Import xml multiple stanzas

I have .xml files of hymns with multiple stanzas. However, Frescobaldi will import only the first stanza. How can I persuade it to import every stanza?

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

: Tried to follow the thread and<89v5MD16SNxJTYXF.png>- exported an arbitrary ly file using Frescobaldi experimental feature as Jean described -> *.xml - open *.xml file in MuseScore 3.0<2MHR5bs5tHo0qkAF.png>(Translation: File xyz is no valid MusicXML file. Sh

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

co. >> >> Thanks if you can send me this file. >> >> JM >> >>> Le 4 oct. 2022 à 22:16, Stephan Schöll mailto:mu...@gmx.ch>> >>> a écrit : >>> >>> Tried to follow the thread and >>> >>> <89v5MD16SNxJT

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

our .ly file to MusicXML using Fresco. > > Thanks if you can send me this file. > > JM > >> Le 4 oct. 2022 à 22:16, Stephan Schöll mailto:mu...@gmx.ch>> >> a écrit : >> >> Tried to follow the thread and >> >> <89v5MD16SNxJT

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

ed an arbitrary ly file using Frescobaldi experimental feature as > Jean described -> *.xml > > - open *.xml file in MuseScore 3.0 > > <2MHR5bs5tHo0qkAF.png> > > (Translation: File xyz is no valid MusicXML file. Should I try to open > anyway?) > > Error messag

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

v5MD16SNxJTYXF.png> > > - exported an arbitrary ly file using Frescobaldi experimental feature as > Jean described -> *.xml > > - open *.xml file in MuseScore 3.0 > > <2MHR5bs5tHo0qkAF.png> > > (Translation: File xyz is no valid MusicXML file. Should I try to op

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

Tried to follow the thread and - exported an arbitrary ly file using Frescobaldi experimental feature as Jean described -> *.xml - open *.xml file in MuseScore 3.0 (Translation: File xyz is no valid MusicXML file. Should I try to open anyway?) Error message: Fatal error: Line 11 Column

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

Le 04/10/2022 à 21:15, Ella Yu a écrit : Thanks Jean. So basically the resulting exported XML literally won't open in MuseScore because it says it's not a valid XML file, so I went and opened it in Finale Notepad and then re-exported it and the notes were all wrong. [...] Interest

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

Thanks Jean. So basically the resulting exported XML literally won't open in MuseScore because it says it's not a valid XML file, so I went and opened it in Finale Notepad and then re-exported it and the notes were all wrong. I'll have to look at how to export the MIDI fles as i

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

Le 04/10/2022 à 21:00, Ella Yu a écrit : Hi everyone, Thanks for telling me about the enable experimental features thing. I did finally see the export XML function but the results are terrible. Unfortunately I can't find the export MIDI option. Can someone please explain how to acce

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

Hi everyone, Thanks for telling me about the enable experimental features thing. I did finally see the export XML function but the results are terrible. Unfortunately I can't find the export MIDI option. Can someone please explain how to access it? Thanks. On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 11:50 AM

Re: Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

Le 04/10/2022 à 18:51, Ella Yu a écrit : Hi everyone, I know the subject of xml export has been discussed a lot, but I do need help. I found some LilyPond files online for a particular piece that I need to convert to xml so I can then turn it into braille music. I know nothing about LilyPond

Lilypond to XML Conversion Help

Hi everyone, I know the subject of xml export has been discussed a lot, but I do need help. I found some LilyPond files online for a particular piece that I need to convert to xml so I can then turn it into braille music. I know nothing about LilyPond code but am willing to give command line

Re: Export to XML

Le 30/08/2022 à 12:55, nitra...@posteo.net a écrit : A MusicXML export integrated into LilyPond has been discussed repeatedly, and everybody agrees that it is desirable, but it has not been implemented so far because, well, it's quite easier said than done.

