Do you have anybody who can help me via the telephone, please?
I'm new round here, but this sounds unlikely :)
I can't figure out how to install 2.6.0 from the internet or any other
wayit's tooo complicated.
It would help if you mention what computer and operating system you're
using.
I can't figure out how to install 2.6.0 from the internet or any other
wayit's tooo complicated. Do you have anybody who can help me via the
telephone, please?
Thanks
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
What happens if you click on the Cygwin icon (or start menu item)
to start a command window and then type the command
lilypond
in it?
If it says something like "Command not found", you have not managed
to select the lilypond package when you ran setup.exe.
When you have clicked on Next a number of
Hello,
I have already downloaded LilyPond twice, following the instructions to the
letter, but the installation does not work. There is no test.log file to send
you so I send you two other ones that may have information. Quite frankly, I
don't see how my computer could launch test.ly since it d
Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So what's the dpkg/apt for "Tell me what package this file that seems
> to be missing is in?" The solution I found was the package search on
> the debian site.
Most convenient is grep Contents-.gz; however, if apt fails to
install a dependency, a visit
> "Michael" == Michael J McGonagle writes:
>> urpmf libintl.so.1
>>
>> and it will tell you what package provides that file (the answer I get
>> here is libintl1).
Michael> Comes back with nothing for me...
That's because your database is hosed. Try installing libintl
> "Jan" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> The good thing is, that if you're missing a dependency, you can be
Jan> sure that the missing package is in the archive too; you don't have to
Jan> go googling the internet for it.
So what's the dpkg/apt for "Tell me w
Bob Schmertz wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >
> > blauw:~/usr/src/releases$ locate libintl
> > ...
> > blauw:~/usr/src/releases$ rpm -qf /usr/include/libintl.h
> > glibc-devel-2.2.4-19.3
>
> Yes, I get about the same thing, but the "missing" file w
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > Odd, this file is nowhere to be found on my Red Hat 7.1 system, but
> > LilyPond works fine. However, I installed it from source, so I can't tell
> > you too much about how to install from RPM.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Odd, this file is nowhere to be found on my Red Hat 7.1 system, but
> LilyPond works fine. However, I installed it from source, so I can't tell
> you too much about how to install from RPM.
blauw:~/usr/src/releases$ locate libintl
...
blauw:~/usr/src/releases$ rpm
Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had that idea too. I agree that the Debian package manager
> probably works better than the RPM stuff (not rpm itself, but urpmi
> and the graphical version).
Maybe it does, maybe not, it depends on what you want. dpkg and rpm
are both fine pkg man
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 12:25:59AM -0600, Michael J McGonagle wrote:
> Bob Schmertz wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 09:18:48AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > >
> > > > --> The rpm database cannot be opened in db3 format.
> > > > If you have just upgraded the rpm package you need t
Laura Conrad wrote:
>
> > "Michael" == Michael J McGonagle writes:
>
> Michael> Laura, I tried you suggestion of 'rpm -Uvh
> Michael> lilypond-1.4.2-1mdk.i586.rpm' and it tells me that there
> Michael> is a missing package of 'libintl.so.1'. So, now there is
> Michael> a new
Bob Schmertz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 09:18:48AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> >
> > > --> The rpm database cannot be opened in db3 format.
> > > If you have just upgraded the rpm package you need to convert
> > > your database to db3 format by running "rpm --rebuilddb" as r
> "Michael" == Michael J McGonagle writes:
Michael> Laura, I tried you suggestion of 'rpm -Uvh
Michael> lilypond-1.4.2-1mdk.i586.rpm' and it tells me that there
Michael> is a missing package of 'libintl.so.1'. So, now there is
Michael> a new wrinkle.
OK, say:
urpmf
Laura Conrad wrote:
>
Hello Laura, Jan, and Han-Wen;
I really appreciate your help here. I just wonder if my system has been
compromised in someway (ie beyond repair). When I tried to install
'guile' from the sources it errored out due to a conflicting definition
of what looks like a function c
> "Michael" == Michael J McGonagle writes:
Michael> I believe that Mandrake 8.0 is based on Redhat 7.x. I
Michael> don't know how Mandrake got one version number
Michael> ahead. While I am sure there are other differences,
Michael> someone mentioned that the only real differe
> "Michael" == Michael J McGonagle writes:
Michael> I still think if I am going to change/upgrade my
Michael> distribution, I will move to Debian.
I had that idea too. I agree that the Debian package manager
probably works better than the RPM stuff (not rpm itself, but urpmi
and
> "Michael" == Michael J McGonagle writes:
Michael> Laura Conrad wrote:
>>
>> I'm not much of a developer, but I do run Mandrake. I usually compile
>> my own lily, though.
Michael> Laura, could you give me a little background!
Michael> What version of Mandrake?
C
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > This turns out to have been a mistake; there are serious problems with
> > the printing system in 8.1, so if I were you I'd either do the 8.2
> > beta, or wait until 8.2 comes out officially. I seem to have fixed my
> > problems with the
Laura Conrad wrote:
>
> > "Jan" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I tried this one and I ran 'rpm -i lilypond-1.4.2-1mdk.i586.rpm' got the
> >> following:
> >>
> >> cannot open Packages index using db3 - Permission denied (13)
>
> Jan> Hmm, so it se
Laura Conrad wrote:
>
> I'm not much of a developer, but I do run Mandrake. I usually compile
> my own lily, though.
Laura, could you give me a little background!
What version of Mandrake?
Did you have to install 'guile'?
Are you using 'rpm' to do the install? Or are you unpacking the archiv
Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jan> Ah, ok, thanks. None of the developers runs Mandrake, that I know
> Jan> of...
>
> I'm not much of a developer, but I do run Mandrake.
Sorry, I didn't know that! I just assumed that Mandrake-using
lilyponders might have caught that stal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This turns out to have been a mistake; there are serious problems with
> the printing system in 8.1, so if I were you I'd either do the 8.2
> beta, or wait until 8.2 comes out officially. I seem to have fixed my
> problems with the printing by installing some RPMS (the
> "Jan" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I tried this one and I ran 'rpm -i lilypond-1.4.2-1mdk.i586.rpm' got the
>> following:
>>
>> cannot open Packages index using db3 - Permission denied (13)
Jan> Hmm, so it seems that your system is stuck half way
> "Jan" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> Ah, ok, thanks. None of the developers runs Mandrake, that I know
Jan> of...
I'm not much of a developer, but I do run Mandrake. I usually compile
my own lily, though.
--
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www
Michael J McGonagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[keeping discussion on list]
Hi Micheal,
>> Where did you get this rpm? It may be very old. I just tried the
>> latest from my neares cooker mirror
>>
>(ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS2/
Michael J McGonagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[keeping discussion on list]
> 1.4.11
Ok, good.
> I am using the default install that comes with Mandrake 8.0, which is
> 1.4 I also did a search for the libraries and it would seem there are
> several installed, but it looks like there is a 'lib
Michael J McGonagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been trying to get Lilypond installed now for the past week.
Which version?
> I have tried to compile from sources (which cause an error about
> missing some guile component, the docs say 1.3x or better, I have
> 1.4),
>From a quick peek
Hello All,
I have been trying to get Lilypond installed now for the past week. I
have tried to compile from sources (which cause an error about missing
some guile component, the docs say 1.3x or better, I have 1.4), and I
have tried to use the rpm binaries (this complained that the rpm file
was i
30 matches
Mail list logo
