Re: Define nr of measures per system

ys of accomplishing what you want, each with pros and cons depending on exactly what functionality and flexibility you want. For a constant number of measures per system, my favourite is David K's \bar-keeper, which I’ve shown in the snippet below. (Aside: I’m not sure why this isn’t in the main

Re: Define nr of measures per system

Am 07.03.2018 um 08:02 schrieb Brian Barker: At 18:16 06/03/2018 +0100, Omri Abram wrote: Another beginner question, but can't seem to find the answer in the documentation: is it possible to define a constant number of measures per staff system? The Notation Reference (at 4.3.1) suggests:

Re: Define nr of measures per system

At 18:16 06/03/2018 +0100, Omri Abram wrote: Another beginner question, but can't seem to find the answer in the documentation: is it possible to define a constant number of measures per staff system? The Notation Reference (at 4.3.1) suggests: For line breaks at regular intervals use \break

Re: Define nr of measures per system

pros and cons depending on exactly what functionality and flexibility you want. For a constant number of measures per system, my favourite is David K's \bar-keeper, which I’ve shown in the snippet below. (Aside: I’m not sure why this isn’t in the main base code… Given that David K coded it,

Define nr of measures per system

Hello, Thank you for the helpful answers to my previous question! Another beginner question, but can't seem to find the answer in the documentation: is it possible to define a constant number of measures per staff system? Cheers! -- omriabram.com __

Re: measures per system

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:09 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi all, > > Kieren's use of this engraver with a "real-world" example has alerted me > to a problem with it--namely, that it doesn't accommodate instances where > the user sets the starting bar number. > > I've attached a fix. > > Arghh!!

Re: measures per system

Hi all, Kieren's use of this engraver with a "real-world" example has alerted me to a problem with it--namely, that it doesn't accommodate instances where the user sets the starting bar number. I've attached a fix. Best, David bars per line systems per page engraver.ly Description: Binary data

Re: measures per system

doing this, which should hopefully do everything that the individual engravers do. So, if you want to control just measures per system then write a layout block like this: \layout { \context { \Staff \consists #(bars-per-line-systems-per-page-engraver '(4)) } } This will create a layo

Re: measures per system

Hi David, > Attached you'll find a engraver which seems to work. Thanks! > and... > if you didn't account for all the bars in the score, LilyPond should > revert to normal line-breaking and pagination for the remaining > measures. Excellent! > Shortcut--well, maybe not, but more user-friendly:

Re: measures per system

Hi Kieren, On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi David, > >> In the interests of making the user interface friendlier, I added a >> feature for specifying repeats. You can now write something like this: >> \consists #(bars-per-line-engraver '(5 7*5 1 3*3)) > > Love it! T

Re: measures per system

Hi David, > In the interests of making the user interface friendlier, I added a > feature for specifying repeats. You can now write something like this: > \consists #(bars-per-line-engraver '(5 7*5 1 3*3)) Love it! Thanks. Is there an easy way of making an systems-per-page-engraver along the s

Re: measures per system

Hi Kieren, On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:20 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: [...] > I could change the engraver so that you could specify the list in your > example like so: > > '(4 5 4 6 (200) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 (100)) > > with the meaning that elements in further parentheses have > 'line-break-per

Re: measures per system

Hi Kieren, > On 2012-Nov-26, at 12:34, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> One of my favourite snippets (thanks David!) is >> I'm glad you like it! >> >> Is there a way that this can be coded "arbitrarily", e.g. >> >> 1. The first 19 measures

Re: measures per system

p.s. I guess in my exact example as given, one could use '(4 5 4 6 200 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100) But I think there is still a valid question in here [somewhere] about how to give the greatest flexibility to this [wonderful!] Scheme engraver, with the simplest user interface. Thanks! Kieren.

measures per system

Hi all, One of my favourite snippets (thanks David!) is Is there a way that this can be coded "arbitrarily", e.g. 1. The first 19 measures broken as '(4 5 4 6). 2. The next 200 measures broken automagically by Lilypond. 3. The next 32 measures broken

Re: minimum number of measures per system

- Original Message - From: "Benjamin Peterson" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:30 AM Subject: minimum number of measures per system Hi, Is there a way to force a minimum number of measures per system to be layed out? min-systems-per-page in a \paper block -- P

minimum number of measures per system

Hi, Is there a way to force a minimum number of measures per system to be layed out? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Forced # of measures per system?

Thanks for the help. The only problem I have now is that this causes an empty staff to show up for the \repeat section. How do I get rid of this and still retain the number of measures per system that I want? Thanks, Carl On Jan 12, 2004, at 2:14 PM, Erik Sandberg wrote: On Monday 12 January

Re: Forced # of measures per system?

Hello, Carl: How do you force lilypond to use a certain number of measures per system? Basically, you "superimpose" the break rules on the existing music, using \simultaneous, the short-hand << >>, or some other method -- here's one example from the online docs:

Re: Forced # of measures per system?

On Monday 12 January 2004 22.44, Carl Youngblood wrote: > Thanks for the help. The only problem I have now is that this causes an > empty staff to show up for the \repeat section. How do I get rid of > this and still retain the number of measures per system that I want? > Put it into

Forced # of measures per system?

How do you force lilypond to use a certain number of measures per system? Thanks, Carl Youngblood smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user