nachkan wrote:
I am simply trying to explicitly write out a glissando in small notes (of
a specified size), while keeping the rhythmic notation accurate. They
happen to be 64th notes, so they have four beams connecting the stems. It
is easy enough to make the noteheads the desired size with e.g.
Hello list,
I have written a document with a number of pieces within a single \book block.
Each piece is a separate \score. I'm now working on an even density of the
systems, so the document looks nice as a whole. I have one problem here:
For some pieces I have set a fixed system-count to overr
Which version of LilyPond are you using?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Steinmetzger"
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 3:47 PM
Subject: Weirdness in distribution of systems across pages
Hello list,
I have written a document with a number of pieces within a
On Saturday 04 December 2010 16:59:59 Phil Holmes wrote:
> Which version of LilyPond are you using?
Thought about that fact a couple of seconds after sending. *g*
It’s 2.12.3.
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
Moderener Tourismus: Man glaubt zu reisen und wird doch nur transportiert.
OK - got a bit further!
Changing the path variable didn't do it. Reviewing old emails again, I see
that the PATH variable can be set in the shell OR in the Lyx -> Preferences ->
Paths -> PATH Prefix
THEN, you need to do:
Lyx -> Reconfigure
(This was a step I was missing for a while.)
Frank Steinmetzger gmx.de> writes:
> [...] It's almost perfect,
> except for piece 9, which is only three systems big with (relatively) much
> space in between. So I tried if it could be 4 systems long and it can.
>
> However, for some reason, when I do so it messes up piece 2. Although it is
On 04/12/10 23:38, Richie Gress wrote:
nachkan wrote:
I am simply trying to explicitly write out a glissando in small
notes (of
a specified size), while keeping the rhythmic notation accurate. They
happen to be 64th notes, so they have four beams connecting the
stems. It
is easy enough to make
I don't understand alternatives. Can someone explain to me what I'm doing
wrong. Why does the first example not compile properly with the excuse, "more
alternatives than repeats" but the second example compiles just fine?
\version "2.12.3"
\book {
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
\repeat volta 2
On 4 December 2010 22:05, James Bailey wrote:
> I don't understand alternatives. Can someone explain to me what I'm doing
> wrong. Why does the first example not compile properly with the excuse, "more
> alternatives than repeats" but the second example compiles just fine?
In your first example
On Dec 4, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 4 December 2010 22:05, James Bailey wrote:
>> I don't understand alternatives. Can someone explain to me what I'm doing
>> wrong. Why does the first example not compile properly with the excuse,
>> "more alternatives than repeats" but the s
On Saturday 04 December 2010 19:14:46 Keith OHara wrote:
> > [...] It's almost perfect,
> > except for piece 9, which is only three systems big with (relatively)
> > much space in between. So I tried if it could be 4 systems long and it
> > can.
> >
> > However, for some reason, when I do so it m
Am 04.12.2010 um 23:05 schrieb James Bailey:
I don't understand alternatives. Can someone explain to me what I'm
doing wrong. Why does the first example not compile properly with
the excuse, "more alternatives than repeats" but the second example
compiles just fine?
Hi James,
in your firs
Neil Puttock wrote:
> In your first example, LilyPond sees three blocks of music
> inside \alternative since there's an isolated barcheck
> between the two music parts.
This is a very easy mistake to make (and an annoying one to
have to figure out on your own). Can someone mention this
in the doc
Having trouble with new autobeam settings. I get the simplest thing to work:
\relative c' {
\time 4/4
\set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
\set Timing.beatStructure = #'(3 3 2)
c8 c c c c c c c
}
Shouldn't this group the 8th notes into 3 + 3 + 2? I can't get the
beaming to chang
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Having trouble with new autobeam settings. I get the simplest thing to work:
>
> \relative c' {
> \time 4/4
> \set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
> \set Timing.beatStructure = #'(3 3 2)
> c8 c c c c c c c
> }
>
> Shouldn't this
On 5 December 2010 02:13, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>
> Ok so now I've been able to make the beaming change if I am in 8/8 or
> 6/8 but not in 4/4 time, where it stays resolutely in groups of 4 + 4
> 8th notes. How do I alter the beaming of a 4/4 bar?
Hi,
I suppose it is due to beamExceptions that
On 12/4/10 6:21 PM, "Xavier Scheuer" wrote:
> On 5 December 2010 02:13, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>>
>> Ok so now I've been able to make the beaming change if I am in 8/8 or
>> 6/8 but not in 4/4 time, where it stays resolutely in groups of 4 + 4
>> 8th notes. How do I alter the beaming of a 4/4
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suppose it is due to beamExceptions that is set for 8th in 4/4
>> (see Oscm/time-signature-settings.scm¹).
>>
>
> Yep, I had just made and tested the change when this email came in.
>
>> This works:
>>
>> \relative c' {
>> \t
On 5 December 2010 02:26, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> I can't see how it should be changed. It's totally under user control.
> There are three separate context properties that affect autobeaming, and all
> three need to be properly set.
Yeah, but from a simple user perspective it is not obvious tha
On 12/4/10 6:33 PM, "Xavier Scheuer" wrote:
> On 5 December 2010 02:26, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> I can't see how it should be changed. It's totally under user control.
>> There are three separate context properties that affect autobeaming, and all
>> three need to be properly set.
>
> Ye
On 12/4/10 6:33 PM, "Xavier Scheuer" wrote:
> On 5 December 2010 02:26, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>> I can see that it needs to be documented better. I'll cook a patch.
>
> Great, thanks!
I've pushed a patch that does the following:
1) Identifies that beamExceptions can cause unexpected result
thanks all for your help. Browsing the lilypond doc I have stumbled upon the
section on the Gregorian notation and what do i find? a half-bar!
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Typesetting-Gregorian-chant.html#Divisiones
I tried to use it but apparently it is a breath mar
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 12/4/10 6:33 PM, "Xavier Scheuer" wrote:
>
>> On 5 December 2010 02:26, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>> I can see that it needs to be documented better. I'll cook a patch.
>>
>> Great, thanks!
>
> I've pushed a patch that does the following:
Further research shows that gs is not finding a dynamic library. Console
reports:
dyld: Library not loaded: ./bin/../sobin/libgs.8.70.dylib
I tried to soft link from lib (which contains the dyld) to sobin, but that
still didn't work. gs also failed from command line.
However, if I di
just want to let you know there was a typo in the snippet that i just caught.
The function works great and the thinner half bar looks more like the one
Bach's wrote.
What about adding this snippet in the doc about bar lines?
Would it be possible to do the BarLine override every other bar automat
25 matches
Mail list logo
