>> [...] after doing a grep over the git repository, which leads me to
>> `property-iterator.cc`, it's not really clear to me what's going
>> on...
>
> Well, you can find it in `define-event-classes.scm`. It's the event
> class for events created by `\override`s.
Ah, yes, I missed that while do
Le jeudi 16 février 2023 à 06:30 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> ```
>
> >> As can be seen, the acciaccatura neither has a slash nor a slur if
> >> quoted. [...]
> >
> > This looks like a real bug, please file an issue.
>
> [https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6531](https://gitlab.c
>> As can be seen, the acciaccatura neither has a slash nor a slur if
>> quoted. [...]
>
> This looks like a real bug, please file an issue.
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6531
> AFAICS, this works:
>
> ```
> \version "2.25.2"
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Score
> qu
Le mercredi 15 février 2023 à 19:34 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> ```
>
> Consider this example.
>
> ```
> fluteNotes = \relative {
> r2. c''4 |
> d8 \acciaccatura e c d e fis2 |
> g2 d |
> }
>
> oboeNotes = \relative c'' {
> R1 |
> \cueDuring "flute" #UP { R1 } |
> g2 d |
> }
>
Consider this example.
```
fluteNotes = \relative {
r2. c''4 |
d8 \acciaccatura e c d e fis2 |
g2 d |
}
oboeNotes = \relative c'' {
R1 |
\cueDuring "flute" #UP { R1 } |
g2 d |
}
\addQuote "flute" { \fluteNotes }
<<
\new Staff \fluteNotes
\new Staff \oboeNotes
>>
```
As can be
On 28/01/13 14:07, Garrett Fitzgerald wrote:
I'm having a problem with the beginning repeat sign of the following
code being repeated on each side of the acciaccatura.
This is an old bug (
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=34). You need to add
a grace note skip to the other
I'm having a problem with the beginning repeat sign of the following code
being repeated on each side of the acciaccatura. What am I doing weird?
Thanks.
\version "2.14.2"
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
\time 6/8
\transpose c des \relative c''' {
R2. |
\repeat volta 2 {
\acciaccat
On 27/08/12 23:45, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
Hello fabio,
you can use an override:
\relative c' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\acciaccatura d'8
}
That leaves any slurUp/slurDown/slurNeutral intact and changes
direction only for this particular slur.
Having to do this happens f
Il 27/08/2012 15:45, Jan-Peter Voigt ha scritto:
\relative c' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\acciaccatura d'8
}
That leaves any slurUp/slurDown/slurNeutral intact and changes direction
only for this particular slur.
More elegant solution :)
Fabio, it is explained here:
http://
Hello fabio,
you can use an override:
\relative c' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\acciaccatura d'8
}
That leaves any slurUp/slurDown/slurNeutral intact and changes direction
only for this particular slur.
HTH
Jan-Peter
On 27.08.2012 14:48, fabio gabbianelli wrote:
how can
Il 27/08/2012 14:48, fabio gabbianelli ha scritto:
how can i decide if the acciaccatura note is link to the higher or
the lower note of chord that follow? when i write acciaccatura to a
chord, in default mode, it link to the lower note
ps: i wish you can understand, i'm not good with english. if
how can i decide if the acciaccatura note is link to the higher or the lower
note of chord that follow? when i write acciaccatura to a chord, in default
mode, it link to the lower note
ps: i wish you can understand, i'm not good with english. if there's someone
italian i will be happy to speak
Am Samstag, 22. August 2009 10:51:45 schrieb Nick Payne:
> See the acciaccatura slurs in the attached png. I can't figure why the
> second of the slurs sits up above the stems, as there is nothing I am doing
> to make that happen.
That acciaccatura is the one one without a fingering digit. Withou
See the acciaccatura slurs in the attached png. I can't figure why the
second of the slurs sits up above the stems, as there is nothing I am doing
to make that happen. I tried to get a minimal example that shows the
problem, but when I excerpt the relevant source notes from the treble voice
(below)
Thanks for your answers,
About the voice beginning with a grace note, I have perhaps found a
workout that seems to work at least in this simple case. When a voice
begins with a grace note, use \beforeGrace in all voices as follows:
-
\version "2.11.42"
% if cadenza really never count for
2008/4/4 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2) If I remove the first d'8 note, the stem direction of the d note
> becomes up, as if the \once did not work well.
> >
> Ugly! Yet another problem with grace notes! Note that the problem remains
> the same even if you
> remove the \once \overrid
Papa Eric wrote:
Hi,
In the following code I cannot solve two problems:
-
\version "2.11.42"
{ \voiceTwo
d'8
\acciaccatura {\once \override Stem #'direction = #up c'8} d'8
\acciaccatura {\once \override Stem #'direction = #up c'8} d'8-.
}
\layout {
ragged-last = ##t
}
--
r = #'outside
d'8-.
}
Trevor D
- Original Message -
From: "Papa Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:11 AM
Subject: Problem with acciaccatura and articulation
Hi,
In the following code I cannot solve two problems:
-
\version &quo
Hi,
In the following code I cannot solve two problems:
-
\version "2.11.42"
{ \voiceTwo
d'8
\acciaccatura {\once \override Stem #'direction = #up c'8} d'8
\acciaccatura {\once \override Stem #'direction = #up c'8} d'8-.
}
\layout {
ragged-last = ##t
}
-
1) the first ac
Thank you very much!
I'm using version 2.6.3 because it is the version that goes with my kubuntu
6.06, but I'll see how to upgrade at my own.
Alberto Corella
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l
I just ran it with lily 2.8x and it does what you want it to. So maybe
upgrading will solve your problem.
Jay
> Hi!
> I've got a problem with an \acciaccatura. It doesn't work as expected (by
> me).
> I've read the docs and found something in 6.4.6 about a explicit context
> voice
> but, maybe f
Hi!
I've got a problem with an \acciaccatura. It doesn't work as expected (by me).
I've read the docs and found something in 6.4.6 about a explicit context voice
but, maybe for my low level english, I can't understand.
The acciccatura is merged with the tremolo instead of be printed before it.
How
Thanks. That solves the problem :)
Alberto
Graham Percival wrote:
On 11-May-05, at 2:20 PM, David Sanders wrote:
e8([ cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b)]
Try
e8[( cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b])
Since an \acc creates a slur, you can't have another slur happening
at the same time. Use a
On 11-May-05, at 2:20 PM, David Sanders wrote:
e8([ cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b)]
Try
e8[( cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b])
Since an \acc creates a slur, you can't have another slur happening
at the same time. Use a phrasing slur for your longer slur.
Cheers,
- Graham
_
> e8([ cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b)]
Try
e8[( cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b])
i.e. reverse the order of [ and ( and ] and )
(Don't have access to lily right now, but pretty sure that will do the
trick.)
David.
>
> and lilypond complains with
>
> diabeli.op149.22.ly:67:38: war
Hi!
I have a line like this:
e8([ cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b)]
and lilypond complains with
diabeli.op149.22.ly:67:38: warning: No slur to end:
e8([ cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-1 d8-2 b
)]
and the slur starting at the first e8 ends at
26 matches
Mail list logo
