I finally tracked it down:
I have
\paper {
#(define fonts (make-pango-font-tree "TeX Gyre Schola" "LMSans10"
"LMTypewriter10 Regular" (/ 14 20)))
}
but later
\layout {
#(layout-set-staff-size 14)
}
and that seems to reset the font tree!
If I move the font definition after the sta
Greetings All,
I am trying to tweak durations of pitches within a chord in triple
meter. If I understand correctly, `\tweak #'duration-log #1' in 3/4
meter would yield a duration of a dotted half note, and `\tweak
#'duration-log #3' would yield a quarter note? How does one accomplish
a ha
Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
>
> Greetings All,
> I am trying to tweak durations of pitches within a chord in triple
> meter. If I understand correctly, `\tweak #'duration-log #1' in 3/4
> meter would yield a duration of a dotted half note, and `\tweak
> #'duration-log #3' would yield a quarter n
Hey all,
I recently came across an announcement for an incredible composition
competition for SIX ORGANS (1one).
http://mmp.cm-cascais.pt/NR/rdonlyres/5BBEE22D-3C21-4996-AEFE-A2C0B2FAF9C9/12487/regulMCIngles2.pdf
The rules state that one can only use Sibelius or Finale. Thinking that this
Hi lilyponders!
In this example the glissando line collide with alteration sharp/flat and
\finger (left).
What can I do for resolving this problem?
Thank's.
\version "2.15.8"
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "a4")
}
global = {
\key c \major
\time 4/4
}
violin = \relative c'' {
\global
\overr
Am 18.08.2011 12:10, schrieb Mario Moles:
Hi lilyponders!
In this example the glissando line collide with alteration sharp/flat
and \finger (left).
What can I do for resolving this problem?
This problem is reported since September 20, 2006:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id
In data giovedì 18 agosto 2011 12:20:30, hai scritto:
Ok! Good!
Thank you so match!
>
> This problem is reported since September 20, 2006:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=40
>
> I think there is a patch correcting this, but it isn't applied yet.
> Either you wait for this
Although not being interested in this competition (as I'm not a
composer), I read through the contest rules.
I totally agree with you that it doesn't _seem_ to make sense to
restrict the composition to the two commercial software packages.
a)
For the whole process of the contest they only need
On 08/18/2011 12:01 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> The rules state that one can only use Sibelius or Finale. Thinking that
> this was perhaps an oversight, I contacted the administrator to see if I
> could use Lilypond, who replied:
Hmmm. It can be dangerous asking about random software they
Am 18.08.2011 13:34, schrieb Joseph Wakeling:
On 08/18/2011 12:01 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The rules state that one can only use Sibelius or Finale. Thinking that
this was perhaps an oversight, I contacted the administrator to see if I
could use Lilypond, who replied:
Hmmm. It can be
On 11-08-18 04:01 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
In the meantime, if anyone has six organs at their disposition, please
let me know and I will write a piece for you.
Cheers,
MS
Well, I've got a couple of tonsils and an appendix I could spare!
Cheers,
Colin
--
The human race has one rea
Am 18.08.2011 14:33, schrieb Colin Campbell:
On 11-08-18 04:01 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
In the meantime, if anyone has six organs at their disposition,
please let me know and I will write a piece for you.
Cheers,
MS
Well, I've got a couple of tonsils and an appendix I could spare!
Hello all,
Here's an idea: Since they're not asking for submission of the original
Sibelius/Finale file (only the PDF "paper" score), can we make Lilypond look
like Finale? Maybe by writing a Scheme engraver to randomly make horrible
anti-Lilypond engraving choices, with a parameter setting for
It may be that the will want the FinSib file of the winning piece and
only have editing capabilities with one of those two formats.
Still, it's sad.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here's an idea: Since they're not asking for submission of the original
Hi Urs,
> This might be another push for thinking about a MusicXML backend.
Yes.
