Sorry for the noise, it's my fault of not setting tupplet spanner duration in a
continuous triplets, not my example here.
Regards
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
My mother found a problem when I write continuous triplets. For example,
\time 4/4 c'4 c' \times 2/3 { c'8 d' e' } \times 2/3 { f' g' a' }
The two triplets are grouped like one sextupplet, but with two 3's. What's the
problem? Is it a wrong practice in notation convention? Is it controlled by
On 9/24/10 9:25 AM, "胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng" wrote:
> Hello,
> My mother found a problem when I write continuous triplets. For example,
> \time 4/4 c'4 c' \times 2/3 { c'8 d' e' } \times 2/3 { f' g' a' }
> The two triplets are grouped like one sextupplet, but with two 3's. What's the
> problem? Is
: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng
To: lilypond-user
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 4:25 PM
Subject: visual problem on two triplets in 4/4 time
Hello,
My mother found a problem when I write continuous triplets. For example,
\time 4/4 c'4 c' \times 2/3 { c'8 d' e' } \times
Hello,
My mother found a problem when I write continuous triplets. For example,
\time 4/4 c'4 c' \times 2/3 { c'8 d' e' } \times 2/3 { f' g' a' }
The two triplets are grouped like one sextupplet, but with two 3's. What's the
problem? Is it a wrong practice in notation convention? Is it controlle
