How do I automatically prevent the printing of bar numbers
which coincide with rehearsal marks? Especially when using
format-mark-barnumbers or format-mark-box-barnumbersor
format-mark-circle-barnumbers, it is odd to see the bar
number printed twice.
Thanks,
Mark
Hi there!
I'm surprised to have the text of my lead sheet starting on the second
note. Did I miss something obvious? :)
Thanks for your help.
Jean-Alexis
Here's the code ran through 2.11.63 version:
minForJan.ly
Description: Binary data
___
l
Am 11.12.2008 um 10:47 schrieb Jean-Alexis Montignies:
Hi there!
I'm surprised to have the text of my lead sheet starting on the
second note. Did I miss something obvious? :)
Thanks for your help.
Jean-Alexis
Here's the code ran through 2.11.63 version:
I don't know why, but ammending
Am 11.12.2008 um 10:47 schrieb Jean-Alexis Montignies:
Hi there!
I'm surprised to have the text of my lead sheet starting on the
second note. Did I miss something obvious? :)
Thanks for your help.
Jean-Alexis
Here's the code ran through 2.11.63 version:
Also, changing the curly braces
Mark Polesky wrote:
How do I automatically prevent the printing of bar numbers
which coincide with rehearsal marks?
I cannot think of any simple way to obtain that. But,...
Especially when using
format-mark-barnumbers or format-mark-box-barnumbersor
format-mark-circle-barnumbers, it is odd
Any suggestions about where to find a Lilypond developer for contract work?___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Dag Grammostola Rosea,
op woensdag 10 december 2008, schreef je:
> Thanks. I have installed lilypond-kde4
>
> But it doesn't work. When I click a note in Okular, it doesn't switch in
> kate...
You should configure Kate as the preferred editor for the LilyPond mimetype.
(rightclick a .ly file, se
Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
Dag Grammostola Rosea,
op woensdag 10 december 2008, schreef je:
Thanks. I have installed lilypond-kde4
But it doesn't work. When I click a note in Okular, it doesn't switch in
kate...
You should configure Kate as the preferred editor for the LilyPond mimetyp
[Fwd-ing to the mailing list]
2008/12/11 Didi & MiMi Kanjahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Valentin,
Greetings,
> I am still a bit frustrated with the automatic spacing of Lilypond.
> I wish I could have a bit more control over it. Most of these problems would
> be fine when creating just a sheet f
2008/12/11 Grammostola Rosea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, I thought one function of lilypond-kde4 was clicking a note in Okular
> makes the cursor switch to that note in kate... but that doesn't work here.
I think this is available for KDE3 but not yet for KDE4.
Cheers,
Valentin
2008/12/11 Stefan Waler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I attach a sample script, please note the accidentials for 'ces' in the
> second and for 'fes' in the forth bar. I tried to simplify the score very
> much, but it seems as lilypond continues to calculate wrong spaces for every
> further accidental of
Hello, I'd like to have two simultaneous marks, "fine" under the
staff and a rehearsal letter above the staff. I've found http://
lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-04/msg00492.html
which suggests I split all of the music after the fine into a coda
section with a \stopStaff \startS
It seems that the accidentals that are not printed in the new measure
because of the tie,
are not removed completely, but just made invisible still taking space.
/Mats
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/12/11 Stefan Waler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I attach a sample script, please note the accid
Hi all,
My question is how to beneficiate of percent in an "repeat volta"
alternative ?
See attached pdf / script.
- First line is what i don't want : having to repeat first measure in
the first alternative
- 2nd is what i want with using the trick of a rest + percent sign stencil
Question #
Thanks for the analysis!
Do you think there is any workaround?
Any chance to get this fixed in 2.11?
Stefan
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
It seems that the accidentals that are not printed in the new measure
because of the tie,
are not removed completely, but just made invisible still taking space.
Well, one trick is to draw both marks as a single markup command with a
sufficiently large
vertical separation, and then move it downwards so that the upper mark
appears above the
staff and the lower one below. Example:
\version "2.10.0"
\relative c'{ c d e f
\once \override Score.RehearsalMar
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> In such a situation, I don't see the point of printing
> any bar numbers the "normal" way, so you could just
> remove the standard bar numbers completely, see the manual.
