At 10:04 AM 3/18/2004 -0700, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
>On Thursday March 18 2004 03:12, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>> This is actually documented in the notation maunual:
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Pitches.ht
>>ml#Pitches
>>
>> /Mats
>
>So it is; int
On Thursday March 18 2004 03:12, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> This is actually documented in the notation maunual:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Pitches.ht
>ml#Pitches
>
> /Mats
So it is; interesting how I missed those details while reading the page
before. I d
This is actually documented in the notation maunual:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Pitches.html#Pitches
/Mats
Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
On Wednesday March 17 2004 10:48, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
On the topic of ambiguities, es and ees both are e-flat; I
On the topic of ambiguities, es and ees both are e-flat; I haven't seen it
documented or used so I avoid it myself. it it normal, correct, and
acceptable for proper style?
It's probably just included for completeness. For people who don't
speak dutch, it's easier to discribe the general principle
On Wednesday March 17 2004 10:48, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> > On the topic of ambiguities, es and ees both are e-flat; I haven't seen
> > it documented or used so I avoid it myself. it it normal, correct, and
> > acceptable for proper style?
>
> It's probably just included for completeness. For peopl
