Re: DevNull produces strange output

2013-05-10 Thread Janek Warchoł
2012/10/29 David Kastrup : > The definition of Devnull is > > \context { > \name "Devnull" > \type "Engraver_group" > > %% don't want to route anything out of here: > \alias "Staff" > \alias "Voice" > \description "Silently discards all musical information given to this > context." > } >

Re: strange output with lilypond book

2013-01-23 Thread Marek Klein
Hello, 2013/1/21 Julien Rioux > Indeed, there is a bug here: the automatic line width detection fails > because of the included file. This detection is done by copying the latex > preamble to a temporary file in a temp dir, running latex on this file, and > parsing some output about the line widt

Re: strange output with lilypond book

2013-01-21 Thread Julien Rioux
On 18/01/2013 4:56 PM, Stefan Thomas wrote: Dear community, when I compile the following file with latex and lilypondbook, it looks quite strange. There's is a break after every bar of the lilypond example. I think it has to do with the input-command. Here is the code of the latex-file: \docume

Re: strange output with lilypond book

2013-01-21 Thread Julien Rioux
On 20/01/2013 4:35 AM, Stefan Thomas wrote: Dear Julien, the problem is the input command in latex. Without it (when I define the commands in the document itself), the pdf looks good but if the file is included, every bar of the music uses a single line. I would like to avoid it an I would like t

Re: strange output with lilypond book

2013-01-20 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear Julien, the problem is the input command in latex. Without it (when I define the commands in the document itself), the pdf looks good but if the file is included, every bar of the music uses a single line. I would like to avoid it an I would like to use the input command in latex. On 19/01/2

Re: strange output with lilypond book

2013-01-19 Thread Julien Rioux
On 19/01/2013 1:17 PM, Stefan Thomas wrote: Dear Julien, unfortunately the blank line (do Yoy mean "\\"?) doesn't help! I mean a blank, empty line. %---snippet--- \begin{flushright} Name, Vorname: \end{flushright} \textbf{First exercise:} \begin{lilypond} \relative { c d e f g2 e g 4 f e

Re: strange output with lilypond book

2013-01-19 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear Julien, unfortunately the blank line (do Yoy mean "\\"?) doesn't help! On 18/01/2013 4:56 PM, Stefan Thomas wrote: > > Dear community, > > when I compile the following file with latex and lilypondbook, it looks > > quite strange. > > There's is a break after every bar of the lilypond example.

Re: strange output with lilypond book

2013-01-18 Thread Julien Rioux
On 18/01/2013 4:56 PM, Stefan Thomas wrote: Dear community, when I compile the following file with latex and lilypondbook, it looks quite strange. There's is a break after every bar of the lilypond example. I think it has to do with the input-command. Here is the code of the latex-file: \docume

strange output with lilypond book

2013-01-18 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear community, when I compile the following file with latex and lilypondbook, it looks quite strange. There's is a break after every bar of the lilypond example. I think it has to do with the input-command. Here is the code of the latex-file: > \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article} > \usepackage[

Re: DevNull produces strange output

2012-10-29 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/10/29 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> Hi, >> >> accidently I noticed that DevNull produces some weird output, if its >> argument contains an override to TabStaff, VaticanaStaff or >> RhythmicStaff (this list may be not complete) >> >> \version "2.17.4" >> >> mus = { >> \o

Re: DevNull produces strange output

2012-10-29 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > Hi, > > accidently I noticed that DevNull produces some weird output, if its > argument contains an override to TabStaff, VaticanaStaff or > RhythmicStaff (this list may be not complete) > > \version "2.17.4" > > mus = { > \override TabStaff.TabNoteHead #'color = #

DevNull produces strange output

2012-10-29 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi, accidently I noticed that DevNull produces some weird output, if its argument contains an override to TabStaff, VaticanaStaff or RhythmicStaff (this list may be not complete) \version "2.17.4" mus = { \override TabStaff.TabNoteHead #'color = #red % same with: % \overr

Re: Strange output of \addFingering

2012-08-02 Thread and...@andis59.se
On 2012-08-02 17:33, and...@andis59.se wrote: On 2012-08-02 17:18, Thomas Morley wrote: 2012/8/2 and...@andis59.se : I'm using the scheme function \addFingering to add string numbers to a music part. You could call the function below in \melody (I named it \xy. You may want to change this uni

Re: Strange output of \addFingering

2012-08-02 Thread and...@andis59.se
On 2012-08-02 17:34, and...@andis59.se wrote: On 2012-08-02 17:08, -Eluze wrote: I think you have to use another font, e.g. \override StringNumber #'font-name = "Garamond bold" and override the size to your needs: \override StringNumber #'font-size = #-1 hth Eluze I can't get this to w

