On 2021-12-12 1:53 am, Josiah Boothby wrote:
I used to know how to do this, I think, but...how do I adjust the stem
length in a metronome mark? Seems like I should be able to do something
like
\override MetronomeMark.stem-length = xyz
but that *specifically* doesn't appear to be avai
I used to know how to do this, I think, but...how do I adjust the stem
length in a metronome mark? Seems like I should be able to do something like
\override MetronomeMark.stem-length = xyz
but that *specifically* doesn't appear to be available.
Something involving .add-stem-length perhaps?
—J
Le 06/11/2021 à 14:47, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
[...]
Is there some gain to be had by considering the three related concepts —
“context pushing”, cross-staff items, and part-combining — together, to see
where a single mechanism might help all three? Put another (OOP-ish) way: Are
cross-staff
Hi Jean,
> In an ideal world of 'pushing' grobs, that would
> be written as something like
> ^\p
YES!!!
> but the \p should also be pushed or something
> should be done about it because of its direction.
For sure, there are potential complications…
> it's worth noting that the part combiner,
>
Le 05/11/2021 à 23:09, David Kastrup a écrit :
I think one change should be that cross-staff needs to be more than a
flag. It rather needs to be a pair of staves identified in some manner
where distancing of any staff pairs in that interval will not involve
the cross-staff material, but it other
I guess you tried \override MetronomeMark.Y-offset = ...?
Then \override Score.MetronomeMark.Y-offset works.
Akikazu
On 2021/11/06 8:43, Knute Snortum wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:56 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le 05/11/2021 à 18:06, Knute Snortum a écrit :
and 2) how do I adjust the metr
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:56 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> Le 05/11/2021 à 18:06, Knute Snortum a écrit :
> > and 2) how do I adjust the metronome
> > mark's height? Y-offset and Y-extent don't seem to change anything.
>
>
> I am not sure what you have tried exactly. The code
>\tweak Y-offset
Hi all,
> I think one change should be that cross-staff needs to be more than a
> flag. It rather needs to be a pair of staves identified in some manner
> where distancing of any staff pairs in that interval will not involve
> the cross-staff material, but it otherwise will contribute to the
> ou
>>\tempo "Allegro"
>>a'''16->-4( g f c a g f c a g f c \change Staff = "lower" a g f c) |
>> }
>>
>> leftHand = \relative {
>>\clef bass
>>f,1 |
>> }
>>
>> \new PianoStaff <<
>
\change Staff = "lower" a g f c) |
}
leftHand = \relative {
\clef bass
f,1 |
}
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "upper" \rightHand
\new Staff = "lower" \leftHand
%%%
(see attached picture)
The metronome mark is aligned too low and collides with the
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:30 PM Knute Snortum wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 10:06 AM Knute Snortum wrote:
> >
> > I think I have found a bug, or at least an "ugly" behavior. Consider
> > the following code:
>
> It looks like a similar thing happens with an ottava bracket:
It looks like I can
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 10:06 AM Knute Snortum wrote:
>
> I think I have found a bug, or at least an "ugly" behavior. Consider
> the following code:
It looks like a similar thing happens with an ottava bracket:
%%%
\version "2.22.1"
rightHand = \relative {
\ottava 1 a'''16->-4( g f c \ottava
Hand = \relative {
\clef bass
f,1 |
}
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "upper" \rightHand
\new Staff = "lower" \leftHand
>>
%%%
(see attached picture)
The metronome mark is aligned too low and collides with the accent
mark and the fingering number. Take out th
; I want to change the "=" to "~" or "ca." in a metronome mark but I can't see
>> how to do it. There's a 'stencil' property but I assume that refers to the
>> entire MM and not the equals sign. Can someone please help?
> You can use arb
On 28/09/2021 10:02:24, "Peter Toye" wrote:
>I want to change the "=" to "~" or "ca." in a metronome mark but I
>can't see how to do it. There's a 'stencil' property but I assume that
>refers to the entire MM and not the eq
I want to change the "=" to "~" or "ca." in a metronome mark but I can't see
how to do it. There's a 'stencil' property but I assume that refers to the
entire MM and not the equals sign. Can someone please help?
