Re: ottava & polyphony

2004-03-13 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Monday 08 March 2004 05:27, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > > On Thursday 04 March 2004 05:14, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > >>The question is what is the correct typesetting practice. > >>As a musician, how can I know if the ottava applies only to > >>the upper voice or to the f

Re: ottava & polyphony

2004-03-11 Thread GoochRules!
On Mar 3, 2004, at 6:25 PM, Roland Goretzki wrote: Hello list, hello Matthew, << { \skip 2. #(set-octavation 1) \acciaccatura cis' cis''4 \acciaccatura fis fis'2 #(set-octavation 0) } \\ { < fis, cis, >2.~ < fis, cis, >2. } >> Is it possible, that You made a typing error? Perhaps i

Re: ottava & polyphony

2004-03-11 Thread Mats Bengtsson
David Raleigh Arnold wrote: On Thursday 04 March 2004 05:14, Mats Bengtsson wrote: The question is what is the correct typesetting practice. As a musician, how can I know if the ottava applies only to the upper voice or to the full stave That's easy. It only applies to the voices that are mar

Re: ottava & polyphony

2004-03-10 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Thursday 04 March 2004 05:14, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > The question is what is the correct typesetting practice. > As a musician, how can I know if the ottava applies only to > the upper voice or to the full stave That's easy. It only applies to the voices that are marked. If you have 3 parts

Re: ottava & polyphony

2004-03-10 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 20:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Greetings, > > > > I am attempting to mix ottava brackets and polyphony. > > I have to following fragment: > > > > << { \skip 2. #(set-octavation 1) \acciaccatura cis' cis''4 > > \acciaccatura fis

Re: ottava & polyphony

2004-03-06 Thread Mats Bengtsson
The question is what is the correct typesetting practice. As a musician, how can I know if the ottava applies only to the upper voice or to the full stave (how would you notate it if it only applied to the lower voice for some weird reason)? Actually, this feature is described in the chapter on "St

Re: ottava & polyphony

2004-03-06 Thread Roland Goretzki
Hello list, hello Matthew, > << { \skip 2. #(set-octavation 1) \acciaccatura cis' cis''4 > \acciaccatura fis fis'2 #(set-octavation 0) } \\ { < fis, cis, >2.~ < > fis, cis, >2. } >> Is it possible, that You made a typing error? Perhaps it has to be: << { \skip 2. #(

ottava & polyphony

2004-03-06 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Greetings, > > I am attempting to mix ottava brackets and polyphony. > I have to following fragment: > > << { \skip 2. #(set-octavation 1) \acciaccatura cis' cis''4 > \acciaccatura fis fis'2 #(set-octavation 0) } \\ { < fis, cis, >2.~ < > fis, cis, >2.

ottava & polyphony

2004-03-03 Thread GoochRules!
Greetings, I am attempting to mix ottava brackets and polyphony. I have to following fragment: << { \skip 2. #(set-octavation 1) \acciaccatura cis' cis''4 \acciaccatura fis fis'2 #(set-octavation 0) } \\ { < fis, cis, >2.~ < fis, cis, >2. } >> I am finding that the lower (second) voice is bei