> Althought this may seem opposite of lobbying LilyPond
No, to me this *is* part of "lobbying Lilypond": If we had a seamless MusicXML
import/export process, users could
(a) Choose to input in Finale/Sibelius (due
Am 2011-08-18 um 14:37 schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 18.08.2011 14:33, schrieb Colin Campbell:
On 11-08-18 04:01 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
In the meantime, if anyone has six organs at their disposition,
please let me know and I will write a piece for you.
Well, I've got a couple of tonsils
On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Neil Thornock wrote:
> It may be that the will want the FinSib file of the winning piece and
> only have editing capabilities with one of those two formats.
>
> Still, it's sad.
>
I didn't think of this...you're right that it's possible, but given the
numerous hac
harm6 wrote:
at least some of the suggestions should work!!
Make sure the lines to hide are really empty. Or, if you're using some other
context/voice (Lyrics , Dynamics etc.), try to comment these to locate the
problem. Some time ago I had a similiar one: a wrong rhythm in \new Dynamics
disturb
No, this is all very clear, If they want the source-file in sib or
mus, its only because:
- They are totally stupid and never heard of pdf printers (like pdf24,
it free and works fine)
- or they want to make a commercial use after modifying the files, who knows.
Now, count your time and think abou
On 08/18/2011 01:14 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> So far it also seems nonsensical to exclude handwritten scores. This
> isn't only unusual but also musically restricting.
> While really loving computer notation (at least with LilyPond), I often
> had the impression that some composer had let his creativi
On 08/18/2011 03:21 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> My original question still stands, though. I think that it is worth it for a
> community of users of any free software (where I mean free in every sense of
> the term) to be active in contacting organizations whose rules are hostile to
> the free us
> (I would be amused to know if they'd actually realize if someone did
> send print/PDF generated by Lilypond...)
I asked them that question, right after reading the mail that started
this thread. not that I seriously plan to participate, but the obvious
contradiction in "hand in your compositio
Hi to all!
In this example the chord with \arpeggio and finger: collision among arpeggio
and rest.
But without finger no collision?
Any idea?
Thanks
\version "2.15.8"
global = {
\key a \major
\time 2/4
}
cGO = \relative c {
\global
8 b\rest \arpeggioArrowUp \arpeggio b\rest|\bar "|."
}
c
Hi all,
by accident I noticed that when you try to upgrade a file (to version 2.14.2)
that is already up to date (2.14.0) with
convert-ly myfile.ly > mynewfile.ly
a new but empty file is created. There aren't any error messages. When you fake
an older version number everything works out and a
On Aug 18, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote:
> (I would be amused to know if they'd actually realize if someone did
>> send print/PDF generated by Lilypond...)
>
> I asked them that question, right after reading the mail that started
> this thread. not that I seriously plan to participate,
Hello,
I recently had an informal discussion with some collegues on the use of
SVG, in general.
They are in music research, I am a developer working on a completely
unrelated topic -
so please forgive me my ignorance w.r.t. music-related terminology.
We discussed the possibilities to use mus
oiram73 wrote:
>
> Hi to all!
> In this example the chord with \arpeggio and finger: collision among
> arpeggio
> and rest.
> But without finger no collision?
> Any idea?
> Thanks
> \version "2.15.8"
>
Hi,
try: \override Score.Arpeggio #'X-offset = #'-1.5
But perhaps there's a better solutio
Well, you can send it (on paper anyway then who cares? So stupid guys
cannot expertise a score as done with one or other soft) on paper, say
this is finale (more tweakable as sib) and bye.
Most musicians make a synonym engraving=sib or mus. Some think
organ=church or organ=vampire or whatever. Pers
Greetings Elouze,
Many thanks for pointing me in the right direction. It took a while
for me to understand it. But if I may ask further, how then does one
apply this to, say, realize dotted or tied durations?
Hwaen Ch'uqi
On 8/18/11, -Eluze wrote:
>
>
> Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
>>
>> Greeti
Yes!
Very good!
Thank's!
>
> Hi,
>
> try: \override Score.Arpeggio #'X-offset = #'-1.5
> But perhaps there's a better solution !
