > }
Thank you, David. Is it possible not to print other numbers other than the
multiple of five's?
Blessing in+,
Ming.
>
> From: David Nalesnik
>To: MING TSANG
>Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
>Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 6:53:38 PM
>Subject: Re: lilypond-user
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:38:48 +0200 (CEST)
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >> Attached is its output. How can I avoid that the \tempo string
> >> sticks out to the right?
> >
> > I think this is
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1133
>
> Mhmm, not really, I think. As can be s
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:26:29 +0200
David Kastrup wrote:
> Well, we've expected the next stable for months now. If the
> expectation does not turn out true, it might make sense to get a
> _timely_ report about just was the problem with 2.14. I am not
> particularly fond of the message that putti
Hey LilyPond users,
On the LilyPond website's upper righthand corner, we'll be starting in a few
days a "Pondings" column. This column will house a rotating cast of
tweet-sized messages about LilyPond-related projects. Anyone can submit a
Ponding, and I encourage you to do so!
Three ground r
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:07:42 +0200
> From: Jonas Olson
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Notation of french horn
> Message-ID: <1335514062.13951.43.camel@appendix>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Even though I do understand the nature of the valveless
Jonas Olson wrote on 04/27/2012 02:06:07 PM:
> From: Jonas Olson
> To: Tim Reeves
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Date: 04/27/2012 02:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Notation of french horn
>
> Interesting to see the variations that occur.
>
> fre 2012-04-27 klockan 11:50 -0700 skrev Tim Reeves:
> > Mozar
Hi Ming,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:23 AM, MING TSANG wrote:
> Thank you, David. Is it possible not to print other numbers other than
> the multiple of five's?
>
To to this, you only need to change one line of Harm's function (see below):
>
> \relative c'' {
>
>\override Score.BarN
Err..
;; if you change 5 to 3 in the line below, you'll get a bar line
> every three bars; if you change it to 10, every ten
> ;; bars; etc.
>
>
That's "bar number" of course!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
htt
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50, Tim Reeves wrote:
> Holst First Suite for Military Band (in E flat) (1909) - written for four
> horns in E flat - those were common in early twentieth century bands - horn
> parts have no sharps or flats in key signature - nowadays the player would
> get a part that
> Vaughn Williams's Sea Symphony (finished in 1909) gives the horns no key
> signature.
In his second symphony (finished in 1914), he gives no key signature
to the horns or trumpets (both in F), but does give a key signature to
the cornets.
___
lilypon
On 30/04/12 16:47, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Nick Payne"
To:
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:39 AM
Subject: tuplet number placement and ornament
In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though
Hi, David, I asked the wrong question. The right one: Can I just print the
multiple of fifth's (or 10's) only - the in between nar number should be blank?
Blessing in+,
Ming.
>
> From: David Nalesnik
>To: MING TSANG
>Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
>Sent: Mo
Hi Ming,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:53 PM, MING TSANG wrote:
> Hi, David, I asked the wrong question. The right one: Can I just print
> the multiple of fifth's (or 10's) only - the in between nar number should
> be blank?
>
>
OK, I now see what you want. For that you can do something like this
Can I just print the multiple of fifth's (or 10's) only - the in between
nar number should be blank?
%%
\version "2.15.37"
%%% solution 1
\relative c'' {
\override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#f #t #t)
\override S
Thank you Gilles and David: One more thing - how to put a box or circle to the
bar number that are now multiple of 5's?
Blessing in+,
>
> From: Gilles
>To: David Nalesnik ; MING TSANG
>Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
>Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 3:21:21 PM
>
After I send out the email, I search LSR and found the solution. Thank you
very much for your help.
Blessing in+,
Ming.
>
> From: MING TSANG
>To: Gilles ; David Nalesnik
>
>Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
>Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 4:00:43 PM
>Subject: Re:
>>> In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
>>> stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil
>>> was there:
>
> [...] I want the number there, but not have it displaced upwards as
> if the bracket was still there and avoiding the mordent. I found
> su
On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil
was there:
[...] I want the number there, but not have it displaced upwards as
if the bracket was still there and avoiding th
30 matches
Mail list logo
