[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Indeed, and it suggests that the documentation should make this point
> > more clearly. I made the same mistake when I started out.
>
> It really wouldn't be that difficult to make a setting to
it depends. It would be quite hairy to get transposition right, for
exam
I would like to change chord fonts to sans-serif.
Setting:
\property ChordNames . ChordName \set #'font-name =#"cmss12"
almost works, but in this case accidentals don't appear next to chord names.
Is there a way to set chord fonts to sans serif?
Thanks,
Márton
Hi folks,
after a long time, I'm coming up with a question again:
I have a short coda (2 bars). Before the coda, obviously I have to create a
linebreak. Now the line containing the coda is unnaturally stretched, as it
gets aligned flush left and right.
Is there a way to align this line (and on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I would like to change chord fonts to sans-serif.
>
> Setting:
>
> \property ChordNames . ChordName \set #'font-name =#"cmss12"
>
> almost works, but in this case accidentals don't appear next to chord names.
>
> Is there a way to set chord fonts to sans serif?
You
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
It really wouldn't be that difficult to make a setting to
make-key-signature-chromatics true which would do what it
says and leave notes which have accidentals alone.
Yes it would.
This way the music definitions would be context dependent, meaning that
the same piece o
Pedro Kroger writes:
> Debian Sid packages of Lilypond 1.9.5 are available from my website:
>
> http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/
It's great that you're providing packages. Have you considered making
these apt-gettable (ie, run dpkg-scanpackages), or even better:
contributing to the Debian p
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Pedro Kroger writes:
> > Debian Sid packages of Lilypond 1.9.5 are available from my website:
> > http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/
> It's great that you're providing packages. Have you considered making
> these apt-gettable (ie, run dpkg-scan
Pedro Kroger writes:
> Yes, I have. They're now apt-gettable adding the following line to
> sources.list:
>
> deb http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/ ./
Nice!
> I don't see why not.
Because it will cost you some time and you should be willing to keep
it up for a while; you'll probably need to
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I don't see why not.
> Because it will cost you some time and you should be willing to keep
> it up for a while;
well, that's how development of free software works :-)
> you'll probably need to be(come) a debian maintainer and do (or help
> A
Pedro Kroger writes:
> well, that's how development of free software works :-)
> the "new" package idea is very good. I was thinking of 1.9.x replacing
> 1.8 which now doesn't sound good because 1.9 is a development series.
Ok.
> Having a "new" package will imply on installing the binaries in a
Pedro Kroger wrote:
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Pedro Kroger writes:
Debian Sid packages of Lilypond 1.9.5 are available from my website:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/
It's great that you're providing packages. Have you considered making
these apt-gettab
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have 1.8.1 installed from unstable. Adding your line to my
> sources.list with apt-get install lilypond lilypond-doc I get:
> lilypond is already the newest version.
> lilypond-doc is already the newest version.
Have you run apt-get update ?
Pedro
Pedro Kroger wrote:
Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have 1.8.1 installed from unstable. Adding your line to my
sources.list with apt-get install lilypond lilypond-doc I get:
lilypond is already the newest version.
lilypond-doc is already the newest version.
Have you run apt-
> >>I have 1.8.1 installed from unstable. Adding your line to my
> >>sources.list with apt-get install lilypond lilypond-doc I get:
> >>lilypond is already the newest version.
> >>lilypond-doc is already the newest version.
> >Have you run apt-get update ?
> Yes
how about apt-get install lilyp
Pedro Kroger wrote:
how about apt-get install lilypond=1.9.5-1 ?
That's working.
Thanks,
Paul
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Sorry to get off topic so soon after starting to hang around here, but
I have a question that Lilypond types are likely to know the answer to.
The problem is that tempo instructions in MIDI files are ignored by all
the free sequencers I've been able to find for OS X, my working
platform. The s
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:14:46 -0400
Lucas Gonze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course there are a bazillion software sequencers, but none of them
> meet the need. They're either bloated GUI tools, non-OS X, or
> pre-alpha dreamware. All I need is a MIDI renderer that respects tempo
> instructi
Hi,
If I want to cross staves, I call this on the bass line (with nothing
more than skips on treble):
% measure 1
\times 2/3 { r8 c'-[-( f-] } \times 2/3 { aflat-[ f aflat-] } \times
2/3 { c-[ aflat c-] } \times 2/3 { f-[ c f-] }
% measure 2
\translator Staff = "up"
\times 2/3 { aflat-[ f af
Here's more debug. It still doesn't make any sense. There is a missing }
- Mats Bengtsson's Original Message -
> As I said before, please, please keep the discussion on the mailing
> list, don't just reply to me in private.
Sure. If you'll do the same. It would be a lot easier to ke
I changed the lilypond-profile and now it seems to be getting further.
I changed This:
TEXMF="{$datadir,"`kpsexpand \\$TEXMF`"}"
To this:
TEXMF="{" "$datadir,"`kpsexpand \\$TEXMF`"}"
The extra { is now gone.
Now it can't find mf.base. It looks like it knows where it is,
but
Title: Re: RedHat7.3 and Windows[Scanned]
> "Jan" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I do not want to know how cygwin works; i have used it in the past
>> without any detailed knowledge.
Jan> Well, lilypond is not different from any other Cygwin package. Just
J
Title: Re: RedHat7.3 and Windows[Scanned]
> Jan> You can simply mirror the Cygwin distribution on your server. Run
> Jan> setup.exe on the windows client, and enter your server as download
> Jan> mirror. Consult the cygwin mailing list archives.
>
> All I wanted was Lilypond on my W
Title: Re: RedHat7.3 and Windows[Scanned]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>"Jan" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> >> I do not want to know how cygwin works; i have used it in the past
> >> without any detailed knowledge.
>
> Jan> Well, lilypond is not differ
Title: Re: RedHat7.3 and Windows[Scanned]
[followup set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> No I do not have access to a Windows machine connected to the net.
You can simply mirror the Cygwin distribution on your server. Run
setup.exe on the windows client, and enter your server as download
mirror
Title: Re: Cygwin dll oddness[Scanned]
"Chris Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to install the latest Cygwin binary (1.7.29-11) from one of the
> official Cygwin mirrors. After installing, running lilypond --help
> (or --anything) fails with a dialog error box with the fo
Title: Re: Cygwin dll oddness[Scanned]
"Simon Weatherill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just got that as well. You have to use the develpment (I assume)
> cygwin (1.5.1-1 instead of 1.3.22-1) - under Base.
Yes, but you *must not* select this package by hand. What you must
do, is chec
Title: Re: RedHat7.3 and Windows[Scanned]
> "Jan" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> [followup set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> No I do not have access to a Windows machine connected to the net.
Jan> You can simply mirror the Cygwin distribution on your server. Run
27 matches
Mail list logo
