Peter Wannemacher wrote (13.06.2012 17:52):
>I would like to contribute to this cheat-sheet.
>I would be pleased to
create ideas or comment on those of others.
Excellent! I hope to make some sort of draft available in the next couple
of weeks to get the ball rolling from my point of view.
Che
>
>On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:49:16AM +0200, Philip Thomas wrote:
>> If that's correct, I guess your initial "thanks, but no thanks"
>> is directed more to the possibility of my becoming a more
>> serious contributor,
>
>Yes.
>
>> I'm inclined to try to knock together a draft expanded
On 13.06.2012 at 14:46, Colin Campbell wrote:
>I'd be willing to give you what help I can, Philip. My doc skills are
>rusty but I can usually get changes done, and if we get stumped, I can
>probably point you in a useful direction.
Most of my help will likely
>be encouraging emails, but by
On 12-06-13 05:07 AM, Philip Thomas wrote:
I wasn't
expecting this to be a tension-free exercise, especially having followed some
other recent threads with interest. Nor
am I going to deflate if an expanded cheatsheet doesn't materialize or doesn't
attract any interest. I'm not especially
toug
Blast! Resubmitted with apologies -- sent this a short while ago with an inept
subject heading. Sorry, Philip
_
Graham Percival wrote:
> I cannot in good conscience encourage anybody to become
involved
> with lilypond development at the present time unless they
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Philip Thomas
wrote:
>>On 13 June 2012 at 08:53, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>
>>As for mentoring, i could help you a bit, but not very much. And i
>
>>cannot promise anything since i am really busy for the next month :(
>>If you find the CG hard, it may be wise to wait
>On 13 June 2012 at 08:53, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>As for mentoring, i could help you a bit, but not very much. And i
>cannot promise anything since i am really busy for the next month :(
>If you find the CG hard, it may be wise to wait
until things get
>better organised.
I don't think I'll need
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:25:27AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> While I applaud the magnitude of your conscience, I consider your sense
>> of responsibility overblown. I would have no qualms encouraging people
>> into trying to get involved.
>
> That's because you are
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> [...]
> Or, to put it in a more cold-blooded way: I want to get the
> reputation of treating lilypond volunteers well, since that will
> encourage more people to volunteer. By discouraging people from
> having a hard time now, I'm gambling
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Philip Thomas wrote:
>>On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:49:16AM +0200, Philip Thomas wrote:
>
>>> I'm inclined to try to knock together a draft expanded cheatsheet on
>>> my own account and float it (e.g. in PDF format) on the user list.
>
>>On Wednesday 13 June 2012 at
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:25:27AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> While I applaud the magnitude of your conscience, I consider your sense
> of responsibility overblown. I would have no qualms encouraging people
> into trying to get involved.
That's because you are an excellent programmer, mathemat
>On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:49:16AM +0200, Philip Thomas wrote:
>> I'm inclined to try to knock together a draft expanded cheatsheet on
>> my own account and float it (e.g. in PDF format) on the user list.
>On Wednesday 13 June 2012 at 01:10, Graham Percival wrote:
>ok. It won't become part of
Graham Percival writes:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:58:37PM +0200, Philip Thomas wrote:
>> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Philip Thomas
>> >wrote:
>> >> I should mention that I'm no programmer. (And I wouldn't be offended
>> >> by a polite "thanks, but no
>> >> thanks".)
>
> I'm afraid that
2012/6/12 Philip Thomas :
> -- The Kainhofer cheatsheet costs money (albeit not much money), but
> LilyPond and all its documentation, as we all know and greatly appreciate,
> comes free.
A nicely coloured printed Kainhofer cheatsheet costs money, but its
code is creativecommons-attribution-noncom
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:49:16AM +0200, Philip Thomas wrote:
> If that's correct, I guess your initial "thanks, but no thanks"
> is directed more to the possibility of my becoming a more
> serious contributor,
Yes.
> I'm inclined to try to knock together a draft expanded
> cheatsheet on my own
>On Tuesday 12 June 2012 23:41, Graham Percival
>wrote:
>I'm afraid that my first reaction is "thanks, but no thanks". See below.
>Be warned that the CG is not actively maintained. I estimate that
>approximately 20% of the advice in the CG misleading, and 10% of the advice
>is harmful. It wa
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:58:37PM +0200, Philip Thomas wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Philip Thomas
> >wrote:
> >> I should mention that I'm no programmer. (And I wouldn't be offended
> >> by a polite "thanks, but no
> >> thanks".)