Re: Export to XML

> A MusicXML export integrated into LilyPond has been discussed repeatedly, > and everybody agrees that it is desirable, but it has not been implemented > so far because, well, it's quite easier said than done. In a free (libre) > / open source project, the only way to be sure something will get do

Re: Export to XML

le to import or export in XML? I haven't have a use for that kind of feature until now, and I don't know how the commercial softwares handle that, but still, wouldn't that be a great argument to convince the people to go for it? Final thought, I don't know how Urs did manage t

Re: Export to XML

Dear all, Thank you for your comments about that situation. I tried what Jean suggested : 1) The XML export in Frescobaldi did work but the result was very unsatisfactory. I even tried to simplify as much as I could (erased all tweaks, custom commands, fingerings) and only kept the music notes

Re: Export to XML

Hello Andrew, > In your workflow, why the double export? if the result is fine from Lilypond > why then export from MuseScore? I’d say it is to refine the score with MuseScore to fix the imperfect Lily->MusicXML export. JM

Re: Export to XML

I thought the musicxml export is only experimental/preliminary. How developed is it exactly? The OP seems to have tuned and tweaked his engraving extensively for the best appearance (OP to confirm...). Is this tool capable of capturing all such fine tweaks? Or is this beyond MusicXML anyway?

Re: Export to XML

From: Andrew Bernard   Subject: Re: Export to XML  Unless they accept a PDF  from you and print that or reset from scratch I think you are stuck. My son is arranging the publication of the remaining works of a recently deceased composer, and the republication properly typeset of some works

Re: Export to XML

hin their music software (I am not sure of which one they> are using yet).>> I proposed to send them my LilyPond files but I have been confirmed yesterday> that they cannot process those... They told me an XML file might help them> though. I looked if it was possible to export in XML but I r

Re: Export to XML

t process those... They told me an XML file might help them though. I looked if it was possible to export in XML but I read the result was bad and LilyPond wasn't made for that task... So here's my question: what would you suggest I could do to export my scores and help them prepare t

Re: Export to XML

People have made styles and fonts for Finale and Sibelius that mimic quite closely Henle Verlag and Barenreiter. But it's a huge amount of work, and only because they like it, not for submission. Surely Schott is not expecting you to create a complete house style in an entirely different progr

Re: Export to XML

a...@posteo.net wrote: >> I proposed to send them my LilyPond files but I have been confirmed yesterday >> that they cannot process those... They told me an XML file might help them >> though. I looked if it was possible to export in XML but I read the result >> was >>

Re: Export to XML

nce on the list re your question is also confirmation that there is not an answer to this. I may be wrong! Andrew On 25/08/2022 10:43 pm, nitra...@posteo.net wrote: I proposed to send them my LilyPond files but I have been confirmed yesterday that they cannot process those... They told me a

Export to XML

you might guess, they want to engrave it with their own editorial chart and within their music software (I am not sure of which one they are using yet). I proposed to send them my LilyPond files but I have been confirmed yesterday that they cannot process those... They told me an XML file might help

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

ill correctly import the XML file (and add the correct encoding when re-exporting to XML). While I know this is not a correct export I think it would be a good start and in any case better than nothing. But I would like to know what the other programs will do with the code. So I'd be hap

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

Dorico imports these as intended Op 5-5-2018 om 08:25 schreef Urs Liska: ... So I'd be happy if people could import the attached .xml file to Finale, Sibelius and (if possible) Dorico, and tell me about the results. Also attached is the reference image of what it should look like.

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

Thanks Simon, I’ll have something quite interesting to read in the forthcoming time! JM > Le 7 mai 2018 à 20:08, Simon Albrecht a écrit : > > On 07.05.2018 18:51, Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote: >> Would it be a reasonable approach to have LilyPond first produce data in >> memory, i.e. Scheme data

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

On 07.05.2018 18:51, Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote: Would it be a reasonable approach to have LilyPond first produce data in memory, i.e. Scheme data representing the whole score, and then either to produce the score or a MIDI file or supply this data to other applications, such as a MusicXML expo

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

7. Mai 2018 18:51, "Jacques Menu Muzhic" schrieb: > Would it be a reasonable approach to have LilyPond first produce data in > memory, i.e. Scheme data > representing the whole score, and then either to produce the score or a MIDI > file or supply this > data to other applications, such as a Mu

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

;>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 06.05.2018 um 11:43 schrieb Jacques Menu Muzhic: >>>>>> Hello Urs, >>>>>> >>>>>> musicsml2ly and Finale 2014 behave as expected, but MuseScore 2.2.1 >>>> pro

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

find a simple nobeam.ly and the file nobeam.xml, which is the result from exporting with the current master of python-ly. This will be opened without beams in MuseScore 2. nobeam-withbeams.xml is the result of exporting from the branch xml-handle-beams (my current pull request). The XML file I or

