Link to the article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/11/arts/music/classical-music-editing-publishing.html?unlocked_article_code=1.304.BW6k.Fhv8VUgv47XR&smid=url-share
It should bypass the paywall as a gift article.
On 14.03.2025 15.20, Yoshiaki Onishi wrote:
Inside the Detail-Obsessed, Essent
tion Sibelius.
>
I came across this article a few days ago, and I thought it was interesting to
see such an article coming out at this very moment. While it is true that music
editors indeed exist in major music publishers, I felt that NYTimes dealt with
the topic only cursorily. Whi
Am 13.03.2025 um 17:22 schrieb Kevin Zembower:
Thought this audience might be interested in this New York Times
article entitled, "Inside the Detail-Obsessed, Essential World of Music
Editing." There's some quotes from Elaine Gould, and a link to "Behind
Bars." No mention of Lilypond, but does me
Thought this audience might be interested in this New York Times
article entitled, "Inside the Detail-Obsessed, Essential World of Music
Editing." There's some quotes from Elaine Gould, and a link to "Behind
Bars." No mention of Lilypond, but does mention Sibelius.
I suspect that this link will on
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:12:54PM -0700, zzk wrote:
> Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote
> > Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like
> > I took a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file)
> > find/replace mechanisms in sublime text are
Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote
> Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like I
> took
> a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) find/replace
> mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially since you can't use
> them macros.
nces.
>
> Zoran
Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like I took
a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) find/replace
mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially since you can't use
them macros.
I rather prefer emacs' M-x query repla
nd syntax highlighting to work in Vim. I followed
>>>>> the instructions here:
>>>>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-s
> upp
>>
>>>>>
> ort.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On N
Have you tried
http://www.hochstrasser.org/index.php/CoolSoftware/NPPLilyPond
?
MT
Namens Knute Snortum
Verzonden: zaterdag 7 november 2015 19:04
Aan: John Aten
CC: lilypond-user
Onderwerp: Re: LilyPond-aware text editors
On Windows I like Notepad++ (https://notepad-plus
upp
>
>>>>
ort.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was
>>>>> alw
27;t been able to get the
> >> Lilypond syntax highlighting to work in Vim. I followed the
> >> instructions here:
> >> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-supp
> > ort.html
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 5, 2015, at
highlighting to work in Vim. I followed the
>> instructions here:
>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-supp
> ort.html
>>
>>
>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always
>> considering the steps - plain text editor - enhanced editor -
>> IDE
>>
>> but suddenly have the impression that th
Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always
> considering the steps
> - plain text editor
> - enhanced editor
> - IDE
>
> but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't ac
types of
LilyPond editing environments.
Best
Urs
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183166p183217.html
> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
why not using an editor with a preview like http://frescobaldi.org/ ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183166p183217.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183189p183208.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
On 05.11.2015 21:58, Thomas Morley wrote:
2015-11-05 16:18 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
...
Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
but doesn't try to be an IDE?
...
I mostly use jEdit.
Me too.
IDE-wise, I feel safer with minimalist homegrown, even if primitive.
Edito
I use an app called Koder on iOS. It does syntax highlighting and some
keyword completion for LilyPond files straight out of the box. It's not
particularly useful for heavy or even medium weight lifting, but it's great
for a quick proofread when I'm away from my main machine.
Cameron Horsburgh
Sublime Text is a rather friendly and modern text editor.
http://www.sublimetext.com
I becomes Lilypond-aware if you use a language package like this one:
https://github.com/yrammos/SubLilyPond
David Elaine Alt
415 . 341 .4954 "*Confusion is
highly under
2015-11-05 16:18 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
> Hi all,
>
> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always
> considering the steps
> - plain text editor
> - enhanced editor
> - IDE
>
> but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't actual
On 11/5/2015 12:21 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 05.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Johan Vromans:
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100
Urs Liska wrote:
Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
but doesn't try to be an IDE?
Eh, Emacs?
