Tim Reeves wrote:
I don't think that lily 2.8 was supposed to do this; it was a fortunate
bug.
Why should *being able* to do something that ones wants to do (as long as
it isn't harmful in some way) be considered a bug?
He wasn't _telling_ lilypond to do it, and lilypond wasn't _deciding_ to
do it. There was just a coincidence that it produced the result he
wanted. It was an accident.
Here's an example: pull one card from a deck of cards. The chance of
getting that particular card is 1/52. Now stick that card back in the
deck, shuffle it, and pull out another card. Don't complain if you
don't get the same card as you did the first time.
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