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
--
oiram/bin/selom
MkarlM-HomePage
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
ht
On Thu 18 Aug 2011, 08:32 Francois Planiol wrote:
> - They are totally stupid and
On Thu 18 Aug 2011, 09:49 Francois Planiol wrote:
> So stupid guys
:-)
ps. Not too constructive criticism, I'd say.
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk"Easy to use" is easy to say.
Bug Squad
Hi!
\arpeggioArrowUp don't work in the polyphony!
\version "2.15.7"
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
\new Staff
\with
{
\consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver"
}
\relative c''
{
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
<<
{\arpeggioArrowUp ces\arpeggio}
\\
{\arpeggioArrowUp es,\arpeggio }
oiram73 wrote:
>
> Hi lilyponders!
> In this example the glissando line collide with alteration sharp/flat and
> \finger (left).
> What can I do for resolving this problem?
> Thank's.
>
Hi,
another approach: \once\override Glissando #'(bound-details right padding) =
#2.5
Cheers,
Harm
--
Ooh! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes!
This is vary vary beautifl!
Thank you so math!
>
> Hi,
>
> another approach: \once\override Glissando #'(bound-details right padding)
> = #2.5
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
--
oiram/bin/selom
MkarlM-HomePage
___
lilypond-user
I even feel I have to come to those guys' defence - zero of my
professional as well as non-professional musical friends knew (of)
LilyPond before I told them, and I don't think many of them will use it
because they prefer the apparent comfort of
point-and-click-WYSIWYG-kind-of-programs. Whereas all
oiram73 wrote:
>
> Hi!
> \arpeggioArrowUp don't work in the polyphony!
> \version "2.15.7"
> \paper { ragged-right = ##t }
> \new Staff
> \with
> {
> \consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver"
> }
> \relative c''
> {
> \set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
> <<
> {\arpeggioArrowUp ces\arpeggi
> Your code compiles fine, giving a nice output with 2.14.2 ! ???
>
> Harm
You are sure? Your pdf output print the arrow?
In the mine no!
--
oiram/bin/selom
MkarlM-HomePage
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/ma
Dear Dmytro,
I was 20 y in Germany, a highly developped land. Now in Colombia, a
want-to-emerge third-world-land. I see everywhere the same pattern
(France too):
- Buy, if this costs a lot this will be better,
- think this is just easy, plug-n-play
- install, be disappointed, you need to learn qui
Am 18.08.2011 17:42, schrieb Robert Schmaus:
I even feel I have to come to those guys' defence - zero of my
professional as well as non-professional musical friends knew (of)
LilyPond before I told them, and I don't think many of them will use it
because they prefer the apparent comfort of
point-
Dear rob,
I worked with finale and this app needs a good eye to make a good job
with it. You can do really bad engraving with it, there are examples
on the web (xcuse, I dont have that under the hand, I dont cultivate
this part of my memory).
So finale or sib are definitely not a warranty of a go
On 08/18/2011 04:12 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
> Send them a one page sample of Lilypond output and as why that would not be
> acceptable.
I suspect you'd get a simple answer -- "Because it's not in accordance
with the rules."
Or alternatively, "We do not give feedback on extracts, if you wish to
e
After more docs-sniffing & experiments, I think my recent query
to Harm probably boils down to --
Given a (global) "short-indent" setting under \paper, is it possible
to "\once \override..." this value for individual score systems?
Regards,
Pete
___
1) Does anyone have a .ly file to share of _The Internationale_ in 4 parts?
(acappella, voices only)
2) In particular, 4 independent parts.
(the alto should not be "subject" to the soprano)
(the bass should not be "serving" the tenor)
(maybe that's hoping for too much)
3) or, sheet music of
On 19/08/11 01:57, Mario Moles wrote:
> Your code compiles fine, giving a nice output with 2.14.2 ! ???
>
> Harm
You are sure? Your pdf output print the arrow?
In the mine no!
