> My point was that it is impossible to play <e f>8 only on the 6th
> string of a guitar.
> But that should sound at the second quaver of the example following
> _exactly_ the notation of your example.
>
just another thought - if these notes have originally been written for
another instrument - let's say for a piano - and later it was transcribed:
does it not make sense sense to keep the original quarter (perhaps one could
parenthesize it…)? I believe the quarter rhythm is better marked with a
quarter note in analogy to the following quarters.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/stem-across-voices-tp33953167p33954604.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