Well, Emacs tries to be the *mother* of a
On 06/11/2015 04:21, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 05.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Johan Vromans:
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100
Urs Liska wrote:
Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
but doesn't try to be an IDE?
Eh, Emacs?
Well, Emacs tries to be the *mother* of all
TextMate is mac only ( http://macromates.com/ ) but I think I have seen other
text editors support the TextMate bundle format.
-Paul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am 05.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Johan Vromans:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100
> Urs Liska wrote:
>
>> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
>> but doesn't try to be an IDE?
> Eh, Emacs?
Well, Emacs tries to be the *mother* of all IDEs.
> -- Johan
>
> __
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100
Urs Liska wrote:
> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
> but doesn't try to be an IDE?
Eh, Emacs?
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
Hi Urs,
> Does this have LilyPond support? I can't see anything detailed on the website.
Amongst other things, syntax-colouring is totally customizable. I wrote a basic
Lilypond syntax-colour plist 11 years ago (cf.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-01/msg00668.html), but I
- Original Message -
From: "Urs Liska"
To: "lilypond-user"
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 3:18 PM
Subject: LilyPond-aware text editors
Hi all,
does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always
considering the steps
- plain text editor
- enhanc
Am 05.11.2015 um 16:27 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Urs,
>
>> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? […]
>> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least syntax
>> highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of the followi
Hi Urs,
> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? […]
> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least syntax
> highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of the following:
> - code completion
> - input helpers
> - music functions
> -
Hi all,
does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always
considering the steps
- plain text editor
- enhanced editor
- IDE
but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't actually exist.
What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least s
l.
I'm far too inexperienced with text editors to be able to say
anything subtantial about it, but it does have the benefit of being
open-source and meshing well with git-based workflows (which, as the
blog has been discussing, is an interesting direction for Lily).
Atom is my favorite e
h
the Lilypond book project, and -- so far -- it seems pretty powerful.
I'm far too inexperienced with text editors to be able to say
anything subtantial about it, but it does have the benefit of being
open-source and meshing well with git-based workflows (which, as the
blog has been disc
werful.
I'm far too inexperienced with text editors to be able to say anything
subtantial about it, but it does have the benefit of being open-source and
meshing well with git-based workflows (which, as the blog has been
discussing, is an interesting direction for Lily).
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:16
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:28:18 -0700
Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
> Among the recent threads that nearly touched off another editor war, I
> wanted to mention that I've recently switched from using emacs to sublime
> text.
I want to stay far away from editor wars —I love my editor, feel free to
Among the recent threads that nearly touched off another editor war, I
wanted to mention that I've recently switched from using emacs to sublime
text. (Although I still use emacs for complicated macros.)
I was happy to find this sublime text package for Lilypond, and wanted to
let others know abo
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 25.06.2013 19:01, schrieb Joram Berger:
I have *never* seen "reply to group" in any client I've worked with.
It is usually called "Reply All" or "Followup".
Thunderbird calls it "Reply to mailing list" and it is an alternative
choice to "Reply to s
Am 25.06.2013 19:01, schrieb Joram Berger:
I have *never* seen "reply to group" in any client I've worked with.
It is usually called "Reply All" or "Followup".
Thunderbird calls it "Reply to mailing list" and it is an alternative
choice to "Reply to sender".
My Thunderbird even gives me "Repl
On 25 Jun 2013, at 18:39 , Tim Slattery wrote:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
A little late but count +1 for me Jan.
Elm, which this guy loves, is an ancient, text-based email client.
Not relevant, the principle holds with all mailers. I use a graphical
email program
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>>> I have *never* seen "reply to group" in any client I've worked with.
>>
>> It is usually called "Reply All" or "Followup".
>
> And usually invoked by typing F or R :-)
You mean F or f (depending on whether you want to quote the original).
R
David Kastrup writes:
>> I have *never* seen "reply to group" in any client I've worked with.
>
> It is usually called "Reply All" or "Followup".
And usually invoked by typing F or R :-)
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar®
>> I have *never* seen "reply to group" in any client I've worked with.