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

beams, there's no >> way (without substantial work to redo LilyPond's autobeaming (and >> beaming pattern) in Python). >>> >>> Thanks for testing >>> Urs >>> >>>> >>>> Strange… >>>> >>

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

, Urs Liska a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hello Jacques, >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 06.05.2018 um 10:11 schrieb Jacques Menu Muzhic: >>>>> Hello Urs, >>>>> >>>>> I’m doing tests with MusicXML, could you sen

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

; I’m doing tests with MusicXML, could you send me an example where >>>> MuseScore doesn’t show any beams after exporting from LilyPond? >>> Attached you'll find a simple nobeam.ly and the file nobeam.xml, which is >>> the result from exporting with the current master

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

beam.ly and the file nobeam.xml, which is the result from exporting with the current master of python-ly. This will be opened without beams in MuseScore 2. nobeam-withbeams.xml is the result of exporting from the branch xml-handle-beams (my current pull request). The XML file I originally sent was al

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

.xml, which is >> the result from exporting with the current master of python-ly. This will be >> opened without beams in MuseScore 2. > > I am getting beams in MuseScore 2.2.1, Linux Fedora 28. > >> nobeam-withbeams.xml is the result of exporting from the branch >&

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

On Sun, 6 May 2018, Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote: musicsml2ly and Finale 2014 behave as expected, but MuseScore 2.2.1 produces beams in both cases, i.e. even when there are no beams in the MusicXML data. Strange… My guess is that MuseScore does things it isn't supposed to do. Which can some

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

obeam-withbeams.xml is the result of exporting from the branch xml-handle-beams (my current pull request). Looks the same to me in MuseScore. I am getting four 1/8 notes in a 4/4 time bar. BTW: Does anyone know how to insert more notes in that bar in MuseScore? If I try, it jumps to the next bar,

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

e > result from exporting with the current master of python-ly. This will be > opened without beams in MuseScore 2. > nobeam-withbeams.xml is the result of exporting from the branch > xml-handle-beams (my current pull request). The XML file I originally sent > was also crea

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

s the result from exporting with the current master of python-ly. This will be opened without beams in MuseScore 2. nobeam-withbeams.xml is the result of exporting from the branch xml-handle-beams (my current pull request). The XML file I originally sent was also created from that branch. Thank

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

it. >> All the others allow testing w/o save/export functionality, but Steinberg is >> much more restrictive in that respect. >> > > On the Facebook group I got a screenshot of Dorico, so (not unexpectedly) > this works too. > > So my conclusion is: we can export faul

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

tart it. >> All the others allow testing w/o save/export functionality, but Steinberg is >> much more restrictive in that respect. >> > > On the Facebook group I got a screenshot of Dorico, so (not unexpectedly) > this works too. > > So my conclusion is:

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

start it. > All the others allow testing w/o save/export functionality, but Steinberg is > much more restrictive in that respect. > On the Facebook group I got a screenshot of Dorico, so (not unexpectedly) this works too. So my conclusion is: we can export faulty XML, and Finale, Sibeli

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

Hi Urs, Sibelius works fine: As my Dorico evaluation period has expired, I can't even start it. All the others allow testing w/o save/export functionality, but Steinberg is much more restrictive in that respect. All the be

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

beam start and end encoded >> by python-ly and then (so far manually) add >> >> continue >> >> to each note, regardless of the actual beaming pattern situation, >> MuseScore will correctly import the XML file (and add the correct >> encoding when re-exporting t

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

ituation, MuseScore will correctly import the XML file (and add the correct encoding when re-exporting to XML). While I know this is not a correct export I think it would be a good start and in any case better than nothing. But I would like to know what the other programs will do with the code. So I&#

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

h even > isn't fully correct either). > > However, I realized that when I have the beam start and end encoded by > python-ly and then (so far manually) add > > continue > > to each note, regardless of the actual beaming pattern situation, MuseScore > will c

Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

ond (which even isn't fully correct either). However, I realized that when I have the beam start and end encoded by python-ly and then (so far manually) add     continue to each note, regardless of the actual beaming pattern situation, MuseScore will correctly import the XML file

Re: XML import (WAS: A premiere by Daahoud Salim, typeset with LilyPond)

