>>On 12 Jun 2012, at 20:46, "Philip Thomas" <philip.tho...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
>> I remember finding some gaps in the Cheat Sheet as a new user. Might >> it be worth reviewing to see whether it could be expanded and improved >> without over-burdening it with detail? >On 12 June 2012, at 21:58, James <pkx1...@gmail.com> wrote: >http://www.edition-kainhofer.com/en/lilypond/details/2111/lilypond-cheatshe et.html Thanks, James. I wasn't aware of this product, and I have no reason to think that it's anything other than a good one. Just a few observations: -- A cheatsheet is already part of LilyPond's own documentation, and that seems proper to me. It's a tool for people who use LilyPond, particularly new users wanting to learn basic stuff. It should, if it's a useful tool, ideally be maintained and improved over time as part of LilyPond's own documentation. -- Such a cheatsheet ought to be available in electronic form, as well as being printer-friendly, to enable users to copy code for slightly less basic operations (assuming it is expanded in that direction), and to enable users to follow links (e.g. to common templates). -- The Kainhofer cheatsheet costs money (albeit not much money), but LilyPond and all its documentation, as we all know and greatly appreciate, comes free. Cheers, Philip _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
