Re: tuplet slurs

2017-04-17 Thread Engraver
would of course need to build LilyPond to use it. (In my experience, it's no big deal to set up and use LilyDev.) -David Thanks for the answer. Than I should probably learn to build Lilypond from source myself. The tuplet slurs fit the music I'm engraving (baroque organ music) better

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-04-17 Thread David Nalesnik
_ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > Will this functionality (eventually) be available in 'standard' Lilypond? Or > should I learn how to buil

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-04-17 Thread Partitura Organum
stem. Thanks, David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Will this functionality (eventually) be available in 'standard' Lilypond? Or should I learn how to build Lilypond myself to be able to us

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-12 Thread Urs Liska
Am 11.02.2017 um 01:18 schrieb David Nalesnik: > Is the bracket notation fairly common? I've certainly seen the > slur-above notation. > I'm not sure if that adds something useful to that thread, but maybe one item where the community has seen this notation is https://www.musictypefoundry.com/w

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-12 Thread David Nalesnik
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:00 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> >>> The attached is better structured and it supports 'shorten-pair for >>> the slurs. >> >> Very nice! Please submit this :-) > > > Will do, just need to clean it up a little. I

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-12 Thread David Nalesnik
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> The attached is better structured and it supports 'shorten-pair for >> the slurs. > > Very nice! Please submit this :-) Will do, just need to clean it up a little. In the meantime, I've improved the slur shapes since the last patch.

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-12 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> The attached is better structured and it supports 'shorten-pair for > the slurs. Very nice! Please submit this :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-11 Thread Simon Albrecht
Hi David, I think this would make a great addition to the code base, regardless of how perfect the bezier shapes are. One could file an issue for improving that. I’d say: Please propose a patch. Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-u

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-11 Thread David Nalesnik
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 1:47 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 1:43 PM, David Nalesnik > wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >>> > For voices with lyrics it is common to put triplet indications > always above the staff, using the following

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-11 Thread David Nalesnik
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 1:43 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> For voices with lyrics it is common to put triplet indications always above the staff, using the following rules. . stems up or down, no beam: as usual (i.e.,

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-11 Thread David Nalesnik
Also, a full bracket might be used if the tuplet number >> wouldn't intersect the bracket. Maybe this should be default >> behavior? I know I've seen the bracket notation in Britten, albeit >> without the tuplet number. > > I think making lilypond provide unbroken

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
acket might be used if the tuplet number > wouldn't intersect the bracket. Maybe this should be default > behavior? I know I've seen the bracket notation in Britten, albeit > without the tuplet number. I think making lilypond provide unbroken tuplet slurs and brackets is a welcome

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-11 Thread J Martin Rushton
On 11/02/17 10:42, J Martin Rushton wrote: > On 11/02/17 00:18, David Nalesnik wrote: >> Hi Werner, >> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >>> >>> For voices with lyrics it is common to put triplet indications always >>> above the staff, using the following rules. >>> >>>

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-11 Thread J Martin Rushton
On 11/02/17 00:18, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi Werner, > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> >> For voices with lyrics it is common to put triplet indications always >> above the staff, using the following rules. >> >>. stems up or down, no beam: as usual (i.e., a numbe

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-10 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Werner, On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > For voices with lyrics it is common to put triplet indications always > above the staff, using the following rules. > >. stems up or down, no beam: as usual (i.e., a number and a bracket > at the top, as if using \tupl

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-10 Thread J Martin Rushton
On 09/02/17 18:53, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > For voices with lyrics it is common to put triplet indications always > above the staff, using the following rules. > >. stems up or down, no beam: as usual (i.e., a number and a bracket > at the top, as if using \tupletUp) > >. stems up,

tuplet slurs

2017-02-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
For voices with lyrics it is common to put triplet indications always above the staff, using the following rules. . stems up or down, no beam: as usual (i.e., a number and a bracket at the top, as if using \tupletUp) . stems up, with beam: as usual (i.e., a number over the beam) The