>
> It is usually called "Reply All" or "Followup".
>
Thunderbird calls it "Reply to mailing list" and it is an alternative
choice to "Reply to sender".
___
lilypond-user mailing
Tim Slattery writes:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
>>Tim McNamara writes:
>>
>>> Aarrgh, I forgot to send this to the list. I will never get used to
>>> the goofy way in which the LilyPond mailing list operates, not having
>>> the Reply-To header set to the list. It is the only mailing list I
>
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>Tim McNamara writes:
>
>> Aarrgh, I forgot to send this to the list. I will never get used to
>> the goofy way in which the LilyPond mailing list operates, not having
>> the Reply-To header set to the list. It is the only mailing list I
>> have ever been part of that d
Tim McNamara writes:
> Aarrgh, I forgot to send this to the list. I will never get used to
> the goofy way in which the LilyPond mailing list operates, not having
> the Reply-To header set to the list. It is the only mailing list I
> have ever been part of that doesn't have this as the default.
Aarrgh, I forgot to send this to the list. I will never get used to the goofy
way in which the LilyPond mailing list operates, not having the Reply-To header
set to the list. It is the only mailing list I have ever been part of that
doesn't have this as the default.
On Jun 25, 2013, at 8:10
-
De: "Urs Liska"
À: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Envoyé: Mardi 25 Juin 2013 09:11:53
Objet: Re: Editors
Am 25.06.2013 08:29, schrieb Philippe de Rochambeau:
In the Mac version of Lilypond, is there a way to:
- prevent the application from creating a new file each time it is run So
Hi,
every time you double-click Lilypond for Mac, it create a new .ly file.
I would just like to disable that.
Philippe
- Mail original -
De: "Urs Liska"
À: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Envoyé: Mardi 25 Juin 2013 09:11:53
Objet: Re: Editors
Am 25.06.2013 08:29, schrieb P
.it/~nicola.vitacolonna/home/software>
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Editors-tp147376p147380.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@g
Am 25.06.2013 08:29, schrieb Philippe de Rochambeau:
In the Mac version of Lilypond, is there a way to:
- prevent the application from creating a new file each time it is run
Sorry, I don't really understand what you mean.
- use an editor (eg, BBEdit) other than the default one
You can use _a
In the Mac version of Lilypond, is there a way to:
- prevent the application from creating a new file each time it is run
- use an editor (eg, BBEdit) other than the default one
Many thanks
pr
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
h
Zenaan Harkness writes:
> On 10/5/12, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
>>>
>>> Not yet, thanks for that!
>>>
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
>>>
>>> Actually, I've already asked for ma
On 10/5/12, David Kastrup wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
>>> Have you read
>>>
>>>http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
>>
>> Not yet, thanks for that!
>>
>>> on Bradley Kuhn's
>>>
>>>http://sfconservancy.org/
>>
>> Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member
>> som
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> Have you read
>>
>>http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
>
> Not yet, thanks for that!
>
>> on Bradley Kuhn's
>>
>>http://sfconservancy.org/
>
> Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member
> some months ago, and it seems to be a quite slow p
> Have you read
>
>http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
Not yet, thanks for that!
> on Bradley Kuhn's
>
>http://sfconservancy.org/
Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member
some months ago, and it seems to be a quite slow process...
Maybe we should do the same
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> I'm getting "crowd-funded" for my work on LilyPond,
>
> Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> I'm getting "crowd-funded" for my work on LilyPond,
>
> Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance
David Kastrup writes:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
>>> I'm getting "crowd-funded" for my work on LilyPond,
>>
>> Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
>
> https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/126>
>
> I am not convinced a crowd-funding service that has still to find a
> solution fo
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> I'm getting "crowd-funded" for my work on LilyPond,
>
> Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/126>
I am not convinced a crowd-funding service that has still to find a
solution for making actual payouts is the way to
> I'm getting "crowd-funded" for my work on LilyPond,
Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
James writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 5 October 2012 02:08, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> Any estimates of the number of "active" users of lilypond? We could
>> arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it
>> eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but kickstarter
>> results in I
Hello,
On 5 October 2012 02:08, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Any estimates of the number of "active" users of lilypond? We could
> arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it
> eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but kickstarter
> results in I think in 10% or so lost
Any estimates of the number of "active" users of lilypond? We could
arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it
eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but kickstarter
results in I think in 10% or so lost to the middle men, but it could
suffice. I'd be happy to pay stra
I thought of a solution.
