At 13:02 12-9-03 -0700, you wrote:
You can certainly make a "15va" spanner. Do you want an actual
clef (which I've never seen before), or just a "two octaves higher" section
in your music?
Yes, I want to make an actual clef. I believe I saw it in a composition
somewhere (I think an etude by Crame
LEFKE AVRUPA ÜNİVERSİTESİ
(KIBRIS BİLİM VAKFI)
YÖK tarafından tanınan, Avrupa ve Amerika'da geçerli diplomaya en kaliteli
ve en uygun harçlarla sahip olma olanağı ...
ÖSS Sınavından 185 ve üzeri ham puan almış öğrenciler 4 yıllık lisans
programlarına, 160 ve üzer
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 09:32:47 +0200
Thorkil Wolvendans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh well. Maybe someone hiding out there knows a way to fake a \clef
> "treble^15", or am I stuck to a "15va"-spanner?
Now that I've given it some more thought...
there's two parts to this problem:
1) Printing a t
(in fact, if you only want a small number of physical copies of this,
you could solve #1 by writing "15va" by hand! :)
That's an idea...but it's in for a contest, so it has to look very neatly
(and there's no software neatlier than LilyPond! :D)
Hmm... well I'll have a thought about what I'm goi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The best way would involve some scheme or a new symbol in a font, but
> that's far beyond my knowledge.
Heikki recently posted a patch (to -devel, I think) to get a proper
"G^15" clef.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 20:11, Arvid Grøtting wrote:
> arie-lily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But it would be difficult for people who 'fix' things by inserting a
> > temporary voice on the staff.
>
> I'm not suggesting to make it default, I'm simply asking if there's
> some way I can do this
At 12:24 13-9-03 +0200, you wrote:
Heikki recently posted a patch (to -devel, I think) to get a proper
"G^15" clef.
Hmm... I use Lily with Cygwin... can you tell me if it's possible to use
that patch with cygwin, and if so, how to get and install that patch?
Regards,
Thorkil
_
Given the following score, the 2nd note should come out in the DVI as
an F sharp, but is instead an F natural. Any suggestions? Have mercy
-- I am still struggling through the "hello world" stage.
\score {
\notes {
\clef treble
\time 3/8
\key g
Lucas Gonze wrote:
Given the following score, the 2nd note should come out in the DVI as an
F sharp, but is instead an F natural. Any suggestions? Have mercy -- I
am still struggling through the "hello world" stage.
\score {
\notes {
\clef treble
\time
On Samedi, sep 13, 2003, at 12:22 America/New_York, Rune Zedeler wrote:
Lucas Gonze wrote:
Given the following score, the 2nd note should come out in the DVI as
an F sharp, but is instead an F natural. Any suggestions? Have
mercy -- I am still struggling through the "hello world" stage.
\score
You don't understand: in the file.ly the notes must be entered exactly as if there was no
\key entry. So if you want "f" sharp just type "fis". If it is "f" natural just "f".
Then lily combines \key and the pitches to decide if it is necessary to print the symbol
sharp before the f. So if you use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> As I'm coming to understand it, if you are in "\key F \major",
> "bes" will give you a no-accidental B
> "b" will give you a b with a natural accidental
>
> Yeah?
>
a "no-accidental B" does not exist, strictly speaking:
* Note heads on the staff have or ha
Rune Zedeler wrote:
We see this question very often on this list - and I REALLY don't
understand why... :-(
Apparently this is not related to the OP's question but I don't see why
you don't understand. It's because that's the way Finale and other
software works. If you've used other software
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:08:52 -0700
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rune Zedeler wrote:
>
> > We see this question very often on this list - and I REALLY don't
> > understand why... :-(
>
> Apparently this is not related to the OP's question but I don't see
> why you don't understand.
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:08:34 +1000
Nathan Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:08:52 -0700
> Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Apparently this is not related to the OP's question but I don't see
> > why you don't understand. It's because that's the way Finale and
> > o
On Saturday 13 September 2003 08:08 pm, Nathan Hurst wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:08:52 -0700
>
> Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rune Zedeler wrote:
> > > We see this question very often on this list - and I REALLY don't
> > > understand why... :-(
> >
> > Apparently this is not relat
16 matches
Mail list logo