Re: Strange output of \addFingering

2012-08-02 Thread and...@andis59.se
On 2012-08-02 17:08, -Eluze wrote: I think you have to use another font, e.g. \override StringNumber #'font-name = "Garamond bold" and override the size to your needs: \override StringNumber #'font-size = #-1 hth Eluze I can't get this to work! Where should I put the overrides? // A

Re: Strange output of \addFingering

2012-08-02 Thread and...@andis59.se
On 2012-08-02 17:18, Thomas Morley wrote: 2012/8/2 and...@andis59.se : I'm using the scheme function \addFingering to add string numbers to a music part. You could call the function below in \melody (I named it \xy. You may want to change this uninspired term.) :) xy = \override StringNumber #

Re: Strange output of \addFingering

2012-08-02 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/8/2 and...@andis59.se : > I'm using the scheme function \addFingering to add string numbers to a music > part. > Since my music is supposed to be played on a Pedal Steel Guitar I need some > special string numbers. > > On the Pedal Steel Guitar there are 10 string (may be more or less, but thi

Re: Strange output of \addFingering

2012-08-02 Thread -Eluze
, e.g. \override StringNumber #'font-name = "Garamond bold" and override the size to your needs: \override StringNumber #'font-size = #-1 hth Eluze -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Strange-output-of-%5CaddFingering-tp34245819p34246022.html Sent fr

Re: strange output

2011-02-16 Thread Phil Holmes
Yes - this is a known issue: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1412 Just ignore the error message. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Mario Moles To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 11:06 AM Subject: Re: strange output

Re: strange output

2011-02-16 Thread Mario Moles
In data martedì 15 febbraio 2011 13:52:32, hai scritto: > See "Known issues and warnings" in the Notation Reference, section 1.2.6, > Grace notes. > > -- > Phil Holmes > Ok! Solved! But now this is the log: Processing `Impromptu.ly' Analisi... Interpreting music... Preprocessing graphical object

Re: strange output

2011-02-15 Thread Phil Holmes
See "Known issues and warnings" in the Notation Reference, section 1.2.6, Grace notes. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Mario Moles To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 12:14 PM Subject: strange output Double time and time i

Re: strange output

2011-02-15 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
Same thing hit the French list a couple days ago. Oddly, my heavily-krunked-out version of the source doesn't reproduce this result, but I would recommend (by way of Xavier Scheuer) adding \grace { s8 } to the beginning of all your parts. Cheers, MS On Feb 15, 2011, at 7:14 AM, Mario Moles wrot

Re: Strange output from convert-ly

2009-02-19 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/2/19 Graham Percival : > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:31:41PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote: >> What really concerns me is the possibility that a massive loss of >> information could be happening in mutopiaproject, for example. > > Old story, with an old solution. Volunteer to work on convert-ly

Re: Strange output from convert-ly

2009-02-19 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:31:41PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote: > What really concerns me is the possibility that a massive loss of > information could be happening in mutopiaproject, for example. Old story, with an old solution. Volunteer to work on convert-ly (probably as part of the Frogs). W

Re: Strange output from convert-ly

2009-02-18 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/2/18 Mats Bengtsson : > As far as I can see, it's some kind of debug printout that has been left > over and should be removed from convert-ly. Right. The attached patch removes the debug print command. >> ... The worst part is to locate >> _every_ occurrence of a tie in the music, and delete

Re: Strange output from convert-ly

2009-02-18 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Quoting Francisco Vila : 2009/2/18 Robin Bannister : Mats Bengtsson wrote: try to nail down which conversion rule The rule for 2.1.27 (re tuning) prints this. I've found that this minimal file %% \version "1.5.68" \property Staff.transposing = #-2 %% gives this when converted

Re: Strange output from convert-ly

2009-02-18 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/2/18 Robin Bannister : > Mats Bengtsson wrote: >> >> try to nail down which conversion rule > > The rule for 2.1.27 (re tuning) prints this. I've found that this minimal file %% \version "1.5.68" \property Staff.transposing = #-2 %% gives this when converted: %% 5 [0, 2, 4,

Re: Strange output from convert-ly

2009-02-18 Thread Robin Bannister
Mats Bengtsson wrote: try to nail down which conversion rule The rule for 2.1.27 (re tuning) prints this. Cheers, Robin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Strange output from convert-ly

2009-02-18 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Francisco Vila wrote: Hello, I have a file starting with \version "1.5.68" and first lines of the convert-ly output are 5 [0, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9] 10 1 5 5 [0, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9] 10 1 5 5 [0, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9] 10 1 5 \version "2.12.0" That's weird. I cannot repeat the problem using an input file with j

Strange output from convert-ly

2009-02-18 Thread Francisco Vila
Hello, I have a file starting with \version "1.5.68" and first lines of the convert-ly output are 5 [0, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9] 10 1 5 5 [0, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9] 10 1 5 5 [0, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9] 10 1 5 \version "2.12.0" Does anybody know, where does that come from? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.