Thanks in advance
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
;
> Cc: lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond-user@gnu.org) u...@gnu.org>
> Subject: RE: metronome-mark-alignment
>
> When Metronome_mark_engraver is part of a Score or Staff context,
> MetronomeMarks that coincide with TimeSignatures align by default to the
> TimeSignature.
Am Mo., 20. Jan. 2020 um 23:52 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > Am Mi., 15. Jan. 2020 um 01:23 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
> >
> >> We need to put out the difference between # and $ even for beginners.
> >> Basically # can only be used for stuff where you can figure out
Thomas Morley writes:
> Am Mi., 15. Jan. 2020 um 01:23 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
>
>> We need to put out the difference between # and $ even for beginners.
>> Basically # can only be used for stuff where you can figure out the
>> meaning in context without even looking at the Scheme expression
Am Mi., 15. Jan. 2020 um 01:23 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > Am Di., 14. Jan. 2020 um 23:39 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
> >>
> >> Thomas Morley writes:
> >>
> >> > Am Mo., 13. Jan. 2020 um 07:14 Uhr schrieb Daniel Rosen
> >> > :
> >> >>
> >> >> > The hash mark # met
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2020-01-14 5:18 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
>> No, it's that \notes is identical to $notes (apart from the syntax) in
>> that it creates a copy. So whenever you write \something and do
>> something with it, whatever you do with it will not affect the original
>> stuff stored
On 2020-01-14 5:18 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
No, it's that \notes is identical to $notes (apart from the syntax) in
that it creates a copy. So whenever you write \something and do
something with it, whatever you do with it will not affect the original
stuff stored in the Scheme variable something
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2020-01-14 2:39 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Ok, let me try again.
>> # and $ differ in several respects. # inserts Scheme constructs in
>> places where LilyPond can decide how they fit into its syntax without
>> looking at their value first. In that case, evaluation of t
> -Original Message-
> From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 5:39 PM
> To: Thomas Morley
> Cc: Daniel Rosen ; lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond-
> u...@gnu.org) ; David Nalesnik
>
> Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignmen
Thomas Morley writes:
> Am Di., 14. Jan. 2020 um 23:39 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
>>
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>> > Am Mo., 13. Jan. 2020 um 07:14 Uhr schrieb Daniel Rosen
>> > :
>> >>
>> >> > The hash mark # method of embedding Scheme is a natural fit for this
>> >> > system.
>> >> > Once
On 2020-01-14 2:39 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
Ok, let me try again.
# and $ differ in several respects. # inserts Scheme constructs in
places where LilyPond can decide how they fit into its syntax without
looking at their value first. In that case, evaluation of those Scheme
expressions is done
Am Di., 14. Jan. 2020 um 23:39 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > Am Mo., 13. Jan. 2020 um 07:14 Uhr schrieb Daniel Rosen
> > :
> >>
> >> > The hash mark # method of embedding Scheme is a natural fit for this
> >> > system.
> >> > Once the lexer sees a hash mark, it call
Thomas Morley writes:
> Am Mo., 13. Jan. 2020 um 07:14 Uhr schrieb Daniel Rosen :
>>
>> > The hash mark # method of embedding Scheme is a natural fit for this
>> > system.
>> > Once the lexer sees a hash mark, it calls the Scheme reader to read one
>> > full Scheme
>> > expression (this can be
g List
> > (lilypond-user@gnu.org)
> > Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignment
> >
> > Though, I've already heard about difficulties about using scheme to write
> > own extension pretty often.
> > Just like you say:
> >
> > Am So., 12. Jan. 2020 um 22:19
> -Original Message-
> From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 7:35 AM
> To: Daniel Rosen
> Cc: Thomas Morley ; lilypond-user Mailing List
> (lilypond-user@gnu.org) ; David Nalesnik
>
> Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignment
Daniel Rosen writes:
> As far as the Extending manual goes, though... I could be wrong, but
> it seems to assume a basic working knowledge of how computer programs
> and programming languages work that I simply don't have. Going through
> it, I think to myself that I would need to have one-on-one
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Morley [mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2020 6:04 PM
> To: Daniel Rosen
> Cc: David Nalesnik ; lilypond-user Mailing List
> (lilypond-user@gnu.org)
> Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignment
>
>
Hi Daniel,
you may have heard there's a conference soon in Salzburg.
