Jonathan Kulp wrote:
On 20.12.2009, at 17:45, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Hi,
Is there an (easy) way to have both lilypond 2.12.x (stable)
and lilypond 2.13.x (devel.) installed and useable on my
system ? I'm always curious to try and test the latest
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
On 20.12.2009, at 17:45, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Is there an (easy) way to have both lilypond 2.12.x
(stable) and lilypond 2.13.x (devel.) installed and
useable on my system ? I'm always curious to try and test
I added a section a
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:00 AM, James Bailey
wrote:
> I don't know about linux, but on macintosh, there's absolutely zero
> problem, the binaries are all self-contained. It's just a matter of calling
> the right one.
>
>
> On 20.12.2009, at 17:45, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is the
I don't know about linux, but on macintosh, there's absolutely zero
problem, the binaries are all self-contained. It's just a matter of
calling the right one.
On 20.12.2009, at 17:45, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Hi,
Is there an (easy) way to have both lilypond 2.12.x (stable) and
lilypond
Hi,
Is there an (easy) way to have both lilypond 2.12.x (stable) and lilypond
2.13.x (devel.) installed and useable on my system ? I'm always curious to
try and test the latest features and bugfixes, but for distribution and
sharing of lilypond sourcecode it is probably a better idea to use t