No arrow on the arpeggio with 2.15.8 either, but you can use the following:
\version "2.15.7"
\paper { ragged-r
Oohhh!
Yes! Yes! Yes!
Thank you!
> No arrow on the arpeggio with 2.15.8 either, but you can use the following:
>
> \version "2.15.7"
>
> \paper { ragged-right = ##t }
>
> \new Staff
> \with
> {
> \consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver"
> }
>
> \relative c''
> {
> \set Staff.connectArpeggios = #
On 18/08/11 23:54, Mario Moles wrote:
Hi to all!
In this example the chord with \arpeggio and finger: collision among
arpeggio and rest.
But without finger no collision?
Any idea?
Has always been a problem ever since I started using Lilypond. I keep a
music function to use with arpeggios
Hello,
I'm trying to change a footnote example (overrides and more overrides)
to have both the "link" and the footnote without numbers, but with
arbitrary markups... (I would like to use "*" or "**" for example)...
Is it possible?
(with the code below I get automatic numbers and no asterisk
hello Hwaen Ch'uqi
Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
>
>
> Greetings Elouze,
> Many thanks for pointing me in the right direction. It took a while
> for me to understand it. But if I may ask further, how then does one
> apply this to, say, realize dotted or tied durations?
>
i don't think tere is a
OK! Good solution!
Thank you!
>
> Has always been a problem ever since I started using Lilypond. I keep a
> music function to use with arpeggios and fingering:
>
> \version "2.15.8"
>
> arpfinger = #(define-music-function (parser location pad) (number?) #{
> \once \override Staff.Arpeggio #
Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2011, 22:52:39 schrieb padovani:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to change a footnote example (overrides and more overrides)
> to have both the "link" and the footnote without numbers, but with
> arbitrary markups... (I would like to use "*" or "**" for example)...
>
> Is it pos
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:26 -0400, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> So, your only recourse is to actually query the restriction itself --
Hi All,
I must jump in here. I never send scores to contests anymore. Here in
the USA competitions are normally rigged from the start, especially if
th
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:01:32PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> My question is: what can we do, as a community, to overcome this
> type of hurdle?
There is a lot we could do to "spread the word".
- send release announcements to more places. I've only ever
announced things to lilypond-i
PMA-2 wrote:
>
> After more docs-sniffing & experiments, I think my recent query
> to Harm probably boils down to --
>
> Given a (global) "short-indent" setting under \paper, is it possible
> to "\once \override..." this value for individual score systems?
>
> Regards,
> Pete
>
Hi Pete,
I'm
How do I get small caps for lyrics? Here's how I've attempted to
select small caps: "\override LyricText #'font-shape = #'caps". I've
tried a few different fonts without success: "Helvetica", "Georgia",
"Verdana".
Have I just not found a font which supports small caps? Perhaps a more
basic questio
Craig writes:
> On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:26 -0400, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>> So, your only recourse is to actually query the restriction itself --
>
> Hi All,
>
> I must jump in here. I never send scores to contests anymore. Here in
> the USA competitions are normally rigged from
On Thu 18 Aug 2011, 17:42 Robert Schmaus wrote:
> I even feel I have to come to those guys' defence - zero of my
> professional as well as non-professional musical friends knew (of)
> LilyPond before I told them, and I don't think many of them will use it
Yes, many of people around me are *very* pr
On 19/08/11 11:17, Jay Anderson wrote:
How do I get small caps for lyrics? Here's how I've attempted to
select small caps: "\override LyricText #'font-shape = #'caps". I've
tried a few different fonts without success: "Helvetica", "Georgia",
"Verdana".
Have I just not found a font which supports
Am 2011-08-18 um 22:22 schrieb dadadharma @dslextreme.com:
1) Does anyone have a .ly file to share of _The Internationale_ in 4
parts?
(acappella, voices only)
2) In particular, 4 independent parts.
(the alto should not be "subject" to the soprano)
(the bass should not be "serving" the te
58 matches
Mail list logo