I will have a talk there as well, thus I doubt I can't look into the
problem you've reported before I'm back.
Nevertheless in alzburg I'll talk about user-defined extensions for LilyPond.
During the talk I'll frequently recommen
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Morley [mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 5:37 PM
> To: David Nalesnik
> Cc: Daniel Rosen ; lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond-
> u...@gnu.org)
> Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignment
>
>
(get-par parx))
(if(ly:grob? pary)
(get-par pary))
;; the inner function gets called from here
(let* ((result (get-par grob)))
;; check if we found something
(if (ly:grob? result)
result
#f)))
David N
On Saturday, January 11, 2020, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
>
> >> I have a new problem. If I take away the first instance of \music in
> each staff of my original example,
>
>
> > Whoops, meant to say *your* example with the revised function.
>
> >> the
On Jan 9, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
>> I have a new problem. If I take away the first instance of \music in each
>> staff of my original example,
> Whoops, meant to say *your* example with the revised function.
>> the file fails to compile, and I get this error message:
>>
>>> ~/
> my original example
Whoops, meant to say *your* example with the revised function.
DR
> Fantastic. A minor point though: while the example does compile as it should,
> I also get the following text in the log during the preprocessing stage:
>
> > Fontconfig warning: ignoring 1033: not a valid language tag
>
> It doesn't say it's an error or even a warning, but I've never seen it
> The problem is that ly:make-simple-closure has been removed. I replaced
> the old default with the new definition (found in the Internals Reference),
> and the function works again.
Fantastic. A minor point though: while the example does compile as it should, I
also get the following text in t
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 7:28 AM David Nalesnik wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:18 PM Daniel Rosen wrote:
> >
> > I just rediscovered David Nalesnik's metronome-mark-alignment function in
> > this thread that I originally started years ago
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:18 PM Daniel Rosen wrote:
>
> I just rediscovered David Nalesnik's metronome-mark-alignment function in
> this thread that I originally started years ago: https://bit.ly/2QUmi6H
I just rediscovered it too! Completely forgot I had done this.
&g
I just rediscovered David Nalesnik's metronome-mark-alignment function in this
thread that I originally started years ago: https://bit.ly/2QUmi6H
The function works fine as long as Metronome_mark_engraver only exists in the
Score context. However, if it's added to, say, a Staff co
Thanks a lot, Ben!
JM
> Le 30 oct. 2018 à 13:25, Ben a écrit :
>
> On 10/30/2018 8:21 AM, Jacques Menu wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> The LPNR states that:
>>
>> Combining a metronome mark and text will automatically place the
>> metronome mar
On 10/30/2018 8:21 AM, Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello folks,
The LPNR states that:
Combining a metronome mark and text will automatically place the
metronome mark within parentheses
Is there a way to remove those parentheses explicitly?
Thanks for your help!
JM
Hello,
You can
Hello folks,
The LPNR states that:
Combining a metronome mark and text will automatically place the
metronome mark within parentheses
Is there a way to remove those parentheses explicitly?
Thanks for your help!
JM
___
lilypond-user
2017-04-17 14:21 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
> Hi Simon,
>
> It's the signum function sgn of course,
Ofcourse.
> implemented in racket as sgn, but
> not in guile or the SRFI's with guile AFAIK.
Don't know racket, but it's not in guile, afaik.
> You could also say in Scheme:
>
> (define (sgn n)
>
Hi Simon,
It's the signum function sgn of course, implemented in racket as sgn, but
not in guile or the SRFI's with guile AFAIK.
You could also say in Scheme:
(define (sgn n)
(cond ((negative? n) -1)
((positive? n) 1)
(else 0)))
A dozen ways to implement, of course, Would be
Am 16.04.2017 um 19:29 schrieb Thomas Morley:
#(define (sign x)
(if (= x 0)
0
(if (< x 0) -1 1)))
I can hardly imagine that default guile or any SRFI doesn’t already
provide such a function – unfortunately I’m not well-versed enough to
know… Anyone?