This is not a quick task eventough I know what needs to be done, since such an
editor, only more advanced, is Laborejo.
For simple purposes it will be easy to do but quickly you encounter
shortcomings and the display is unstatisfying again which is the point where
the
Francisco Vila wrote:
> I think that what you want does actually exist, and it is called a
> spreadsheet. They are commonly used for (or primarily intended for)
> numbers and formulae laid out in rows and columns, although people do
> use them for pretty everything from "I lost my dog" ads to rest
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Nils Gey wrote:
> I thought of a solution.
> [...]
> Summary: It is totally possible, but I can't do it right now.
So, 50 bucks will have to wait :)
I'm actually surprised that noone pledged any additional bounty...
Janek
_
ery
>> uncomfortable, and i'm sure many people feel the same.
>> That's why i'd like to have my code formatted in a way that is
>> visually similar to the actual score. As i've explained earlier, i
>> think it's not feasible to do such formatting by
I think MTX was doing that (or PMX?). I used it and would counsel to
try it there. If you find it usefull, why not?
Personally, I am happy with writing down on paper and transcribing
then (when the music becomes to complicated form my poor coding
habits).
Francois
2012/10/3, David Kastrup :
> Urs
This is not a quick task eventough I know what needs to be done, since such an
editor, only more advanced, is Laborejo.
For simple purposes it will be easy to do but quickly you encounter
shortcomings and the display is unstatisfying again which is the point where
the code need extensions and r
same.
> That's why i'd like to have my code formatted in a way that is
> visually similar to the actual score. As i've explained earlier, i
> think it's not feasible to do such formatting by hand - that's why i
> believe it's something that Lily
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 03.10.2012 10:12, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> Disabling automatic l
Am 03.10.2012 10:12, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Janek Warchoł writes:
Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling
is the key :)
Of
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> Hi,
>>
>> sorry for delay...
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Janek Warchoł writes:
Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling
is the key :)
Of course, it would
7;d like to have my code formatted in a way that is
visually similar to the actual score. As i've explained earlier, i
think it's not feasible to do such formatting by hand - that's why i
believe it's something that Lily editors could do. And they could
allow to s
respect, but for me it's very
uncomfortable, and i'm sure many people feel the same.
That's why i'd like to have my code formatted in a way that is
visually similar to the actual score. As i've explained earlier, i
think it's not feasible to do such formatting by han
On 27/09/12 01:41, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/9/26 Urs Liska :
>> Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
>>> the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
>>> the same musical time.
>>>
>> Oh y
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/9/26 Urs Liska :
>> Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
>>> the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
>>> the same musical time.
>>>
>> Oh yeah, that's some
2012/9/26 Urs Liska :
> Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
>> the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
>> the same musical time.
>>
> Oh yeah, that's something I'd second.
> In an ideal w
2012/9/26 Christ van Willegen :
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
>> TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the
>> same file, updates in one window are immediately live in the other.
>
> Vim can do that with as many windows as you'd like...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
> TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the
> same file, updates in one window are immediately live in the other.
Vim can do that with as many windows as you'd like...
Christ van Willegen
--
09 F9 11 02 9D 7
On 26 Sep 2012, at 14:06 , Urs Liska wrote:
Oh yeah, that's something I'd second.
In an ideal world these windows wouldn't only go into the same file
but into the same piece of music.
TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and
the same file, updates in one window
Urs Liska writes:
> But I think this would be quite complex, because the editor would have
> to know the musical moment we are at. Which seems complicated from the
> beginning, but if we start to (re-)use variables ...
