Re: detailed look on lilypond output

2004-05-04 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Friday 16 April 2004 23.48, Michael Kiermaier wrote: > Hello! Sorry for the very late reply. > It is my strong believe that a perfect music typesetter only needs the pure > musical information of a music file, without redundancy. For this reason I > never was happy with Finale & Co., and for t

Re: detailed look on lilypond output

2004-04-24 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Saturday 24 April 2004 13.38, Michael Kiermaier wrote: > bump > > Is there anything wrong with my posting? It was an excellent posting, thanks! > Should I post it to the bugs mailing list? Sorry, I haven't looked through it carefully yet, but it is in my queue. I suspect that some of the bug

Re: detailed look on lilypond output

2004-04-24 Thread Michael Kiermaier
bump Is there anything wrong with my posting? Should I post it to the bugs mailing list? ~michael On Friday 16 April 2004 23:48, Michael Kiermaier wrote: > Hello! > > It is my strong believe that a perfect music typesetter only needs the pure > musical information of a music file, without redund

detailed look on lilypond output

2004-04-16 Thread Michael Kiermaier
Hello! It is my strong believe that a perfect music typesetter only needs the pure musical information of a music file, without redundancy. For this reason I never was happy with Finale & Co., and for the very same reason lilypond looks tremendously appealing to me. I finished my first lilypon