Best, Simon
___
Thanks for the fix, but I think I'll wait for the next release.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2017-04-16 15:00 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2017-04-16 12:59 GMT+02:00 Robert Murdoch :
>> When I adjust my score's size with #(layout-set-staff-size N) and the score
>> has a tempo with a metronome mark, the metronome mark's stem gets longer if
>> the size is smal
2017-04-16 12:59 GMT+02:00 Robert Murdoch :
> When I adjust my score's size with #(layout-set-staff-size N) and the score
> has a tempo with a metronome mark, the metronome mark's stem gets longer if
> the size is smaller, and shorter if the size is larger. There should be
>
When I adjust my score's size with #(layout-set-staff-size N) and the
score has a tempo with a metronome mark, the metronome mark's stem gets
longer if the size is smaller, and shorter if the size is larger. There
should be examples attached at sizes 20 and 12 to show you.
The q
Hi,
How can I change flag in metronome mark? Unfortunately *\override
Flag.stencil = #old-straight-flag* doesn't work. It seems that there is no
simple answer to that question.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/How-can-I-change-flag-in-metronome
On 11 oct. 2012, at 21:54, Henning Plumeyer wrote:
> How can I achive that the rehearsal mark is below the metronome mark
> "Allegro ma non troppo" (between the numbers for the FullBarRests)?
>
> This is what I tried:
>
> \version "2.16.0"
> {
> \
How can I achive that the rehearsal mark is below the metronome mark
"Allegro ma non troppo" (between the numbers for the FullBarRests)?
This is what I tried:
\version "2.16.0"
{
\once \override MetronomeMark #'outside-staff-priority = #1
\tempo "
Nick Payne wrote Monday, September 27, 2010 9:25 AM
If I hide the metronome mark with \override Score.MetronomeMark
#'stencil = ##f, the console output contains:
Preprocessing graphical objects...
programming error: cannot align on self: empty element
continuing, cross fingers
progra
If I hide the metronome mark with \override Score.MetronomeMark
#'stencil = ##f, the console output contains:
Preprocessing graphical objects...
programming error: cannot align on self: empty element
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: cannot align on self: empty element
conti
Is posible tweak the metronome mark style?
using markups in the tempo definition allows you to put virtually anything
you want in the metronome mark.
the Notation Reference is your biggest friend. see "1.6.3 Writing parts"
and "1.8.2 Formatting text".
Hi:
Is posible tweak the metronome mark style? Many scores I have looked didn't
have parentheses between the tempo. Also I want to make something like this:
Allegro, M.M. = (quarter) 108 - 110
Thanks.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond
On 21 August 2010 17:15, Akira wrote:
>
> Here is a picture in which metronome mark is moved above rehearsal
> mark.
>
> Lilypond is clever enough to avoid crashes, but not wise enough to
> normally layout object horizontally.
> I want the layout shown in picture.
> Coul
AM, Akira wrote:
> Here is a picture in which metronome mark is moved above rehearsal mark.
>
> Lilypond is clever enough to avoid crashes, but not wise enough to
> normally layout object horizontally.
> I want the layout shown in picture.
> Coul
Here is a picture in which metronome mark is moved above rehearsal mark.
Lilypond is clever enough to avoid crashes, but not wise enough to
normally layout object horizontally.
I want the layout shown in picture.
Could you please tell me how to do it
So, I've been thinking about this, would the easiest way to create a
metronome mark that's barline aligned that plays back in midi be to:
• left-align the rehearsal mark with \override Score.RehearsalMark
#'self-alignment-X = #-1
• create a manual metronome mark using th
Hello,
2009/8/28 Nikolay Kirov
> Hello all!
>
> I'd like to produce tie in metronome mark:
>
> \tempo 8 \tie 8. = 80 (does not work)
>
> \tempo 8~8. = 80 (does not work)
>
> e8^\markup { \smaller \note #"8" #1 ~ \smaller \note #"8.&qu
Hello all!
I'd like to produce tie in metronome mark:
\tempo 8 \tie 8. = 80 (does not work)
\tempo 8~8. = 80 (does not work)
e8^\markup { \smaller \note #"8" #1 ~ \smaller \note #"8." #1 = 80 }
(does not work)
Any suggestions?
Nikolay K.
--
Nikolay Kirov Kir
Hi Jethro,
> As the subjoined code obviously isn't working, how exactly would you code
> this
> in a correct manner?