I'm afraid that my first reaction is "thanks, but no
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Philip Thomas
wrote:
> I'll look at the CG. But would an expanded cheatsheet would be useful?
You tell me :)
I suppose that it will be, but i'm not using it for some time, so i'm
not the best guy to judge.
> And is it the kind of thing that a comparative beginne
>On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Philip Thomas
>wrote:
>> I remember finding some gaps in the Cheat Sheet as a new user. Might
>> it be worth reviewing to see whether it could be expanded and improved
>> without over-burdening it with detail? If it would help for me as a
>> comparative beginner t
>>On 12 Jun 2012, at 20:46, "Philip Thomas"
wrote:
>> I remember finding some gaps in the Cheat Sheet as a new user. Might
>> it be worth reviewing to see whether it could be expanded and improved
>> without over-burdening it with detail?
>On 12 June 2012, at 21:58, James wrote:
>http://www.ed
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Philip Thomas wrote:
> I remember finding some gaps in the Cheat Sheet as a new user. Might it be
> worth reviewing to see whether it could be expanded and improved without
> over-burdening it with detail? If it would help for me as a comparative
> beginner to do s
On 12 Jun 2012, at 20:46, "Philip Thomas" wrote:
--
--
> I remember finding some gaps in the Cheat Sheet as a new user. Might it be
> worth reviewing to see whether it could be expanded and improved without
> over-burdening it with detail?
http://www.edition-kainhofer.com/en/lilypond/details/211
>> Janek Warcho? writes:
>>
>>> I'm not sure. This is a music notation question: "what's this?".
>>> Lily documentation aims to answer different kind of questions: "how do
>>> i engrave this?" and it assumes that the user knows what's what he
>>> wants.
>> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>> She wants
Thank you Janek, Phil, Jan & Jay. BTW Ming is a male name.
Blessing in+,
Ming.
>
> From: Janek Warchoł
>To: Phil Holmes
>Cc: Jan Nieuwenhuizen ; MING TSANG ;
>lilypond-usermailinglist
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:43:01 AM
&g
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Note_value
lol! look at the flagged notes: some are from Lily, some from Sibelius :P
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l
Still the same answer: a breve. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_whole_note
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: MING TSANG
To: lilypond-usermailinglist
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 4:23 PM
Subject: transcribe notes
Sorry, forgot to include sample .png file
Sorry, forgot to include sample .png file.
Blessing in+,
- Forwarded Message -
>From: MING TSANG
>To: lilypond-usermailinglist
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:42:50 AM
>Subject: transcribe notes
>
>
>Hi, lily users:
>
>
>I am transcribe a music score
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
To: "Janek Warchoł"
Cc: "MING TSANG" ; "lilypond-usermailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: transcribe notes
Janek Warchoł writes:
I'm not sure. This is a
Janek Warchoł writes:
> I'm not sure. This is a music notation question: "what's this?".
> Lily documentation aims to answer different kind of questions: "how do
> i engrave this?" and it assumes that the user knows what's what he
> wants.
She wants a certain type of note. Chances are that she
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Jay Anderson writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, MING TSANG wrote:
>>> I am transcribe a music score to lilypond and came across a note with
>>> vertical line on both side. What is this called and how to code in lily to
>>> ge
Jay Anderson writes:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, MING TSANG wrote:
>> I am transcribe a music score to lilypond and came across a note with
>> vertical line on both side. What is this called and how to code in lily to
>> generate it?
>
> Most likely a breve: { c\breve }
We now have two h
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, MING TSANG wrote:
> I am transcribe a music score to lilypond and came across a note with
> vertical line on both side. What is this called and how to code in lily to
> generate it?
Most likely a breve: { c\breve }
-Jay
_
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:42 PM, MING TSANG wrote:
> Hi, lily users:
>
> I am transcribe a music score to lilypond and came across a note with
> vertical line on both side. What is this called and how to code in lily to
> generate it?
I suppose it's a breve note. It can have single or double li
Hi, lily users:
I am transcribe a music score to lilypond and came across a note with vertical
line on both side. What is this called and how to code in lily to generate it?
Blessing in+,
Ming.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
h
34 matches
Mail list logo