On 15/08/17 20:55, Francisco Vila wrote: > All in all, one of the most usefulness of LilyPond is completely lost, > which is to make beautifully typeset music automatically from a terse, > meaningful symbolic language. > It must be said, however, that a blind Spanish user today told me that somethi

Re: XML import (WAS: A premiere by Daahoud Salim, typeset with LilyPond)

On 15/08/17 20:25, Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote: > Hello Francisco, > >> - The converted code has \stemUp and \stemDown in every single note, >> which had to be searched and replaced. Also all articulations are >> forced up or down. > > Don’t know why musicxml2ly recently enforced such behavior, with

Re: XML import (WAS: A premiere by Daahoud Salim, typeset with LilyPond)

Hello Francisco, > - The converted code has \stemUp and \stemDown in every single note, which > had to be searched and replaced. Also all articulations are forced up or > down. Don’t know why musicxml2ly recently enforced such behavior, without any option to prevent it. The same holds for \po

Re: XML import (WAS: A premiere by Daahoud Salim, typeset with LilyPond)

ond would be well served by a converter that takes > all the pitches/durations and things like time signatures needed to make > sense of them and ignores everything else. Yes, I'd like to hack the musicxml2ly, if I only could, to filter the conversion, as we can't do anything on the ex

Re: XML import (WAS: A premiere by Daahoud Salim, typeset with LilyPond)

On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 13:25 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: > From my work on Daahoud Salim's sextet, I can tell to those interested > some things to do and some not to. Today I am focusing on the XML > import alone. > > Long story short: avoid it. [...] > > My advice to a

XML import (WAS: A premiere by Daahoud Salim, typeset with LilyPond)

>From my work on Daahoud Salim's sextet, I can tell to those interested some things to do and some not to. Today I am focusing on the XML import alone. Long story short: avoid it. This is a very small piece when compared to dozens of huge works we all in the list have seen on the years

Re: Lilypond to read xml piano sheet music and output it with a number added to each note relative to middle c

Petri Moilanen writes: > Can Lilypond be used to import xml piano sheet music XML import quality is so-so. Expect to hand-edit afterwards. > and then run a snippet which will calculate a relative position for > each note against middle c and output the same back as pdf having the

Re: Lilypond to read xml piano sheet music and output it with a number added to each note relative to middle c

a >> écrit : >> >> Can Lilypond be used to import xml piano sheet music and then run a snippet >> which will calculate a >> relative position for each note against middle c and output the same back as >> pdf having the number >> added below each note on t

Re: Lilypond to read xml piano sheet music and output it with a number added to each note relative to middle c

Hello Petri, Can you supply a drawing showing how you want the numbers placed? That’s not clear to me. JM > Le 31 juil. 2017 à 08:34, Petri Moilanen a > écrit : > > Can Lilypond be used to import xml piano sheet music and then run a snippet > which will calculate a > rel

Lilypond to read xml piano sheet music and output it with a number added to each note relative to middle c

Can Lilypond be used to import xml piano sheet music and then run a snippet which will calculate a relative position for each note against middle c and output the same back as pdf having the number added below each note on the right and left staff ? The middle c would start from 1 and then b would

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

the xlm-file that can be downloaded from this link >> here? >> >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/512573/FileChute/Kyrie_copy.zip >> >> Best regards, >> Robert >> >> >> On 15 May 2017, at 08:22 , Leszek Wroński wrote: >> >&

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

st regards, > Robert > > > On 15 May 2017, at 08:22 , Leszek Wroński wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > thanks! It's interesting that all is fine on a Mac. I just wanted to > mention that I'm only using Finale, that is, Windows, to produce the > XML. I then switch to Ub

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

On Fri 12 May 2017 at 11:59:05 (+0100), Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" > To: ; > Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 11:00 AM > Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again > >Am 12.05.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: > >>D

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

to the output as opposed to all the > >normal strings that are generated by the conversion program. These > >original strings would carry their encoding with them. > If you are meaning finale is producing the wrong xml, I can tell you > Sibelius, musescore and capella also ha

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, with a fix

On Sun 14 May 2017 at 15:35:51 (+0100), Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" > To: > Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2017 3:06 PM > Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again > >Am 14.05.2017 um 16:03 schrieb Phil Holmes: > >>I&#x