>
>\tempo "Grave, solemn." 2 = 54-56
As already mentioned you have to use a markup command. The following markup
should match the look of the \tempo command:
\mark \markup \n
Am 19.01.2009 um 20:27 schrieb J. Van Thuyne:
As the subjoined code obviously isn't working, how exactly would
you code this
in a correct manner?
\tempo "Grave, solemn." 2 = 54-56
I presume this property will only accept numbers, not a minus sign.
How can it
be overridden?
Best regar
As the subjoined code obviously isn't working, how exactly would you code this
in a correct manner?
\tempo "Grave, solemn." 2 = 54-56
I presume this property will only accept numbers, not a minus sign. How can it
be overridden?
Best regards,
Jethro.
___
Ok, fine.
libero
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> staff.itely (the file containing metronome mark docs) is still
> unfinished. Please wait a few weeks; if the first public draft
> does not contain good docs about this, please speak up ag
staff.itely (the file containing metronome mark docs) is still
unfinished. Please wait a few weeks; if the first public draft
does not contain good docs about this, please speak up again.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 20:13:28 +0200
"Libero Mureddu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Hi Neil,
thanks for your answer,
I'm just wondering if the manual section about metronome marks should
be changed in order to inform that ATM one should use a mixture of
\mark \markup and \tempo, depending on the context: in my memory when
someone (myself and other people I saw) starts a notation
2008/7/4 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Since these metronome marks look very strange at the beginning of a piece, I
> looked at the code and tried copying over staff from RehearsalMark (which
> actually uses the break-align-symbols, defined in scm/define-grobs.scm), but
> all I got was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2008 schrieb Neil Puttock:
> Hi Libero,
>
> 2008/7/4 Libero Mureddu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have two questions:
> >
> > Is there a way to have the \tempo or a custom \mark \markup that
> > behaves correctly according to those thr
Hi Libero,
2008/7/4 Libero Mureddu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have two questions:
>
> Is there a way to have the \tempo or a custom \mark \markup that
> behaves correctly according to those three different situations?
I don't think so; unless you use both as required by each individual
situation,
> 1) if there's a time signature, the tempo should be left aligned with it,
> However, in 1) the "A" of "Allegro" is aligned with the center of the
> time signature, not left-aligned.
Durand edition, seems the only one that I know that center-align with
the time signature. However, they do center
2008/7/4 Libero Mureddu:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to play a bit with the metronome mark and the \mark \markup
> commands in order to have a unified way to set the tempo in my scores,
> but I'm a bit lost:
> the three rules I know for that are:
> 1) if there's a time si
Hi,
I'm trying to play a bit with the metronome mark and the \mark \markup
commands in order to have a unified way to set the tempo in my scores,
but I'm a bit lost:
the three rules I know for that are:
1) if there's a time signature, the tempo should be left aligned with it,
2) if
fore the first note.
>
>/Mats
>
> René Brandenburger wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > is there a way to get the metronome mark not to interfere with note
> > spacing?
> > if I remove the metronome mark in the following snippet, all eight notes
> > are spaced e
Just add
\override Score.MetronomeMark #'extra-spacing-width = #'(+inf.0 . -inf.0)
before the first note.
/Mats
René Brandenburger wrote:
Hello,
is there a way to get the metronome mark not to interfere with note
spacing?
if I remove the metronome mark in the following snippet,
Hello,
is there a way to get the metronome mark not to interfere with note
spacing?
if I remove the metronome mark in the following snippet, all eight notes
are spaced evenly, with the metronome mark, the space between the first
and the second note is much larger.
thanks
rene
8< --- SNIP
Hi Markus:
so I used Kieren's example as a starting point...
I put my result in the LSR (Rhythm marks / play style indication):
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=204
Have fun!
Very cool, thank you. :)
After looking at Kieren's example I cobbled together the following
solution. It's quite
Hi all,
so I used Kieren's example as a starting point...
I put my result in the LSR (Rhythm marks / play style indication):
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=204
Have fun!
Markus
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists
Hi, y'all --
How 'bout the attached as a starting point?
Best,
Kieren.
