Well, you can send it (on paper anyway then who cares? So stupid guys cannot expertise a score as done with one or other soft) on paper, say this is finale (more tweakable as sib) and bye. Most musicians make a synonym engraving=sib or mus. Some think organ=church or organ=vampire or whatever. Personally, I have better to do than "teaching" people who dont want to learn. and they dont want.
Francois 2011/8/18, Tim McNamara <tim...@bitstream.net>: > > On Aug 18, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote: > >> (I would be amused to know if they'd actually realize if someone did >>> send print/PDF generated by Lilypond...) >> >> I asked them that question, right after reading the mail that started >> this thread. not that I seriously plan to participate, but the obvious >> contradiction in "hand in your compositions printed and as PDF" >> intrigued me to ask them if/how they determine that a submitted score is >> actually produced by Finale/Sibelius. No answer yet ... > > Send them a one page sample of Lilypond output and as why that would not be > acceptable. > > My guess is the answer is the "prize" of publication- the publisher will > likely want a Finale or Sibelius file. Along with the composer signing away > most of their rights and control over the piece. > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
