On Tue 25 Feb 2025 at 13:41:58 (+0100), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> The implicit instantiation of items is something almost always creating
> problems for me. I agree that without it, the code would be very verbose
> even for very simple situations but in the end, I have the impression that
> it does
>
>
> > *If* I understood correctly, if I instantiate the first voice as you
> propose the voice will go in a different context then 'd4'.
>
> That's the contrary. If you instantiate the first Voice (directly after
> the \new Staff command, not after <<, maybe I was not clear enough in my
> previou
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 12:48, Gianmaria Lari
wrote:
>
> *If* I understood correctly, if I instantiate the first voice as you
propose the voice will go in a different context then 'd4'.
That's the contrary. If you instantiate the first Voice (directly after the
\new Staff command, not after <<, ma
[...]
> You are not explicitly instantiating the first voice.
> Replace \new Staff by \new Staff \new Voice and you have the expected
> output.
>
*If* I understood correctly, if I instantiate the first voice as you
propose the voice will go in a different context then 'd4'. This can be ok
or not
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 11:14, Gianmaria Lari
wrote:
>
> I did some tests and I discovered something that's not clear.
>
> Why in the following code the very last note `d4` stem is up?
>
> %%%
> \version "2.25.23"
> \fixed c' \new Staff
> {
> %a1
> <<
> {\voiceTwo a,4 d g c' }
> \new Vo
I did some tests and I discovered something that's not clear.
Why in the following code the very last note `d4` stem is up?
%%%
\version "2.25.23"
\fixed c' \new Staff
{
%a1
<<
{\voiceTwo a,4 d g c' }
\new Voice {\voiceOne r1 }
>>
d4 % stem up
}
%%%
I didn't call \oneVoice so I
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 8:39 AM Gianmaria Lari
wrote:
> Thanks Knute, very clear example. And thanks David also for your reply.
>
> What's about \oneVoice? In my examples adding or removing it doesn't
> change the output.
>
>>
>> > >> \fixed c' \new Staff
>> > >> {
>> > >> \incipit
>> > >> <<
ote:
> > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 16:18, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
> > >> When I need to write a temporary polyphonic passage my code looks
> similar
> > >> to this:
>
> > >> \fixed c' \new Staff
> > >> {
> > >>
On Mon 24 Feb 2025 at 07:58:19 (-0800), Knute Snortum wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 16:18, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> >> When I need to write a temporary polyphonic passage my code looks similar
> >> to this:
> >> \fixed c' \new Staff
> >> {
&
6:18, Gianmaria Lari
> wrote:
>
>> When I need to write a temporary polyphonic passage my code looks similar
>> to this:
>>
>> %%%
>>
>> \version "2.25.23"
>>
>> incipit = {c4 4 4 4}
>> conclusion = {c4 4 4 4}
>> voiceA
Sorry, I also forgot to mention that at the end of my polyphonic passage I
normally forgot to mention (like I forgot in my previous code) the
\oneVoice statement. What could happen without it?
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 16:18, Gianmaria Lari
wrote:
> When I need to write a temporary polypho
When I need to write a temporary polyphonic passage my code looks similar
to this:
%%%
\version "2.25.23"
incipit = {c4 4 4 4}
conclusion = {c4 4 4 4}
voiceA = {c4 d e f}
voiceB = {b4 a g f}
\fixed c' \new Staff
{
\incipit %monodic
<<
\new Voice {\voiceOne \v
2014-04-05 22:09 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Federico,
>
>
> 2014-04-05 21:56 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni :
>
> I'm typesetting a two voice piece which needs a temporary third voice in
>> one bar only.
>> The problem is that I'm using Staff + TabStaff, s
Hi Federico,
2014-04-05 21:56 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni :
> I'm typesetting a two voice piece which needs a temporary third voice in
> one bar only.
> The problem is that I'm using Staff + TabStaff, so the following minimal
> example creates an extra staff. Comment the TabStaff block and the pro
I'm typesetting a two voice piece which needs a temporary third voice in
one bar only.
The problem is that I'm using Staff + TabStaff, so the following minimal
example creates an extra staff. Comment the TabStaff block and the problem
doesn't exist.
\version "2.18.2"
upper = \relative c' {
c1
15 matches
Mail list logo