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

On 15 May 2017, at 08:22 , Leszek Wroński wrote: > Hi Robert, > > thanks! It's interesting that all is fine on a Mac. I just wanted to > mention that I'm only using Finale, that is, Windows, to produce the > XML. I then switch to Ubuntu 16.04 to use musicxml2ly beca

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:06:47 +0200, Urs Liska wrote: > But can that be? Shouldn't MusicXML allow arbitrary regular Unicode > characters? Yes, but the file should be encoded using a single encoding. In this case, some parts of the file are UTF-8 encoded while other parts are UTF-16. ___

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

- Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" To: Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2017 3:06 PM Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again Am 14.05.2017 um 16:03 schrieb Phil Holmes: I've just confirmed Ian Ring's suggestion - removing the copyright symbol allows the convers

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

Am 14.05.2017 um 16:03 schrieb Phil Holmes: > I've just confirmed Ian Ring's suggestion - removing the copyright > symbol allows the conversion to continue, but results in text with > spurious null characters. But can that be? Shouldn't MusicXML allow arbitrary regular Unicode characters? Urs -

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

- Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes" To: "Leszek Wronski" ; Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2017 2:31 PM Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again - Original Message - From: "Leszek Wronski" To: Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:54 PM Subject: Re:

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

- Original Message - From: "Leszek Wronski" To: Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:54 PM Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again Dear Phil, I read through the 2 pages of comments at the link you provided. Is the ultimate suggestion the one in your last comment, that is,

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

d was made with TeXShop. Incidentally, It is not really necessary to make a copy of the code generated by Frescobaldi from the xml-file. I can open and process the .ly -file with TeXShop just as well. But for most of the scores I make I have to do quite a lot of editing for which I always use

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

th with LilyPond version 2.18.2 and 2.19.58.1). So with Frescobaldi you import the XML (which uses the musicxml2ly program; you posted the .ly) and then produce the PDF (posted). What's the role of TeXShop? What process did it carry out? > You can find the results here: > > htt

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

com/u/512573/FileChute/LilyPond-test_Kyrie_from_xml-file.zip So apparently for a Mac there is nothing wrong, neither with your xml-file nor with recent musicxml2ly. It may be of litte help to you (as long as you stay on Windows ;-)) but it could perhaps help you in narrowing down the search for the s

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

original strings would carry their encoding with them. > > If you are meaning finale is producing the wrong xml, I can tell you Sibelius, musescore and capella also have this problem. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

ntly been > > introduced. Does anyone know or can anyone find out when this happened > > (by trying musicxml2ly from different LilyPond versions)? > > My guess would rather be on some auto-encoding/decoding choice by > Python, possibly triggered by badly (or unexpectedly?) encod

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

- Original Message - From: "Leszek Wronski" To: Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:54 PM Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again Dear Phil, I read through the 2 pages of comments at the link you provided. Is the ultimate suggestion the one in your last comment, that is,

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

Dear Phil, I read through the 2 pages of comments at the link you provided. Is the ultimate suggestion the one in your last comment, that is, "I believe this patch requires Python 2.7, and we ship 2.4. As a result, windows users can no longer use musicxml2ly." ? If so, I should just mention that

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

Dear Guys, first, thank you very much for the replies! Second, for a little bit of detective work. I have not updated my Finale in years, so if it produced correct XML files in the past, it should do the same now (I always write using a similar really basic setup, since actual editing is to be

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

- Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" To: ; Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 11:00 AM Subject: Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again Am 12.05.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: Dear Leszek, when I look with hexdump, I see a lot of NUL-bytes inside the file. And it seems

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

Urs Liska writes: > Am 12.05.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: >> Dear Leszek, >> >> when I look with hexdump, I see a lot of NUL-bytes inside the file. >> And it seems to me that the strings are in UTF-16 and the rest in >> latin-1 or the like. At least it seems like a mixture of encodings.

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

> Am 12.05.2017 um 11:14 schrieb Leszek Wroński: >> Dear Guys, >> >> I see a similar issue has been discussed recently, so apologies for >> bringing it up again, but I want to highlight a different aspect of >> it, at least I think I do -- sorry if I'm mistaken.