\version "2.9.13"
\layout
{
ragged-right = ##t
}
metMark = \mark \markup
{
\line \vcenter
{
"Swing"
\hspace #0.5
\score
did get the desired result.- Original Message From: Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Dave Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.orgSent: Wednesday, 26 July, 2006 5:42:24 AMSubject: Re: a metronome mark questionDave Phillips wrote:> Greetings:>> I've writ
Dave Phillips wrote:
Greetings:
I've written a part in even eight notes, but I want to indicate in
the metronome marking that the rhythm of the even eighths should be
played with a swing rhythm, i.e. an eighth-note triplet with a quarter
note followed by an eighth. In a score the rhythm woul
Dave Phillips wrote:
Greetings:
I've written a part in even eight notes, but I want to indicate in
the metronome marking that the rhythm of the even eighths should be
played with a swing rhythm, i.e. an eighth-note triplet with a quarter
note followed by an eighth. In a score the rhythm woul
Greetings:
I've written a part in even eight notes, but I want to indicate in the
metronome marking that the rhythm of the even eighths should be played
with a swing rhythm, i.e. an eighth-note triplet with a quarter note
followed by an eighth. In a score the rhythm would be {\times 2/3 {c'4
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 03.27, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
> from metronome-marking.ly in
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/input/regression/out-www/collated-files.ht
>ml
>
> Here \tempo directives are printed as metronome markings.
> The marking is left aligned with the time signature
from metronome-marking.ly in
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/input/regression/out-www/collated-files.html
Here \tempo directives are printed as metronome markings.
The marking is left aligned with the time signature, if there is one.
[image of music]
But it is not left a
Good!
I have the 2.2.4 working and with metronome marks. Thank you all.
By the way, I just want to share one little experience: Lilypond, via
etf2ly, is compatible with Ircam's Openmusic, the lisp-based software
for computer-assisted composition; in Openmusic there's a module called
"Voice" that
On Aug 6, 2004, at 7:19 AM, Libero Mureddu wrote:
Il giorno 06/ago/04, alle 11:21, Mats Bengtsson ha scritto:
Unfortunately, you have found a bug that was introduced in version
2.2.5. If you have the possibility to install version 2.2.4 the
metronome markings should work correctly. I will send a bu
In general, I wouldn't expect a development version to be as stable as
the "stable" one, even though you have managed to find one example
of the opposite. There have been quite some changes in 2.3.x related
to the paper layout handling and some changes to the input syntax, but
convert-ly should tak
Unfortunately, it seems that via fink is not possible to install the
previous version, fink doesn't find the 2.2.4. Do you think that the
unstable version is stable enough at the moment? I'm not so expert to
valuate this.
Thank you
Libero
Il giorno 06/ago/04, alle 11:21, Mats Bengtsson ha scrit
Unfortunately, you have found a bug that was introduced in version
2.2.5. If you have the possibility to install version 2.2.4 the
metronome markings should work correctly. I will send a bug report.
/Mats
Libero Mureddu wrote:
Hi!
Can you help me to understand why the metronome marking doesn't a
ook g3 800
mac os 10.3.4
lilypond 2.2.5
piano = {
\context Staff = upper \with {
fontSize = #-2
\override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -2)
Have you tried commenting out these lines? It's just possible that the
fontSize is messing up the metronome mark.
Hi!
Can you help me to understand why the metronome marking doesn't appear
in the following example?
I'm quite sure that I'm missing something very simple, but I can't
solve this.
I'm putting \tempo everywhere with no results.
Libero Mureddu
P.S. Thanks to Mats for the staff size solution!
Ibook
Hi, I just put in a MM and the note was huge way out of porportion to
the notes in the score and the paper size.
Must I do something special to fix this???
In most printed music with a MM it is usually quite small
Thanks
Aaron
___
Lilypond-user ma
You have to specify the tempo together with the music of the
stave where you want it to appear. If you go to the on-line
version of the manual and read the section on Metronome marks
you can click on the example to see the corresponding input
.ly file to see exactly how to do it.
/Mats
Darren Ne
I'm using Lilypond 1.8.1 on RedHat 9. I'm very pleased with it overall.
I have an orchestral score that includes all the parts files.
In the score ly file, in my paper { } section, I'm putting a metronome
marking like so, but it's not showing up. Am I doing something wrong? (The
midi marking pic
100 matches
Mail list logo
