tisimst gmail.com> writes:
>
> Kieren MacMillan wrote
> > Any hints, for example, on what ‘ratio' actually does, or
[..]
> effect of "ratio". Seems like a "bug" to me that increasing "ratio" >
doesn't
> change the shape of the tie curve very much if the tie is at its
> "height-limit", but maybe
Trevor,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
>
> tisimst wrote Wednesday, December 31, 2014 5:09 PM
>
> > I took a look into the source code and here's what it says about each of
> the
> > "details" properties (found in 2.19.15 "lily/tie.cc" with the default
> values
> > found
tisimst wrote Wednesday, December 31, 2014 5:09 PM
> I took a look into the source code and here's what it says about each of the
> "details" properties (found in 2.19.15 "lily/tie.cc" with the default values
> found on IR web page and in "define-grobs.scm"):
>
[snip]
>
> It certainly does say t
Abraham,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:47 AM, tisimst
wrote:
> tisimst wrote
> > I took a look into the source code and here's what it says about each of
> > the "details" properties (found in 2.19.15 "lily/tie.cc" with the default
> > values found on IR web page and in "define-grobs.scm"):
>
> Hmm
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:59 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Hi Abraham,
>
>
> Is the documentation in the NR not being derived from the doc string of
> the interface?
>
>
Sorry, I mean "IR".
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lis
Hi Abraham,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:09 AM, tisimst
wrote:
>
>
> It certainly does say that these are supposed to be visible in the IR, but
> why aren't they? What can we do to get things like this there? I'm happy to
> assist if I can be given some direction...
>
I'm a little mystified at wh
: 1.0
- staff-line-collision-penalty: 5.0
- dot-collision-clearance: 0.25
- dot-collision-penalty: 0.25
- tie-column-monotonicity-penalty: 100
- skyline-padding: 0.05
-----------
-Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069
HTH,
Abraham
P.S.
Developers,
It certainly does say that these are supposed to be visible in the IR, but
why aren't they? What can we do to get things like this there? I'm happy to
assist if I can be given some direction...
--
View this mes
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> See the following :
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> \paper {
> paper-width = 100
> paper-height = 50
> ragged-right = ##f
> indent = 0
> tagline = ##f
> }
>
> { a'1
Hi David,
See the following :
\version "2.19.15"
\paper {
paper-width = 100
paper-height = 50
ragged-right = ##f
indent = 0
tagline = ##f
}
{ a'1 -\tweak thickness #.5 ^(-\tweak stencil ##f ^~ a') }
{ \tieUp a'1 -\tweak thickness #.5 ~ a' }
Slur is naturally slightly mor "parapolic"
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kieren,
>
> Here's a bad one :
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> \paper {
> paper-width = 100
> paper-height = 30
> ragged-right = ##f
> indent = 0
> tagline = ##f
> }
>
> { a'1 -
Hi Kieren,
Here's a bad one :
\version "2.19.15"
\paper {
paper-width = 100
paper-height = 30
ragged-right = ##f
indent = 0
tagline = ##f
}
{ a'1 -\tweak thickness #.5 ^(-\tweak stencil ##f ^~ a') }
happy new year !!
Pierre
2014-12-31 16:35 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik :
> Kieren,
>
>
Kieren,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > I think that you should investigate the numerous properties listed under
> details (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/internals/tie) for
> finding the basic shape.
>
> I t
Hi David,
> I think that you should investigate the numerous properties listed under
> details (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/internals/tie) for
> finding the basic shape.
I tried that… Unfortunately, it says “More information on the allowed
parameters for a grob can be found by
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>>
>>
>> Without trying it out I'd expect Janek's \shapeII (in openlilylib) and
>> using it with polar coordinates should help you.
>>
>>
> But then you'd lose the use of the function f
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 31.12.2014 um 15:26 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I’m putting together a stylesheet based on mid-20th-Century
>> Warner-Chappell musical theatre vocal books, and would like to mimic
>> more closely their tie shape:
>>
>>
>>
Am 31.12.2014 um 15:26 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hello all,
I’m putting together a stylesheet based on mid-20th-Century
Warner-Chappell musical theatre vocal books, and would like to mimic
more closely their tie shape:
As you can see, it’s nearly “parabolic" (i.e., the curve doesn’t really
inc
Have you trying the \shape command?
\version "2.19.15"
\relative c'' {
\shape #'((0 . 0.2) (1.5 . 1) (0 . 0) (0 . 0.2)) Tie
a1 ^~ | a1
}
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I’m putting togethe
Hello all,
I’m putting together a stylesheet based on mid-20th-Century Warner-Chappell
musical theatre vocal books, and would like to mimic more closely their tie
shape:
As you can see, it’s nearly “parabolic" (i.e., the curve doesn’t really
increase dramatically near the noteheads) and non
19 matches
Mail list logo