The reason for printing the bar numbers makes sense if the
rehearsal numbers come every 30 bars or so
2008/12/11 Stefan Waler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Do you think there is any workaround?
There's a workaround mentioned here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=612
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http:/
Mark Polesky wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
In such a situation, I don't see the point of printing
any bar numbers the "normal" way, so you could just
remove the standard bar numbers completely, see the manual.
The reason for printing the bar numbers makes sense if the
rehearsal numbe
Hi,
2008/12/11 Luci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Question #1 is :
> - how to simply have the percent without cheating ?
I don't think it's possible.
> - if not possible, how to customize the stencil to have the basic
> percent look ?
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=499
> Question #2 is :
> - on
2008/12/11 Neil Puttock :
> There's a workaround mentioned here:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=612
Oh, I thought this one looked familiar but i couldn't find it. Thanks Neil!
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lily
Wow that was simple, thanks for your answers.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 11/28/08 4:47 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote:
There's major problem with your proposed \hideAll (or whatever you want
to call it), namely
that the hidden voice will influence the placement of the other voices,
since LilyPond will
try to avoid collisions with the hidden
Jonathan, if you read the follow-up email I sent to Carl's answer, you
will realize that this solution still has problems, that unfortunately
can be at least as severe as those you get from the DevNull solution.
/Mats
Quoting Jonathan Kulp :
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 11/28/08 4:47 AM,
Thanks, I'm pretty good with markup, but not good enough to come up
with this on my own. Now, to the more important issue, is there
somewhere listed what the font settings for the rehearsal marks are?
I'd like this one to look like all the others.
Am 11.12.2008 um 17:36 schrieb Mats Bengtss
Op donderdag 11 december 2008, schreef Grammostola Rosea:
> Ok, I thought one function of lilypond-kde4 was clicking a note in
> Okular makes the cursor switch to that note in kate... but that doesn't
> work here.
Strange. Try running okular 'file.pdf' from the console and look at the
messages wh
Given this situation, it seems to me that the best thing to do is to just
put both examples (DevNull and hidden voice) in the LSR, and have them show
up in selected snippets.
None of the solutions is so good that I think they should be included in the
main portion of the manual.
Carl
On 12/11/0
If I may...
BTW I'm not sure whether this topic belongs in fretted strings or in
chords or what. Any thoughts?
From an editorial point of view, I think this should find a home in a
sub-section titled "Song Sheets" or something similar under "Vocal
Music." I don't believe it belongs under "F
Hi and thanks to everyone who has helped me so far.
I'd like to display a few notes as crosses in the TabStaff context. For REGULAR
staffs, the following indeed works:
\new Staff {
\override NoteHead #'style = #'cross
c c c c
% To switch back:
\override NoteHead #'
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
Given this situation, it seems to me that the best thing to do is to just
put both examples (DevNull and hidden voice) in the LSR, and have them show
up in selected snippets.
None of the solutions is so good that I think they should be included in the
main portion of the
I was transcribing something, and I found myself typing the following:
cis16-. \p e,-. fis-. gis-. a-. b-. cis-. d-. e-. cis-. d-. b-.
Now, isn't there an easier way to do this than manually to apply the
staccato to every note?
RW
--
Richard Wattenbarger
Best e-mail address: rich...@wa
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:10:01PM -0500, Richard Wattenbarger wrote:
> I was transcribing something, and I found myself typing the following:
>
>cis16-. \p e,-. fis-. gis-. a-. b-. cis-. d-. e-. cis-. d-. b-.
>
> Now, isn't there an easier way to do this than manually to apply t
Hi
I have a table of contents which contains the following...
1. Joy to the
Universe1
56. Woe Beyond
Hope3
112.
Frankly
9
2001. Same Old Same Old
26
This is made up of successive \bookpart \tocIte
I am using the \portato and \tenuto to add articulations to my music. In both
cases the horizontal line does not appear in the PDF. In the case of the
portato, the dot does appear so it looks like a staccato. my \staccato and
\accent and others that I have tried work fine.
--
View this message in
abqconlon wrote:
I am using the \portato and \tenuto to add articulations to my music. In both
cases the horizontal line does not appear in the PDF. In the case of the
portato, the dot does appear so it looks like a staccato. my \staccato and
\accent and others that I have tried work fine.
One
35 matches
Mail list logo
