Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:21:17 -0500
> Von: David Raleigh Arnold
> An: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Betreff: Re: new chord symbol (for me, at least)
> Quick recognition is the whole purpose of chord names of this type.
True.
> C/e is mu
Hi David (et al.):
In sheet music convention there is no difference whatever between
Cdim and Cdim7. Many people like you and I like to include the 7
to be unambiguous, but nothing can be done about Cdim
except to write it as Cm(b5) if the triad is desired.
Though its usage is hardly widespr
On Monday 09 February 2009, Tao Cumplido wrote:
> Yes, that's true.
>
> Actually I prefer myself to write D#°7 for full diminished chords.
> For some people it seems illogical though that D#ø should
automatically represent a seventh-chord and D#° shouldn't.
>
> I just wanted to point out that th
rd, in this
> case D# F# A C
> >
> > Original-Nachricht
> >
> >> Datum: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:54:45 +0100
> >> Von: "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)"
> >> An: "James E. Bailey"
> >> CC: lilypond-use
+0100
Von: "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)"
An: "James E. Bailey"
CC: lilypond-user Mailinglist
Betreff: Re: new chord symbol (for me, at least)
It's ds:dim
(ds fs a triad, actually)
James E. Bailey wrote:
I don't do very much with chord symbols, an
> Betreff: Re: new chord symbol (for me, at least)
> It's ds:dim
>
> (ds fs a triad, actually)
>
>
>
> James E. Bailey wrote:
> > I don't do very much with chord symbols, and so I don't know what all
> > of them mean. I'm engraving so