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

Guys, I was a bit too quick with 'It all looks OK in Hex". When I opend the .ly in Emacs I saw "^@" characters after all letters ("t^@i^@m^@e^@" etc). I removed all of them. This almost did the trick and finally the file was compilable after a few minor edits. So it seems that the 'EOF' issue is

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

On Fri, 12 May 2017 11:14:53 +0200, Leszek Wroński wrote: > I looked at the file using > a Hex viewer and I see nothing wrong with it. The strings like "Finale ..." and some other parts of the file are multy-byte (UTF-16) encoded while the rest of the file is single-byte, so LilyPond interprets

Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

a similar issue has been discussed recently, so apologies for bringing it up again, but I want to highlight a different aspect of it, at least I think I do -- sorry if I'm mistaken. My point is that the .ly code converted from .xml does not compile simply under lilypond (I'm using 2.19.48

XML to .ly and Lilypond, again

Dear Guys, I see a similar issue has been discussed recently, so apologies for bringing it up again, but I want to highlight a different aspect of it, at least I think I do -- sorry if I'm mistaken. My point is that the .ly code converted from .xml does not compile simply under lilypond

Your email address, was Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

If you don't want to receive emails at the address you post from, please try setting a Reply-To: header on your emails like the one in this email's header. Mail-Followup-To: should work too. On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:18:39 (+0200), zs.has...@gmx.de wrote: > Hallo, > [...] ist meine Emailadresse für

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

On Fri 28 Apr 2017 at 10:32:14 (+0100), Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: > To: > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:19 AM > Subject: Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows > > > >Am 2017-04-28 10:33, schrieb zs.has...@gmx.de: > >>I

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

Hello zs, Thanks for sending me the XML files. musicxml2ly as of 2.19.58 produces error-prone LilyPond code for tempo commands in La-valse-opaline-ende.xml like: \tempo 4=112 ^ "m" | % 1 \stemUp b2 _\mf \stemUp d4 -4 ^ "i" | % 2 There is nothing to attach this mark

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

:\\users\\stephan\\appdata\\local\\temp\\frescobaldi-ldipza\\tmpxdwdcp\\La -valse-opaline-ende-1.ly" Wurde mit dem Return-Code 1 beendet. > > >> >> >> Is seems not to be a matter of the xml-source, because I have the &g

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

% additional definitions required by the score: \language "deutsch" \header { encodingsoftware = " Is seems not to be a matter of the xml-source, because I have the problem with xml-files created by - Musescore - Capella - Sibelius > >>

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

- Original Message - From: To: Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:19 AM Subject: Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows Am 2017-04-28 10:33, schrieb zs.has...@gmx.de: I know this problem science 2.19.4? Can you determine which was the first Frescobaldi release where this happened

XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

I know this problem science 2.19.4? After someone asks today on the german forum about this problem, I want to tell the list about that problem. It is not possible after importing the xml-File into Frescobaldi to work with the import result. But the import looks normal. Opening the result with

Re: Finale Notepad xml file vs musicxml2ly

You should send the Finale xml files with the message, that's the only starting point you can deliver. No guarantee that this will help, but not sending them will be a guarantee to get no meaningful feedback. Urs Am 21.11.2014 22:42, schrieb Peter Teeson: Hi all: I am testing Finale No

Finale Notepad xml file vs musicxml2ly

Hi all: I am testing Finale NotePad (2012) and did the tutorial2.mus. Then Exported to xml. Then did a CLI using musicxml2ly. Only the first bar appears with notes, and they are not correct, The remaining bars are all rests. In fact there are 7 bars with notes in the Voice part. The Piano part

Re: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update

> it's tedious as it sounds :-(( -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/I-was-unable-to-import-an-xml-ogan-file-from-Musescore-update-tp164243p164365.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Na

Re: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update

2014-07-10 21:52 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni : > See my file attached, all the measures are commented except the first and > the problem is still present. > This is not yet a minimal example. You should dig more. Try commenting > staff 2 and leave only staff one. Be careful to comment in the right >

Re: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update

- Original Message - From: "Son_V" To: Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:08 PM Subject: Re: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update Sorry but I can understand what a "tiny example" is, but I'm not able to make one ... and, about the &qu

Re: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update

- Original Message - From: "Son_V" To: Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:04 PM Subject: Re: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update Ok, but how can Denemo load the file that LilyPond can't open, and so makes Forte? Either because Denemo is m

Re: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update

Sorry but I can understand what a "tiny example" is, but I'm not able to make one ... and, about the "hand edit the XML source to get rid of the error in the PartGroupInfo section" ... what could i do??? :-( Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.10

  1   2   >