On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 15:15 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you tell me what's the "meaning" of a stem which connects a note in
> a voice to a rest (?) in another voice?
> See image attached.
>
> Is it good output? (I think it's been engraved in Finale)
> If so, how can I get it in Li
ge in context:
http://old.nabble.com/stem-across-voices-tp33953167p33954604.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2012/6/3 Federico Bruni :
(...)
Am 03.06.2012 16:45, schrieb Thomas Morley:
>>> But you can't hold the e on the 6th string as a crotchet.
>>>
>
> you mean it should be e4. instead of e8~ e4?
> this is just a notational issue, it is playable
> I guess I'm missing what you mean
(...)
Well, the
Il 03/06/2012 18:37, Eluze ha scritto:
Am 03.06.2012 17:18, schrieb Thomas Morley:
2012/6/3 Eluze:
Am 03.06.2012 16:45, schrieb Thomas Morley:
Not really.
It is physically _impossible_ to play
\relative c { \clef "G_8"<<{ e,8 [f] } \\ { e4}>> }
on a common six-string guitar. (first beat of
Hi all,
As a composer, I can say that I often use "incorrect" notation in order to
highlight voice-leading and intentions regarding articulation/stress/etc.
In particular, my Chaconne for unaccompanied violin has many "unplayable"
passages, which sound quite lovely when played "correctly". =)
Am 03.06.2012 17:18, schrieb Thomas Morley:
2012/6/3 Eluze:
Am 03.06.2012 16:45, schrieb Thomas Morley:
Not really.
It is physically _impossible_ to play
\relative c { \clef "G_8"<<{ e,8 [f] } \\ { e4}>> }
on a common six-string guitar. (first beat of the bar)
-Harm
it took me approx.
2012/6/3 Eluze :
>
>
> Am 03.06.2012 16:45, schrieb Thomas Morley:
>
>>
>> Not really.
>> It is physically _impossible_ to play
>> \relative c { \clef "G_8"<<{ e,8 [f] } \\ { e4}>> }
>> on a common six-string guitar. (first beat of the bar)
>>
>> -Harm
>
>
> it took me approx. 3 seconds to change
Am 03.06.2012 16:45, schrieb Thomas Morley:
Not really.
It is physically _impossible_ to play
\relative c { \clef "G_8"<<{ e,8 [f] } \\ { e4}>> }
on a common six-string guitar. (first beat of the bar)
-Harm
it took me approx. 3 seconds to change the tuning of the 6-th string
down to d -
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>> 2012/6/3 Janek Warchoł :
>>> This is a correct engraving.
>>
>> Not really.
>> It is physically _impossible_ to play
>> \relative c { \clef "G_8" <<{ e,8 [f] } \\ { e4}>> }
>> on a common six-string guitar. (first
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2012/6/3 Janek Warchoł :
>> This is a correct engraving.
>
> Not really.
> It is physically _impossible_ to play
> \relative c { \clef "G_8" <<{ e,8 [f] } \\ { e4}>> }
> on a common six-string guitar. (first beat of the bar)
indeed - i overlo
David Kastrup writes:
> "voicing" is an important and advanced skill for most instruments:
> guitar, violin, pianoforte (much more so than with plucked keyboards
> like harpsichord and spinett), accordion: the important thing is to
> lend each _voice_ a consistent character (loudness, articulatio
2012/6/3 Federico Bruni :
> Il 03/06/2012 16:04, David Nalesnik ha scritto:
>
>> This sort of notation is very common. Rather than notating only what is
>> physically possible for the player, the notator tries to show the
>> musical sense of the passage.
If you'd try to notate exactly what's to b
David Nalesnik writes:
> This sort of notation is very common. Rather than notating only what
> is physically possible for the player, the notator tries to show the
> musical sense of the passage.
It's not actually even physically impossible: most instruments allow you
more than a binary tone-o
Il 03/06/2012 16:04, David Nalesnik ha scritto:
This sort of notation is very common. Rather than notating only what is
physically possible for the player, the notator tries to show the
musical sense of the passage. So, here, we have two voices, and the
notator is trying to show each voice comp
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> I'm referring to the third beat of the bar.
> I'm wondering what the author means with that stem which connects the F in
> second voice to the beam in first voice.
>
> Yes, you are right: they are sharing the same notehead.
> But I think it's
Hi Federico,
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il 03/06/2012 15:20, David Kastrup ha scritto:
>
> Federico Bruni writes:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> can you tell me what's the "meaning" of a stem which connects a note
>>> in a voice to a rest (?) in another voice?
>>> See image at
Il 03/06/2012 15:20, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Federico Bruni writes:
Hi,
can you tell me what's the "meaning" of a stem which connects a note
in a voice to a rest (?) in another voice?
See image attached.
There is no rest to be seen. There are just two voices which share some
noteheads.
Federico Bruni writes:
> Hi,
>
> can you tell me what's the "meaning" of a stem which connects a note
> in a voice to a rest (?) in another voice?
> See image attached.
There is no rest to be seen. There are just two voices which share some
noteheads. Also there is one glissando between two no
Hi,
can you tell me what's the "meaning" of a stem which connects a note in
a voice to a rest (?) in another voice?
See image attached.
Is it good output? (I think it's been engraved in Finale)
If so, how can I get it in LilyPond?
Thanks,
Federico
<>___
19 matches
Mail list logo
