Tim Reeves wrote:
I don't think that lily 2.8 was supposed to do this; it was a fortunate
bug.
Why should *being able* to do something that ones wants to do (as long as
it isn't harmful in some way) be considered a bug?
He wasn't _telling_ lilypond to do it, and lilypond wasn't _deciding_ to
> 2. In lilypond version 2.8 and earlier it was possible to notate as I'm
>wanting, so the newest lilypond version is a regress compared with
>earlier versions, and I'm insisting, that this is a bug.
I don't think that lily 2.8 was supposed to do this; it was a fortunate
bug.
Why should