Seems like point-and-click Midi would deliver most of the required
informatio
Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
Janek Warchoł writes:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
wrote:
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
"regular lilypond" to "ho
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>>>
>>> What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
>>> "regular lilypon
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
wrote:
>
> On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>>
>> What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
>> "regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back?
Am 26.09.2012 13:53, schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
"regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
above would be displayed as (view
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
"regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
above would be displayed as (view using monospace font):
<<
{ a4 b c
the current time signature.
We could require the user to use bar checks - not an optimal solution,
but i could live with that.
> I try to do it as as a standalone Python function so Fresobaldi and other
> editors can use it. No promises..
That would be cool! As i've said, if it w
Nils Gey writes:
> I have to see if Frescobaldi has an internal representation of
> durations and time signatures/bar length, but I guess not.
Really? I know Emacs has it since it complains when you place bar
checks at the "wrong" point of time. Frescobaldi, judging from its
description, appea
gt; - it requires effort to maintain the alignment,
> - it is not feasible to write longer fragments this way (e.g. whole piece)
> - when there is a lot of overrides, articulations etc, it becomes
> not-so-effective in my opinion.
>
> What about editors like Frescobaldi having the abi
culations etc, it becomes
not-so-effective in my opinion.
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
"regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
above would be displayed as (view using monospace font):
<<
{ a4 b c d e f
Op Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:20:43 -0400
Brett McCoy schreef:
> I was
> thinking recently what would really make Frescobaldi rock even more is
> customizable keybindings, I would love to have emacs keybindings.
You can customize the keybindings in Frescobaldi 1.x:
Settings->Configure Shortcuts. Under
> "James" == James Harkins writes:
James> At Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:33:48 +1000, Peter Chubb wrote:
>> I just do C-c C-c and then View --- xpdf then runs in the
>> background. C-c C-c again reruns lilypond, hit R in the Xpdf
>> window and it refreshes. Done!
James> Hm... no, that's not happen
At Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:33:48 +1000,
Peter Chubb wrote:
> I just do C-c C-c and then View --- xpdf then runs in the background.
> C-c C-c again reruns lilypond, hit R in the Xpdf window and it
> refreshes. Done!
Thanks for the tips, will play with it some more.
I'm actually leaning back toward Em
> "James" == James Harkins writes:
James> At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:51:54 -0400, Christopher R. Maden wrote:
>> What OS are you using?
>>
>> I use Evince under Ubuntu/GNOME to view PDF files, and it
>> automatically notes when the file has changed. When I recompile in
>> Emacs, Evince refreshe
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, James Harkins wrote:
> At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:20:43 -0400,
> Brett McCoy wrote:
>> I've used both the emacs lilypond mode and Frescobaldi. I like the
>> emacs mode because, well, it's emacs, but in the end, though, I think
>> I prefer using Frescobaldi just because
At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:20:43 -0400,
Brett McCoy wrote:
> I've used both the emacs lilypond mode and Frescobaldi. I like the
> emacs mode because, well, it's emacs, but in the end, though, I think
> I prefer using Frescobaldi just because it has more music-related
> features than emacs...
Oh, right
At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:51:54 -0400,
Christopher R. Maden wrote:
> What OS are you using?
>
> I use Evince under Ubuntu/GNOME to view PDF files, and it automatically
> notes when the file has changed. When I recompile in Emacs, Evince
> refreshes the view momentarily afterward. Evince or one of t
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:28 AM, James Harkins wrote:
> I'm in search of the "best of both worlds" ly editor.
>
> I've gotten started with Frescobaldi. Autocompletion is invaluable, and the
> integrated PDF view and help browser is a real lifesaver.
>
> But, I use Emacs for just about everything
On 06/20/2011 05:28 AM, James Harkins wrote:
> - PDF display is treated as a compilation process. To view a new
> rendering, I'm forced to close the old viewer window first (!). (Also
> a bit of sloppiness in the Emacs variable handling -- since I don't
> have xpdf on my system, I changed the appro
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
