Dear lilypond-users,
I have troubles with showing and hiding staves.
I tried:
zeigsmir = {
\set Staff.keepAliveInterfaces = #'(
rhythmic-grob-interface
multi-measure-rest-interface
lyric-interface
stanza-number-interface
percent-repeat-interface)
}
wegdamit = \
Hi Robert,
I'm afraid I don't really understand your problem, but
if you don't want barlines I recommend to you that you
simply use ChoirStaff instead of StaffGroup.
Sorry if that doesn't help.
Happy New Year!
Zoltán
___
lilypond-user mailing
Dear all,
I have the following problem:
When hiding staves via "\RemoveEmptyStaffContext" I
get unwanted barlines between the Lyrics.
Please find below a (somehow) minimal example where
the problem can be seen in the second line.
Thanks for any hints or solutions,
Rober
Perfect. Excellent trick.
Thanks,
Toine
> One trick that should solve your problem is to include transparent
> notes in one of the staves:
>
> \score {
> \new StaffGroup <<
> \new Staff <<
> \new Voice \partA
> \new Voice {\hideNotes \repeat unfold 60 { c'1 } }
>
One trick that should solve your problem is to include transparent
notes in one of the staves:
\score {
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff <<
\new Voice \partA
\new Voice {\hideNotes \repeat unfold 60 { c'1 } }
>>
\new Staff \partB
>>
}
/Mats
Toine Schreurs
Toine Schreurs wrote:
From an orchestral score I want to create a score of the percussion
instruments only. Now percussionists are used to large numbers of rests.
\RemoveEmptyStaffContext is very usefull in leaving out staves with
no musical content.
But if all of the staves in one system only c
Gilles wrote:
> > But if all of the staves in one system only contain rests, the whole system
> > disappears. It would be nice to leave at least one staff visible.
> >
>
> Maybe it is:
>
> \set Score.skipBars = ##t
>
That would circumvent the problem of my example. The result
will be only on
Graham Percival wrote:
> Which staff should remain visible, though? (ie Staff.instrument name)
That's arbitrary. There are no notes, only rests, rehearsel signs,
tempi, time changes and these are all the same for the various parts.
> I think it's easier to use "s1" (possibly in conjunction with
Hi.
> But if all of the staves in one system only contain rests, the whole system
> disappears. It would be nice to leave at least one staff visible.
>
Maybe it is:
\set Score.skipBars = ##t
that you really want.
Best,
Gilles
___
lilypond-user
On 25-Jan-06, at 7:48 AM, Toine Schreurs wrote:
From an orchestral score I want to create a score of the percussion
instruments only. Now percussionists are used to large numbers of
rests.
\RemoveEmptyStaffContext is very usefull in leaving out staves with
no musical content.
But if all of th
>From an orchestral score I want to create a score of the percussion
instruments only. Now percussionists are used to large numbers of rests.
\RemoveEmptyStaffContext is very usefull in leaving out staves with
no musical content.
But if all of the staves in one system only contain rests, the whole
Sorry... I should have search the ML first.
It's the exact same problem as:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-04/msg9.html
I'd like to second that feature request (including showing R4 as r4,
when not hidden).
Peter
___
lilypon
Hi,
I'm trying to perfect a score, and I like that I can hide empty staffs
with \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext }
This works fine when I use multimeasure rests like:
R1*16
But since the piece I have starts with
\partial 4*3
It therefore ends with a partial measure with on a
r4
This "r4"
13 matches
Mail list logo
